Re: Suunto EON sample interval

2015-04-30 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Apr 30, 2015 06:51, Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com wrote:

 Interestingly it seems that these events record the previous depth,
 not the current. Is EON recording only the event, no depth and your
 importer adds the depth there?

So the eon steel protocol is fairly good, and it doesn't have the
traditional fixed samples at all. Instead it has update packets which day
things like 10240 milliseconds have passed and cylinder sensor #1 is now
123 bar. If the depth hasn't changed it just won't get updated.

So you don't see a sample that updates everything, although there are
update packets that update several fields at once. One of the more common
update packets updates time, depth, temperature and deco state all
together, for example.

So it's not that the importer adds the depth. Is literally that the eon
steel bar sends this data has changed. If the eon decides that some piece
of information hasn't changed enough to report about, it will just not
bother to update it.

(Other dive computer protocols tend to be delta-compressed too, but tend to
have a more fixed format that often always updates depth, for example)

   Linus
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface


Re: Suunto EON sample interval

2015-04-30 Thread Miika Turkia
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:

 On Apr 29, 2015 20:25, Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com wrote:

 I am looking at a log from Suunto EON  Steel and it seems that it
 generally has a 10 second sample interval.

 No. The eon steel gives time difference in the samples, and they are not ten
 seconds apart, they are given in *milliseconds* and while close to ten
 seconds they are not exactly that. I have the logs, but am not in front of
 my computer right now.

OK, so the drifting I see on our samples is due to this roughly ten
second interval spiced up with millisecond precision.

 So not only are things not at an even second to begin with, there are events
 that happen outside of the regular samples that may have timestamps that
 change things even more.

Interestingly it seems that these events record the previous depth,
not the current. Is EON recording only the event, no depth and your
importer adds the depth there?

 My eon importer keeps track of the time in milliseconds internally (it
 really has to - ask the times are incremental and in that format) but then
 exposes them in seconds (because that's the same format, and the
 libdivecomputer interface).

 So you'll never see the traditional every x seconds behavior.

Thanks, this explains quite a bit, but we will loose some precision
when exporting to interval based logs (e.g. divelogs.de).  But I don't
think this will be significant to worry about.

miika
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface


Re: How about 4.4.2?

2015-04-30 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:20:31AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Robert Helling wrote:
  Dirk,
  
   On 30.04.2015, at 18:05, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
   
   If no one has anything else they want me to add I'll finish my testing and
   then just cut the release and move back to looking at 4.5 :-]
  
  my suggestion would be to wait for Miika to come up with something for
  the dialogs.de export (the sample interval).
 
 Reasonable suggestion, but I haven't seen anything that indicates there's
 a clear path to a fix right now... Once Miika reemerges from his dives
 he'll have to comment :-)

In the meantime, for those on Windows, I put a binary up for testing
(internal version is inconsistent with the filename, I know)
http://subsurface-divelog.org/downloads/daily/subsurface-4.4.2-RC1.exe

/D
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface


[PATCH 1/3] Set EON Steel sample interval to 10s on

2015-04-30 Thread Miika Turkia
This sets the Suunto EON Steel sample interval to 10 seconds when
exporting to divelogs.de.

Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com
---
 xslt/divelogs-export.xslt | 42 +-
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt b/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt
index 5752a44..904c893 100644
--- a/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt
+++ b/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt
@@ -206,29 +206,37 @@
 /xsl:variable
 
 SAMPLEINTERVAL
-  xsl:variable name=first
-xsl:call-template name=time2sec
-  xsl:with-param name=time
-xsl:value-of select=node()/sample[1]/@time/
-  /xsl:with-param
-/xsl:call-template
-  /xsl:variable
-  xsl:variable name=second
-xsl:call-template name=time2sec
-  xsl:with-param name=time
-xsl:value-of select=node()/sample[2]/@time/
-  /xsl:with-param
-/xsl:call-template
-  /xsl:variable
   xsl:choose
-xsl:when test=$manual = 0
-  xsl:value-of select=$second - $first/
+xsl:when test=divecomputer/@model = 'Suunto EON Steel'
+  xsl:text10/xsl:text
 /xsl:when
 xsl:otherwise
-  xsl:value-of select=60/
+  xsl:variable name=first
+xsl:call-template name=time2sec
+  xsl:with-param name=time
+xsl:value-of select=node()/sample[1]/@time/
+  /xsl:with-param
+/xsl:call-template
+  /xsl:variable
+  xsl:variable name=second
+xsl:call-template name=time2sec
+  xsl:with-param name=time
+xsl:value-of select=node()/sample[2]/@time/
+  /xsl:with-param
+/xsl:call-template
+  /xsl:variable
+  xsl:choose
+xsl:when test=$manual = 0
+  xsl:value-of select=$second - $first/
+/xsl:when
+xsl:otherwise
+  xsl:value-of select=60/
+/xsl:otherwise
+  /xsl:choose
 /xsl:otherwise
   /xsl:choose
 /SAMPLEINTERVAL
+
 xsl:for-each select=divecomputer[1]/sample
   xsl:choose
 xsl:when test=$manual = 1 and @time != '0:00 min'
-- 
2.1.0

