Re: Subsurface as a Snap?

2017-12-21 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On December 21, 2017 6:19:45 PM PST, Philip Balister wrote: > >Don't forget the dinosaurs (like me) that build from source :) Those cause me the least work. /D ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org

Re: Subsurface as a Snap?

2017-12-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 21 de dezembro de 2017 13:15:53 -02 Dirk Hohndel wrote: > Snap is a Canonical effort and as such is receiving at best "lip-service" > level support from the other distros. FlatPak was very much developed by > Red Hat as a response to Snap and as a direct competitor. As a result >

Re: Subsurface as a Snap?

2017-12-21 Thread Lubomir I. Ivanov
On 21 December 2017 at 17:15, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > On Dec 21, 2017, at 6:54 AM, Henrik B A wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> >> Snap and Flatpak both are different takes on what we already have with >>

Re: Subsurface as a Snap?

2017-12-21 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Dec 21, 2017, at 6:54 AM, Henrik B A wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Dirk Hohndel > wrote: > Snap and Flatpak both are different takes on what we already have with > AppImage. > The goal of AppImage was to have

Re: Subsurface as a Snap?

2017-12-21 Thread Henrik B A
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > Snap and Flatpak both are different takes on what we already have with > AppImage. > The goal of AppImage was to have fewer builds to worry about. And it > brilliantly does that. > So unless there is something that is a)

Re: Subsurface as a Snap?

2017-12-21 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Dec 21, 2017, at 1:30 AM, Henrik B A wrote: > > Has anyone looked into how feasible it would be to build Subsurface as a > Snap? It would be an alternative to the AppImage. > > Ref. https://docs.snapcraft.io/build-snaps/c >

Re: Q_PROPERTYs in preferences code

2017-12-21 Thread Sebastian Kügler
Hi Berthold, On Saturday, December 16, 2017 1:26:16 PM CET Berthold Stoeger wrote: > Short question: Are the numerous Q_PROPERTY macros in core/subsurface-qt/ > SettingsObjectWrapper.h needed for the mobile version? If I remove them, the > desktop version compiles and works just fine. > >

Subsurface as a Snap?

2017-12-21 Thread Henrik B A
Has anyone looked into how feasible it would be to build Subsurface as a Snap? It would be an alternative to the AppImage. Ref. https://docs.snapcraft.io/build-snaps/c Cheers, Henrik ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org

Re: Unable to compile on master

2017-12-21 Thread Ivan Wagner
I recloned the sources it's ok. Thank you. On 20.12.2017 08:52, Miika Turkia wrote: try running following in subsurface source directory: git submodule init git submodule update --recursive On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Ivan Wagner