Re: RFC: Statistics in Subsurface

2020-05-11 Thread Berthold Stoeger via subsurface
On Dienstag, 12. Mai 2020 00:02:06 CEST Dirk Hohndel wrote: > Here's a crazy idea how this could look for example: > > The filters are built incrementally, with a drop down menu that allows you > to add criteria or constraints. Like date range, tags, people, etc > > once the user picks one,

Re: RFC: Statistics in Subsurface

2020-05-11 Thread Berthold Stoeger via subsurface
On Montag, 11. Mai 2020 23:02:32 CEST Dirk Hohndel wrote: > >> BUT: would this mean that the existing filter panel be rewritten in QML > >> to be mobile-compatible? > > > > This is not necessary. The filter code is generic and we only need a tiny > > display layer on top. Let's not introduce QML

Re: RFC: Statistics in Subsurface

2020-05-11 Thread Dirk Hohndel via subsurface
> On May 11, 2020, at 1:49 PM, Berthold Stoeger > wrote: > > On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2020 12:48:24 CEST Willem Ferguson via subsurface wrote: > >> 1) Adapt the existing filter mechanism to store filter 'sets' and then >> apply them to the dive list. Mechanisms to store filter "sets" and >>

Re: Fwd: RFC: Statistics in Subsurface

2020-05-11 Thread Berthold Stoeger via subsurface
On Sonntag, 10. Mai 2020 12:48:24 CEST Willem Ferguson via subsurface wrote: > 1) Adapt the existing filter mechanism to store filter 'sets' and then > apply them to the dive list. Mechanisms to store filter "sets" and > combine them to extract dive list information that is stored in the >

Re: Windows / OS X, differences in dive planning results

2020-05-11 Thread Attilla de Groot via subsurface
> On 11 May 2020, at 17:36, Robert Helling wrote: > > Dirk, > >> On 11. May 2020, at 17:32, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> >> From a visual impression of course the obvious thing is that the Windows >> user has "calculated ceiling in 3m increments" set, while the Mac users >> doesn't, but since

Re: Current rating in log (OS X)

2020-05-11 Thread Dirk Hohndel via subsurface
> On May 11, 2020, at 7:28 AM, Attilla de Groot via subsurface > wrote: > > Hi, > > Yesterday I updated to the latest Subsurface version on OS X and I notcied > that the Information tab was updated. This has a small display bug as in the > attached screenshot. > > I think that with

Re: Windows / OS X, differences in dive planning results

2020-05-11 Thread Robert Helling via subsurface
Dirk, > On 11. May 2020, at 17:32, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > From a visual impression of course the obvious thing is that the Windows user > has "calculated ceiling in 3m increments" set, while the Mac users doesn't, > but since for the Mac picture I can't even read the GF, there's not much

Re: Windows / OS X, differences in dive planning results

2020-05-11 Thread Robert Helling via subsurface
Attilla, > On 11. May 2020, at 16:20, Attilla de Groot via subsurface > wrote: > > Together with a buddy I was planning a (short) deco dive. He is using > Subsurface on Windows and I am on my Mac. We were working on a remote session > and found that the results of deco time, stops etc. were

Current rating in log (OS X)

2020-05-11 Thread Attilla de Groot via subsurface
Hi, Yesterday I updated to the latest Subsurface version on OS X and I notcied that the Information tab was updated. This has a small display bug as in the attached screenshot. I think that with “Current” Strong/Weak should be reversed or perhaps not indicated in stars. :-) — Attilla

Re: quick update on test binaries

2020-05-11 Thread Robert Helling via subsurface
> On 9. May 2020, at 00:29, Chirana Gheorghita Eugeniu Theodor via subsurface > wrote: > > Stupid something on gmail side. Not necessarily. Probably some instance (either gmail oder you local mail client) tries to prevent their users from shooting themselves in the foot (for example by

Re: quick update on test binaries

2020-05-11 Thread Chirana Gheorghita Eugeniu Theodor via subsurface
Got the IOS update. All seems ok on IOS. I have to look at some translation strings since I spotted a mistake for Romanian On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 1:16 AM Dirk Hohndel wrote: > Theodor, > > The link for the beta program is > https://testflight.apple.com/join/k2OGhIS5 > > But as I indicated in