Re: [PLEASE VOTE] so what should we be working on

On 28 May 2016 22:37:26 BST, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >I have been focused on other things for a while (and the why and the >what will become public fairly soon) and decided to use that chance to >figure out what would happen if I just stopped paying attention here >for a while. >

Re: [PLEASE VOTE] so what should we be working on

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > a) no one cares about Subsurface-mobile. No bug reports, no code, no > suggestions, nothing. So I guess we should call this a failed attempt and > abandon it - screw the 500 or so people who use it. > Are you insane?

Re: [PLEASE VOTE] so what should we be working on

On 28 May 2016 23:37, "Dirk Hohndel" wrote: > > So what should we be working on...? Should we... > > (1) just shut this down and move on? > (2) move things to maintenance mode, abandon Subsurface-mobile, fix bugs in Subsurface whenever we find time but otherwise declare victory?

[PLEASE VOTE] so what should we be working on

I have been focused on other things for a while (and the why and the what will become public fairly soon) and decided to use that chance to figure out what would happen if I just stopped paying attention here for a while. Here's what I think I learned (correct me if I'm wrong) a) no one cares

[PATCH] Shearwater import model name for Petrel and Predator

Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia --- core/parse-xml.c | 12 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/core/parse-xml.c b/core/parse-xml.c index e22881b..87e2e6a 100644 --- a/core/parse-xml.c +++ b/core/parse-xml.c @@ -2723,6 +2723,12 @@ extern int