___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface


[PATCH 3/3] Select only meaningful samples for divelogs.de export

2015-04-30 Thread Miika Turkia
The logic to select samples from EON Steel for divelogs.de export is the
following:
- Ignore sample at time zero, as that is surface, and the second odd
  sample contains information we are interested in
- Grab the second sample, first sample with pressure and temperature
  readings
- Grab the third sample - grand parent is 0, thus our first interval
  sample
- Grab the samples when the predecessor (or grand parent) is at least 10
  seconds away

This logic seems to produce reasonable results when exporting EON Steel
logs to divelogs.de. Naturally there might be corner cases, that are not
taken into account, but this basic logic seems reasonable in normal
cases. (Unfortunately analysis is done based on a single dive.)

Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com
---
 xslt/divelogs-export.xslt | 47 ++-
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt b/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt
index f231060..f912feb 100644
--- a/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt
+++ b/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt
@@ -290,11 +290,48 @@
   !--  name select={concat(@time, ' - ', 
preceding-sibling::sample[1]/@time)}/--
 /xsl:when
 xsl:otherwise
-  SAMPLE
-DEPTH
-  xsl:value-of select=substring-before(./@depth, ' ')/
-/DEPTH
-  /SAMPLE
+  xsl:choose
+!-- Suunto EON Steel special case --
+xsl:when test=$special = 1
+  xsl:variable name=cur
+xsl:call-template name=time2sec
+  xsl:with-param name=time
+xsl:value-of select=@time/
+  /xsl:with-param
+/xsl:call-template
+  /xsl:variable
+  xsl:variable name=prev
+xsl:call-template name=time2sec
+  xsl:with-param name=time
+xsl:value-of select=preceding-sibling::sample[1]/@time/
+  /xsl:with-param
+/xsl:call-template
+  /xsl:variable
+  xsl:variable name=prevprev
+xsl:call-template name=time2sec
+  xsl:with-param name=time
+xsl:value-of select=preceding-sibling::sample[2]/@time/
+  /xsl:with-param
+/xsl:call-template
+  /xsl:variable
+  xsl:choose
+xsl:when test=$cur - $prev gt;= 10 or $prev = 0 or 
$prevprev = 0
+  SAMPLE
+DEPTH
+  xsl:value-of select=substring-before(./@depth, ' ')/
+/DEPTH
+  /SAMPLE
+/xsl:when
+  /xsl:choose
+/xsl:when
+xsl:otherwise
+  SAMPLE
+DEPTH
+  xsl:value-of select=substring-before(./@depth, ' ')/
+/DEPTH
+  /SAMPLE
+/xsl:otherwise
+  /xsl:choose
 /xsl:otherwise
   /xsl:choose
 /xsl:for-each
-- 
2.1.0

___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface


[PATCH 2/3] Use variable to track special handling of DCs

2015-04-30 Thread Miika Turkia
Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com
---
 xslt/divelogs-export.xslt | 11 ++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt b/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt
index 904c893..f231060 100644
--- a/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt
+++ b/xslt/divelogs-export.xslt
@@ -205,9 +205,18 @@
   /xsl:choose
 /xsl:variable
 
-SAMPLEINTERVAL
+!-- Test if dive computer requires special handling --
+xsl:variable name=special
   xsl:choose
 xsl:when test=divecomputer/@model = 'Suunto EON Steel'
+  xsl:text1/xsl:text
+/xsl:when
+  /xsl:choose
+/xsl:variable
+
+SAMPLEINTERVAL
+  xsl:choose
+xsl:when test=$special = 1
   xsl:text10/xsl:text
 /xsl:when
 xsl:otherwise
-- 
2.1.0

___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface


Re: How about 4.4.2?

