Thanks for catching that. Should be fixed now. Please check.
/D
> On Jun 29, 2018, at 6:49 PM, Matt Thompson wrote:
>
> I just tried to download the latest on Windows but the web site still points
> to Subsurface 4.7.8. When I install and run that version there is an alert
> that there is a
I just tried to download the latest on Windows but the web site still
points to Subsurface 4.7.8. When I install and run that version there is an
alert that there is a new version available but it points me at
http://subsurface-divelog.org/downloads/smtk2ssrf-4.8.0.exe.
macOS updated just fine.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 09:57:10PM +0200, Jan Iversen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a reason why we use tags instead of branches for a release. I am
> used to having a release branch for 2 reasons:
> - work on master is not blocked but continues normally (with cherry pick to
> the release branch)
>
On 29 June 2018 at 22:57, Jan Iversen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a reason why we use tags instead of branches for a release. I am
> used to having a release branch for 2 reasons:
> - work on master is not blocked but continues normally (with cherry pick to
> the release branch)
> - it is easy to
Hi
Is there a reason why we use tags instead of branches for a release. I am used
to having a release branch for 2 reasons:
- work on master is not blocked but continues normally (with cherry pick to the
release branch)
- it is easy to make a release patch if needed.
so hence my question.
rgds
Gratulations to all who helped make this happen!
I am proud of being part of a team that taken action serious and talk less :-)
Looking forward to prepare some greater changes to the mobile version for an
upcoming release.
Thanks
jan I
Enviado desde mi iPad
> El 29 jun 2018, a las 21:26,
Hello everyone.
As promised, I pushed out the two releases this morning. The Android app just
this moment got approved, the iOS is as usual still held up in review but
should be available "soonishly".
Everything else is available for download, tags are pushed, sources uploaded,
the
Good evening.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 06:56:03PM +0200, tormento wrote:
> There are no 0 segments, unfortunately. And by a defined time would be much
> more useful.
>
> Il giorno ven 29 giu 2018 alle 14:04 Jan Mulder ha
> scritto:
>
> > Not really what you ask for, but there is a split dive
Not really what you ask for, but there is a split dive option in the
context menu (right-click on a dive in the dive list). This splits dives
that have segments of 0m depth in the profile.
On 29-06-18 13:57, tormento wrote:
I have a request to do: I need to split a dive in two separate ones by
I have a request to do: I need to split a dive in two separate ones by
giving time after which to split. Reason is: I kept too much high
repetitive timespan on diving computer and we stayed floating before doing
the second dive. Diving computer recorded it as a single one.
Is it difficult to
10 matches
Mail list logo
