On 19 February 2016 17:13:02 GMT+00:00, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>> only a few more to prove dirk wrong ;)
>
>I'm looking forward to being proven wrong and seeing that there are 9
>people instead of the estimated 6. That, however, won't change my
>opinion
>on this issue.
>
>Subsurface is open source -
On 19/02/16 17:13, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> Subsurface is open source - you all are capable of building your own APK
> with whatever features you desire. If you decide to make such APKs
> publicly available (be it as download or through the play store) I
> politely request that they are NOT called Su
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:47:23AM +0100, Martin Gysel wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm currently out of a working laptop so I won't be implementing this
> >>> anytime soon, but just floating the idea here. Anyone against?
> >> This falls into the "I understand why you want this, but I don't want this
> >> i
Am 18.02.2016 um 18:41 schrieb Tim Wootton:
> On 18/02/16 15:18, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:13:56PM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I was thinking about adding a "advanced settings" to the cloud storage
>>> credentials screen, were one could point the app to a loca
> Hands up, who are the other five?
Count me in.
Poltsi
--
Paul-Erik Törrönen pol...@777-team.org
+358 40 703 1231 http://poltsi.fi/
Science, it reduces the stupid
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists
On 18/02/16 15:18, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:13:56PM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I was thinking about adding a "advanced settings" to the cloud storage
>> credentials screen, were one could point the app to a local xml file, or
>> a local git repo. That way one ca
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:13:56PM +0100, Anton Lundin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was thinking about adding a "advanced settings" to the cloud storage
> credentials screen, were one could point the app to a local xml file, or
> a local git repo. That way one can test the app without the need to push
> dat
