[2018-05-24 23:04:28 +0200] Berthold Stoeger:
> On Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2018 22:46:30 CEST Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> > [2018-05-23 07:20:43 -1000] Gaetan Bisson:
> > > Oh, it's also there:
> > > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-67948
> >
> > It turns out removing oldModel->deleteLater(); from
On Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2018 22:46:30 CEST Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2018-05-23 07:20:43 -1000] Gaetan Bisson:
> > Oh, it's also there:
> > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-67948
>
> It turns out removing oldModel->deleteLater(); from DiveListView::reload()
> avoids the segfault. See the
[2018-05-23 07:20:43 -1000] Gaetan Bisson:
> Oh, it's also there:
>
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-67948
It turns out removing oldModel->deleteLater(); from DiveListView::reload()
avoids the segfault. See the discussion in the above bug report. However I
have no idea what the
[2018-05-23 07:12:45 -1000] Gaetan Bisson:
> [2018-05-23 10:28:52 -0300] Thiago Macieira:
> > On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 05:08:58 -03 Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> > > Any ideas how to debug this?
> >
> > Can you valgrind? Without debug symbols in Qt it may be a little difficult
> > to
> > make sense
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 05:08:58 -03 Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> Any ideas how to debug this?
Can you valgrind? Without debug symbols in Qt it may be a little difficult to
make sense of what we're seeing, but it might help.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Dear all,
I'm getting a segfault when running Subsurface with Qt-5.11. It occurs
with both an old binary compiled against Qt-5.10 and a freshly rebuilt
binary. Note that building against Qt-5.11 requires fixing a couple of
headers, but that's unrelated:
