Re: Scubapro Aladin Square

On 12-11-17 19:09, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:16 AM, vavincavent wrote: I try with joined file scubapro_g2.c to download from scubapro square. Hmm. Can I see what the packets on the wire are, just in case we have some odd libusb issue or

Re: OK, this is pretty cool

Enthusiastic ACK. Please send pull request that shows how this would work. On November 12, 2017 1:47:13 PM PST, "Lubomir I. Ivanov" wrote: >On 12 November 2017 at 09:22, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> >> On Nov 11, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Stefan Fuchs

Re: OK, this is pretty cool

On 12 November 2017 at 09:22, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Stefan Fuchs wrote: > > I would keep posting the subsurface.exe > When creating my own builds and testing I very often just replace the exe to > test s.th. because it's faster...

Re: RFC: Subsurface 1-dive print layout

On 12 November 2017 at 19:47, Willem Ferguson wrote: > Attached is a print layout file and PDF rendering of a dive in the > 1-dive-per-page version. The existing 1-dive layout has irked me quite a bit > and for some time. Therefore I have messed a bit with the

Re: Scubapro Aladin Square

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:16 AM, vavincavent wrote: > > I try with joined file scubapro_g2.c to download from scubapro square. Hmm. Can I see what the packets on the wire are, just in case we have some odd libusb issue or something? We added an initial zero byte for the

Re: latest AppImage - getting closer

On 12-11-17 17:01, Dirk Hohndel wrote: On Nov 12, 2017, at 4:56 AM, Jan Mulder wrote: On 12-11-17 13:35, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: On 12 November 2017 at 07:26, Willem Ferguson wrote: Below is the output. Its greek to me, I just

Re: latest AppImage - getting closer

> On Nov 12, 2017, at 6:40 AM, Willem Ferguson > wrote: > > On 12/11/2017 14:35, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: >> On 12 November 2017 at 07:26, Willem Ferguson >> wrote: >>> Below is the output. Its greek to me, I just followed the

Re: latest AppImage - getting closer

> On Nov 12, 2017, at 4:56 AM, Jan Mulder wrote: > > On 12-11-17 13:35, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: >> On 12 November 2017 at 07:26, Willem Ferguson >> wrote: >>> >>> Below is the output. Its greek to me, I just followed the recipe >>>

Re: OK, this is pretty cool

> On Nov 12, 2017, at 12:52 AM, Anton Lundin wrote: > > Yea, its a old and obsolete variant. Just trying to give you some > examples on how it was done once back in time. Much appreciated > Btw. What still requires QtWebKit? Printing? As was discussed a few times: -

Re: latest AppImage - getting closer

On 12-11-17 13:35, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: On 12 November 2017 at 07:26, Willem Ferguson wrote: Below is the output. Its greek to me, I just followed the recipe mechanically. i can't find any outstanding errors in the log; all libraries are present, no bad

Re: latest AppImage - getting closer

On 12 November 2017 at 07:26, Willem Ferguson wrote: > > Below is the output. Its greek to me, I just followed the recipe > mechanically. i can't find any outstanding errors in the log; all libraries are present, no bad calls to CUPS. so in a way, i have no idea

Re: OK, this is pretty cool

On 12 November, 2017 - Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > On Nov 11, 2017, at 11:49 PM, Anton Lundin wrote: > > > > I had a old .travis.yml building Subsurface on os x: > > https://github.com/glance-/subsurface/blob/obsolete/master_travis_osx/.travis.yml > > I took a quick look. So

Re: OK, this is pretty cool

> On Nov 11, 2017, at 11:49 PM, Anton Lundin wrote: > > I had a old .travis.yml building Subsurface on os x: > https://github.com/glance-/subsurface/blob/obsolete/master_travis_osx/.travis.yml I took a quick look. So easy. If only it was that easy for me. But then it's