2015-04-30 Thread Miika Turkia
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Robert Helling wrote:
 Dirk,

  On 30.04.2015, at 18:05, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
 
  If no one has anything else they want me to add I'll finish my testing and
  then just cut the release and move back to looking at 4.5 :-]

 my suggestion would be to wait for Miika to come up with something for
 the dialogs.de export (the sample interval).

 Reasonable suggestion, but I haven't seen anything that indicates there's
 a clear path to a fix right now... Once Miika reemerges from his dives
 he'll have to comment :-)

OK, I just sent a recommendation for handling this. Though the logic
might benefit from additional eyes.

miika
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface


Re: How about 4.4.2?

2015-04-30 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 05:50:26PM -0600, Miika Turkia wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
  On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Robert Helling wrote:
  Dirk,
 
   On 30.04.2015, at 18:05, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
  
   If no one has anything else they want me to add I'll finish my testing 
   and
   then just cut the release and move back to looking at 4.5 :-]
 
  my suggestion would be to wait for Miika to come up with something for
  the dialogs.de export (the sample interval).
 
  Reasonable suggestion, but I haven't seen anything that indicates there's
  a clear path to a fix right now... Once Miika reemerges from his dives
  he'll have to comment :-)
 
 OK, I just sent a recommendation for handling this. Though the logic
 might benefit from additional eyes.

I looked through them and the first two seem obvious. The third one is not
quite as clear but it does appear to make sense.

Linus has a bunch of dives on his Eon Steele. Maybe he can export them all
to divelogs.de then import them into a different file and then we can
compare if they still look sane...

I'll take the patches as they are and will push this to master (that makes
it easier for people to test). If this works as expected I can easily
cherry-pick them for 4.4.2

/D
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface


[PATCH] User manual: recreational dive planning

2015-04-30 Thread Willem Ferguson

Resend of patch that appears to have gone missing.
Kind regards,
willem


 Forwarded Message 
Subject:[PATCH] User manual: recreational dive planning
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:29:16 +0200
From:   Willem Ferguson willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za
Reply-To:   willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za
Organization:   University of Pretoria
To: Subsurface Mailing List subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org



Add text to user manual: Recreational dive planning
One figure has been added

Signed-off-by: willem ferguson willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za




From 06de96964ac734ad5cf0f804c6ca2dab666aeb0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: willem ferguson willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 10:25:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Add text to user manual: Recreational dive planning One
 figure has been added

Signed-off-by: willem ferguson willemfergu...@zoology.up.ac.za
---
 Documentation/images/rec_diveplan.jpg | Bin 0 - 43447 bytes
 Documentation/user-manual.txt | 105 +++---
 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/images/rec_diveplan.jpg

