Re: pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-15 Thread Miika Turkia
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Jan Mulder wrote: > On 15-01-16 05:59, Miika Turkia wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Jan Mulder wrote: >>> >>> Rick, >>> >>> On 14-01-16 21:56, Rick Walsh wrote: >>> >>> Jan, >>> >>> On 14 Jan 2016 19:52,

Re: pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-15 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:22:30PM +0200, Miika Turkia wrote: > > Well, it seems that the libs on the debug apk are stripped, so I fail > to get more exact information out of this (first time trying to dig > into tombstone, so that might affect the results as well). Anyway, > hopefully the

Re: pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-15 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 02:43:42PM -0200, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > This seems... Unlikely? > If the model row is < than the pinfo.nr, things should always point to a > safe memory zone. Well, three different people have now created more or less identical stack traces from crashes. Unlikely or

Re: pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-15 Thread Jan Mulder
On 15-01-16 05:59, Miika Turkia wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Jan Mulder wrote: Rick, On 14-01-16 21:56, Rick Walsh wrote: Jan, On 14 Jan 2016 19:52, "Jan Mulder" wrote: Tried the latest (655) version ( from google play) and I am getting

pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-14 Thread Jan Mulder
Tried the latest (655) version ( from google play) and I am getting very different results on 3 android devices. 1) 5" phone, android 5.1.1, cyanogenmod 12.1 (very latest daily). - entering cloud credentials and loading cloud data works correctly - same session, immediate SIGSEGV follows. Only

Re: pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-14 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:52:17AM +0100, Jan Mulder wrote: > Tried the latest (655) version ( from google play) and I am getting very > different results on 3 android devices. > > 1) 5" phone, android 5.1.1, cyanogenmod 12.1 (very latest daily). > > - entering cloud credentials and loading

Re: pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-14 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:12:16PM +, John Smith wrote: > Sizing is also still hit and miss on the dive profile. When I start up, the > first window places the profile in the bottom right corner of the window. Go > back to the divelist and choose another dive and its correct about 95% of the

Re: pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-14 Thread Miika Turkia
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Jan Mulder wrote: > Rick, > > On 14-01-16 21:56, Rick Walsh wrote: > > Jan, > > On 14 Jan 2016 19:52, "Jan Mulder" wrote: >> >> Tried the latest (655) version ( from google play) and I am getting very >> different results

Re: pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-14 Thread Rick Walsh
Jan, On 14 Jan 2016 19:52, "Jan Mulder" wrote: > > Tried the latest (655) version ( from google play) and I am getting very different results on 3 android devices. > > 1) 5" phone, android 5.1.1, cyanogenmod 12.1 (very latest daily). > > - entering cloud credentials and

Re: pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-14 Thread Jan Mulder
Rick, On 14-01-16 21:56, Rick Walsh wrote: Jan, On 14 Jan 2016 19:52, "Jan Mulder" > wrote: > > Tried the latest (655) version ( from google play) and I am getting very different results on 3 android devices. > > 1) 5" phone, android 5.1.1,

Re: pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-14 Thread Adric Norris
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Jan Mulder wrote: > Tried the latest (655) version ( from google play) and I am getting very > different results on 3 android devices. > I don't see the new app listed on Google Play... just the original (companion) app. Do you have to opt

Re: pre beta test subsurface-mobile 655

2016-01-14 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 6:43 AM, Adric Norris wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Jan Mulder > wrote: > Tried the latest (655) version ( from google play) and I am getting very > different results on 3 android