Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 04:24:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > >> > >> Ok, so it's using the BLE code, it just isn't able to get a service list. > >> Odd. > > > > Indeed - what's the next step to debug this? My guess is

Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> >> Ok, so it's using the BLE code, it just isn't able to get a service list. >> Odd. > > Indeed - what's the next step to debug this? My guess is that we should > somehow dump what we get back? We do. Normally you'd see

Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 04:17:18PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > With a bunch more debugging code added (and a rewritten function to report > > the supported transports), here are the logs from the attempts with BLE > > and with BT to connect to my Petrel 2 / dual stack: > > > > "10.440:

Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> >> And after rebooting everything I finally got it connected. >> Subsurface sees it both as LE and classic device. I tried downloading >> via both protocols and in both cases got "Dive computer transport >> not supported".

Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 01:50:46PM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > On Apr 25, 2018, at 1:34 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > >> or similar. But it _would_ be good to test that this actually makes > >> Petrel 2 work with rfcomm. Because it's certainly possible that there > >> is

Re: Any brave dive computer download testers out there?

On 25 April, 2018 - Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Anton Lundin wrote: > > > > I've tested it now, via the serial layer, libftdi layer, classic bt > > layer, and with your latest patch BLE and they all work. > > Ok, so for you the classic BT case

Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

> On Apr 25, 2018, at 1:34 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> or similar. But it _would_ be good to test that this actually makes >> Petrel 2 work with rfcomm. Because it's certainly possible that there >> is something else wrong with rfcomm. > > Right now I'm testing. > > (1)

Re: Text edit in 4.7.8.69

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:40:21PM +, Chirana Gheorghita Eugeniu Theodor wrote: > Hello guys, > Just did a short try dive with a poseidon seven and arrived home, dowloaded > the dive from Petrel 1 using android app 4.7.8.69 and surprise. When I > enter the text in notes section it always

Text edit in 4.7.8.69

Hello guys, Just did a short try dive with a poseidon seven and arrived home, dowloaded the dive from Petrel 1 using android app 4.7.8.69 and surprise. When I enter the text in notes section it always capitalizes . I force small letters and the next letter I type after a small one is again

Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 01:04:36PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > > > Odd. It was _supposed_ to apply to current master. > > Ok, apparently you worked it out. Yes > Anyway, the commit message could be

Re: Any brave dive computer download testers out there?

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > I have a Petrel (single stack BT) and Petrel 2 (dual stack) and will test > those over lunch today. I'll try to test Mac and Android (embarrassingly, > I currently don't have a Linux laptop with working BLE...) Note that

Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Odd. It was _supposed_ to apply to current master. Ok, apparently you worked it out. Anyway, the commit message could be something simple along the lines of Do a better job of picking which transport

Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > Which tree should this apply against? Maybe I'm just extra dumb today, but > it applies neither to current master nor to your tree from yesterday. > What am I missing (besides a brain, I mean)? Odd. It was _supposed_ to

Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:57:13AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:47:27AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > So attached is a trial patch. It makes sense to me, but I don't have > > any rfcomm devices to try with. > > Which tree should this apply against? Maybe I'm

Re: Any brave dive computer download testers out there?

On 25/04/2018 20:51, Dirk Hohndel wrote: On Apr 25, 2018, at 11:44 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Anton Lundin wrote: I've tested it now, via the serial layer, libftdi layer, classic bt layer, and with your

Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:47:27AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So attached is a trial patch. It makes sense to me, but I don't have > any rfcomm devices to try with. Which tree should this apply against? Maybe I'm just extra dumb today, but it applies neither to current master nor to your

Re: Any brave dive computer download testers out there?

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Anton Lundin wrote: > > I've tested it now, via the serial layer, libftdi layer, classic bt > layer, and with your latest patch BLE and they all work. Ok, so for you the classic BT case now works too with that patch that I sent out a couple of

Re: Any brave dive computer download testers out there?

On 18 April, 2018 - Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Robert Helling wrote: > > > > Couldn’t get the dive computer configuration to work either with BLE or > > classic. > > Did this work with the previous release (4.7.8 or whatever)? > > I had been

Re: Cleaned up and rebased "libdivecomputer-NG" branch

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > We should now focus on figuring out the problems with the Shearwater > downloads. > For some people these fail on rfcomm, for some they fail on BLE but succeed on > rfcomm, and it seems that some can't download from their

Re: Any brave dive computer download testers out there?

Ok ... than i can confirm that for perdix does not work either. One of my friends tested the official release On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 11:43 Long, Martin wrote: > > On 25 April 2018 at 09:07, Chirana Gheorghita Eugeniu Theodor < > off...@adaptcom.ro> wrote: > >> Hmm very

Re: Travis now build-checks iOS

Dirk, > On 25. Apr 2018, at 02:02, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > (because for insane reasons you have to have a signing key available in order > to build for device) you probably know that Travis suggests using private environment variables to hold encryption keys for such

Re: Any brave dive computer download testers out there?

Hmm very weird. I use now latest 4.7.8 and successfully connects to Petrel 1 but will not connect to mh older tusa zen iq-900 over usb ftdi. On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 10:26 Long, Martin wrote: > The BLE thing has basically made subsurface unusable for me for the last > month