diff --git a/Documentation/images/rec_diveplan.jpg b/Documentation/images/rec_diveplan.jpg
new file mode 100644
index ..c09a9c2b165a6bec8411c0d64db509ec1e20f5ca
GIT binary patch
literal 43447
zcmb??2S8KJ($M-2|e^8V1UpuL2^3-ZAtdAibkhr758oL3#)2Efnbj7CItD7b(0
zL9kF1my+vyI;BY{r~ldvi8W_M@i%+Aj2?pY2eb0-S`OjA`u6##)ifI991PF@2_
z05Kty2ueUq1SKLRAtt3@qNE@vr#Mf?K+VL-#?6IbLvZj4UKHi!m*VF@h^dN8U6NN+
zQsfa)*HK65TvSk$KNSKZAtj|CqhO_^WR*uEkn;ayIOzcp`Zc?90H;Qz?2{eCFrCN
zU;;n@W$=~0R)EN;S=E67;yD}Zvsx+PF?||5D)-{L0|v?s^{Sx{4h`IG+)vrhxs
zv%Sft{!wiN$2fbl#;putl^VmeDa@yd}a21Fio-_KzYhf{mQKUBZ08v!H1{G;(7
zMX$US+6y8Vgpq;$e^L?yaDY^x!^5G@!TyY1GCo$2ZK0C+W-X6#%zQa1Lgd|h{=
zkyuG#LEj7jLdAikmr6t@0RSVT3JSObs)}Hb~2mRWYJS1(;9Bcu{b#*?V0|71)2*
zr?PKNs!LMtzJ4;NhNv#--dfgkGaOc_!Z+!%kS?j-)6+^wth?!5O4G2+XF|#@fUr
zcuc420Y+LeLFfep01$8j2ymZNXA-~^b8`!l|sg6Jm_n!M8Sp826Ee8{6mx0t6Kl
zU^?$$j|ST!If(8BuamBD4JcrZv6FSE!LJtT4)9;z;6lw4*6bdJ7E;cFHrzMh_qG6
zbD1IZ3O`8q%}NNEUv3ybulxE8QR~r@=D*|)L?DwzB=QdG53IIIU)Nq~IPI4R
z7kRG2WDs4*h5@vmlGa0oyst}!bl|1K%!`FH2iRmukoB)!y9)qtVAwCoEXmVgt
z_VZ2MRAHaF@Q)sv3?%+JRICJvC7Vh1O8A@)gy+V2oD3`LlI%CT2wfdBEbC$g*bl-
z#UC`Ulny+k^gM(_+_9(yYu{F4GMrLZGDAiExte9G=k4|3#Fy;{v+KJA$PGjcfc9
zR`~rG-Hc?+p0dVEtQ|gdd*bBT|P35bXy?4kVn0A3R4+Jy=;s(K8-X#;?H9P*r
zpf#R5Yj_jWii=1f)e$2NMT$^y9`sa^ZQ-e45Psa~=;%SdM1kDZ?B@?#2u0=$*9A#v
z1kqDp1Jw(`GqvZ{QK%$=-bK79GxUoQy`tk{kn86V(}+RZFvT^U9q(@t;X0=%Un
zL9!0cw1tRvtF+`xTWnkBs?3}hXMczUE%3Kq=01Kr05XE6arxrIA10(oAwEwd|O9t
zK-Euy?plX`l-(V0d|GGE(kyA$AF@71nhskV25(N$=dIOU6Qmy@aA3+VZ1P0ez
zoWN6=o%i-XfkbG4KL)n$x`VSi08_`K0^mtd#3`Zy|1C!YzeRk;YdDu_{a{@^4JiB
z6+wlrP0p|PZptQ6T)XI{-l1gkAeiv_uc7r-f^fWMzUvG;;$??(Wj0l@%e9tt
zOYHMJOljAPW#A(zwn--tQMwg{MX%Ep0w*6|1@1$nI*(1277MbTOxlwtStZcYK3
zJphm%0YHl~{4Cxn*8M{SXtnYYK`9(lN(R9)r~dF1?6NE?y+Ia6Cf61KwJ2r1?$L
zRspHJCo0`DNo#BKkOLYPS+o_ft?ECqtjzpSK9gFUDWdMZS^yA%5s#P83sqzR
z)U=fV)$d@byRPT@4;hd+ep{=SCLIS_w{)pX0YE9NkO()_rGV(YYn_+2Hz`wsj)x2
z#^SJ@N%P}JePy{ix@~=YT@F08PN^#89n2Mk=@5HaqNI80t^x^!V6`65VbV{VyBEk
zKq_kg7~H29*auW%#ibJx{x)qws0R9pgv{1EuU?j*YriL7Eup{%z`@2aQ0dGK4FJw$
z`~A3f3P6m4u7MB$i0*WJKY2n7^1{ycGQJog(*yWLkMnddXZ1zZ9h9w=rol(9Ce1
zWtB01c%e_b!J04J!rDbwhLd2n%^vWeRw{1O0y9K{3UWtBv-MKacP3;@D!4CI1I(F
zfk$N}_)8#Y#I*lf4$g~Yt2_cqB#HO!c9bY!*plAze%|e_86kn28rL~Cnb`^zsx_i
zudsd(15{c6l7w?Zs8CgT6SYxJDpoL~sCvi|5}MZWOi5aK1C|R?|KK3gzk=D$ED
zRa{3)lh=dryMBp~ZEJ`s+q*F}X{KV{G6;6Sxje3e08s}2+3#=RZhy8XHBY5FD51f
zG61i2bG0`zas;u3C$I={}UnCvjWqL=0SbFIS@$90mxuj;u0)iy%0d+X7^Ko4Bugd
z+Xo}Y75LCh5@o|yUu=pi_5P@v1ic@!oxrj0Ld?YAiE`bRZ`O7Z%3t|LV)BnSYu3
zuM^mR49rp;7o15yLo_N4=;599}YN`Ua5lvG#J3@+GIt-8OGlDygIiE{`--C+!#{O
z4IWx%qc0@kIWa9AzO5Ks3%)Dz@RUIGwZ-WTFp=auyZ?8YSKh+D7UqnK)rKH~H3o+g
zg0jbaV1D^1fILj;LNL4|9b=jD!fH;q4hIE4BELeRg=9Mgh0$fUkKHaN;OXY;
zagKtjuvo5Dtp8BP}z+LHA!|xEckNv*9ig;sAA4L!8CTwJzelIg8tItEDJWiKy_
zV@*fT7tMLAXp@VHDb=hXSk?*wU)q|{VFrjI8R)q)*niERtfA=|xcKL_EG3h%l5W
zk4C5xM`d5b1Wpl514^S^q7Z2Vp@ut?4#O;p?8FRwT5D{tS*+uwxRdLzo=ce%I}E
zF_%3rF1xF*qbpYVu?o%_L%nA*f2n*Nplf{07%K?v6K^D2SQS*rF~jF7@*nUPVP
zQ0HqmW~Ga!$TI)S(I75+PTrcWisZ85O6tmjhv(9cOtqhqn=kC}H|WHjnWTnlt!
zHJ6pU*6-SujcUJ8o@wHDwqeL(c2td426nuq4LVFaCvPks4mKHN}(MrT!O@s`zmL
zD}O_SeR6RtzD(BRZ@fr=RI#4LgRx5jv#CgbSKTB$mgAmfvtJOp_@WAbNOTFJmj
zhjTP5=XrMEej$R1@G$Hk86Dv1lN)G{v}s;vIcp)~26v6XHKjlAR$PkKSa{e$8
z_JOAe!|dA#r`3f;rtwMW5!{$dk8%r?oDohy7pThffK1hY!(klNnbPbLN$!Mi`=B
zxub87y=*?ttIchCyGN5U?@E4l!4I0G-Y8BtOFHAq@sRH5RYcw*}djJ4UMmEfyGG
zj141W2GZ6y1;CF*G~oJ(8`9I=3xHFg+JqJ8(EHHfD!Sa+b0107(#VIX#=~gCF$qI
zG61c9kD-v5ObEzYN~Q7IuVhV;dp6;3mdQih1^u7;${uNsT0ETlRx2H;{HSD^sM
zWdJ$0-L_v{;uQS_;AnnZADBjiHGqe!pfU{??NmAbpg29;a@tsDGsa;{xbkfL@K)
zr5215mSuFW@7F4$$|N@STjdaR%H)4+nZJu4U~jcMv#@@Gz%L7u~E+Z+`%eUGsG1
zC_(sT0_PnaQOVeba2vwEJoU^nzf63}cg}c0rM!I-2Q{5t~D~6#?TbRbC
z+Orj*VluHjzVxRRr+|AFI?yZuruUu7OW*^$VYXJHFy)Jn1=Ne=Q$NRI=Ysl*Lh@
z!=9q$xZuy^PVa8cT47Mz9Ev3PorrA_WQ`E5b_wp+WGezbN{9pw1rrt0x34@UXRk

