Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-26 Thread Jan Mulder
On 24-10-17 19:46, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 10:32:10 PDT Jan Mulder wrote: I can help poke people, though. Can you report the current findings so I'll poke people? created QTBUG-64017 Thanks Jan Let's see what the maintainers say. Did I mention I find the disk

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 10:32:10 PDT Jan Mulder wrote: > > I can help poke people, though. Can you report the current findings so > > I'll > > poke people? > > created QTBUG-64017 Thanks Jan Let's see what the maintainers say. Did I mention I find the disk cache a hacky feature? --

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-24 Thread Jan Mulder
On 24-10-17 18:29, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 08:30:14 PDT Tomaz Canabrava wrote: I found one commit that is in Qt 5.9.2 (and not in 5.9.1) called "Fix qml cache invalidation when changing dependent C++ registered QML singletons" (commit

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 24 October 2017 08:30:14 PDT Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > I found one commit that is in Qt 5.9.2 (and not in 5.9.1) called "Fix qml > > cache invalidation when changing dependent C++ registered QML singletons" > > (commit 98358715930739ca8de172d88c5ce6941c275ff3 in qtdeclarative). > >

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-24 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Jan Mulder wrote: > On 23-10-17 18:23, Jan Mulder wrote: > >> On 23-10-17 17:44, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> >>> >>> On Oct 23, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Tomaz Canabrava > wrote: On

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-24 Thread Jan Mulder
On 23-10-17 18:23, Jan Mulder wrote: On 23-10-17 17:44, Dirk Hohndel wrote: On Oct 23, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Tomaz Canabrava > wrote: On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Jan Mulder > wrote:  

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-23 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Oct 23, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Jan Mulder > wrote: > Unfortunately, very very limited progress. I found out that 2nd code fragment > above does not tell the

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-23 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Jan Mulder wrote: > Unfortunately, very very limited progress. I found out that 2nd code >>> fragment above does not tell the whole story. Obviously, it needs an >>> "import QtQuick.Controls 2.2" the get the ApplicationWindow defined. >>>

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-23 Thread Jan Mulder
Unfortunately, very very limited progress. I found out that 2nd code fragment above does not tell the whole story. Obviously, it needs an "import QtQuick.Controls 2.2" the get the ApplicationWindow defined. However, adding "import org.kde.kirigami 2.0 as Kirigami" triggers the exit on the

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-14 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Oct 14, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Jan Mulder wrote: > > On 14-10-17 12:59, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:04:03PM +0200, Jan Mulder wrote: >>> >>> That was a useful tip, thanks Lubomir. Not out of the woods yet but an >>> interesting observation: >>> >>>

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-14 Thread Jan Mulder
On 14-10-17 12:59, Dirk Hohndel wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:04:03PM +0200, Jan Mulder wrote: That was a useful tip, thanks Lubomir. Not out of the woods yet but an interesting observation: Kirigami.ApplicationWindow { id: rootItem title: "Subsurface-mobile" } gives same

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-14 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:04:03PM +0200, Jan Mulder wrote: > > That was a useful tip, thanks Lubomir. Not out of the woods yet but an > interesting observation: > > Kirigami.ApplicationWindow { > id: rootItem > title: "Subsurface-mobile" > } > > gives same problem, but > >

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-12 Thread Dirk Hohndel
Marco, See below, any idea? We are currently pinning Kirigami to a specific SHA from last week. /D > On Oct 12, 2017, at 11:04, Jan Mulder wrote: > >> On 12-10-17 19:34, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: >>> On 12 October 2017 at 20:28, Jan Mulder wrote: >>>

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-12 Thread Jan Mulder
On 12-10-17 19:34, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote: On 12 October 2017 at 20:28, Jan Mulder wrote: Just upgraded my (Arch Linux) system to Qt 5.9.2. But now mobile-on-desktop does not run any more (same for an android build). It exits very early in run_ui() with the message "can't

Re: no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-12 Thread Lubomir I. Ivanov
On 12 October 2017 at 20:28, Jan Mulder wrote: > Just upgraded my (Arch Linux) system to Qt 5.9.2. But now mobile-on-desktop > does not run any more (same for an android build). > > It exits very early in run_ui() with the message "can't create window > object", and I am

no luck with Qt 5.9.2

2017-10-12 Thread Jan Mulder
Just upgraded my (Arch Linux) system to Qt 5.9.2. But now mobile-on-desktop does not run any more (same for an android build). It exits very early in run_ui() with the message "can't create window object", and I am totally unsure where to start looking for the issue. Anybody a good idea