Re: How about 4.4.2?

2015-04-30 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:26:57AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
 I just merged our libdc branches with the latest upstream from
 libdivecomputer. More precisely, Subsurface-4.4 branch was merged, but
 Subsurface-testing was rebased, so that one will require a force pull. Jef
 has done some good work recently and added support for a few more dive
 computers.
 
 So if I were to make a 4.4.2 release with the latest libdivecomputer code
 included... are there any other fixes in master that I absolutely should
 back port?
 
 I know that I'd take a couple of my Uemis fixes as Uemis support in 4.4.1
 is actually rather broken :-(
 
 Anything else?

No one? In that case 4.4.2 will be really easy to do... I have the latest
libdivecomputer state merged in the Subsurface-4.4 branch of
git.subsurface-divelog.org/ldc and have all the things I want to include
in 4.4.2 in the v4.4-branch of Subsurface.

I don't think there is a point in making a test binary for this... No one
ever seems to test the Uemis support (and that clearly included myself in
the case of 4.4 - I will test a multi part download on Windows with this
one before releasing it), and the rest is just libdivecomputer changes...

If no one has anything else they want me to add I'll finish my testing and
then just cut the release and move back to looking at 4.5 :-]

/D
___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface


Re: How about 4.4.2?

2015-04-30 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Robert Helling wrote:
 Dirk,
 
  On 30.04.2015, at 18:05, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote:
  
  If no one has anything else they want me to add I'll finish my testing and
  then just cut the release and move back to looking at 4.5 :-]
 
 my suggestion would be to wait for Miika to come up with something for
 the dialogs.de export (the sample interval).

Reasonable suggestion, but I haven't seen anything that indicates there's
a clear path to a fix right now... Once Miika reemerges from his dives
he'll have to comment :-)

/D

___
subsurface mailing list
subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org
http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface