Re: How about 4.4.2?
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:26:36AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: On May 1, 2015, at 09:09, Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:26:57AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: I just merged our libdc branches with the latest upstream from libdivecomputer. More precisely, Subsurface-4.4 branch was merged, but Subsurface-testing was rebased, so that one will require a force pull. Jef has done some good work recently and added support for a few more dive computers. So if I were to make a 4.4.2 release with the latest libdivecomputer code included... are there any other fixes in master that I absolutely should back port? I know that I'd take a couple of my Uemis fixes as Uemis support in 4.4.1 is actually rather broken :-( Anything else? The multi-dive editing seems to be broken also in v4.4-branch. (Overwrites tags that are different from the displayed dive.) I think I fixed that... Wasn't that before 4.4? I'm on my phone, will look into this later. Definitely something we should fix for 4.4.2 OK, the XSLT fixes for the Eon Steel are in, as is the fix for the multi dive editing of tags. Latest translations are pulled. Anything else that I'm missing? Otherwise I'll cut 4.4.2 today. /D ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Re: How about 4.4.2?
Hi Dirk. El lun., 4 may. 2015 a las 16:18, Dirk Hohndel (d...@hohndel.org) escribió: Anything else that I'm missing? Otherwise I'll cut 4.4.2 today. As far as I can see, there are untranslated strings that aren't loaded on transifex, e.g. Find moved images in File dropdown list, and others. BTW, latest changes on user manual are untranslated too. Regards. Salva. ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Re: How about 4.4.2?
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:42:42PM +, Salvador Cuñat wrote: Hi Dirk. El lun., 4 may. 2015 a las 16:18, Dirk Hohndel (d...@hohndel.org) escribió: Anything else that I'm missing? Otherwise I'll cut 4.4.2 today. As far as I can see, there are untranslated strings that aren't loaded on transifex, e.g. Find moved images in File dropdown list, and others. BTW, latest changes on user manual are untranslated too. Are you talking the v4.4-branch? Or master. Master is not fully translated. And a while away from a release. I will issue a call for translations as that gets closer. v4.4-branch shouldn't have received new strings since 4.4.1 (doesn't mean I didn't mess it up, but it SHOULDN'T) /D ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Re: How about 4.4.2?
Hi Dirk. 2015-05-04 19:59 GMT+02:00 Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org: Are you talking the v4.4-branch? Or master. Master is not fully translated. And a while away from a release. I will issue a call for translations as that gets closer. v4.4-branch shouldn't have received new strings since 4.4.1 (doesn't mean I didn't mess it up, but it SHOULDN'T) You are right, I was talking about master. I apologize for this noise. Regards. Salva. ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Re: How about 4.4.2?
On May 1, 2015, at 09:09, Miika Turkia miika.tur...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:26:57AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: I just merged our libdc branches with the latest upstream from libdivecomputer. More precisely, Subsurface-4.4 branch was merged, but Subsurface-testing was rebased, so that one will require a force pull. Jef has done some good work recently and added support for a few more dive computers. So if I were to make a 4.4.2 release with the latest libdivecomputer code included... are there any other fixes in master that I absolutely should back port? I know that I'd take a couple of my Uemis fixes as Uemis support in 4.4.1 is actually rather broken :-( Anything else? The multi-dive editing seems to be broken also in v4.4-branch. (Overwrites tags that are different from the displayed dive.) I think I fixed that... Wasn't that before 4.4? I'm on my phone, will look into this later. Definitely something we should fix for 4.4.2 /D ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Re: How about 4.4.2?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:26:57AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: I just merged our libdc branches with the latest upstream from libdivecomputer. More precisely, Subsurface-4.4 branch was merged, but Subsurface-testing was rebased, so that one will require a force pull. Jef has done some good work recently and added support for a few more dive computers. So if I were to make a 4.4.2 release with the latest libdivecomputer code included... are there any other fixes in master that I absolutely should back port? I know that I'd take a couple of my Uemis fixes as Uemis support in 4.4.1 is actually rather broken :-( Anything else? The multi-dive editing seems to be broken also in v4.4-branch. (Overwrites tags that are different from the displayed dive.) miika ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Re: How about 4.4.2?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 09:20:31AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Robert Helling wrote: Dirk, On 30.04.2015, at 18:05, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: If no one has anything else they want me to add I'll finish my testing and then just cut the release and move back to looking at 4.5 :-] my suggestion would be to wait for Miika to come up with something for the dialogs.de export (the sample interval). Reasonable suggestion, but I haven't seen anything that indicates there's a clear path to a fix right now... Once Miika reemerges from his dives he'll have to comment :-) In the meantime, for those on Windows, I put a binary up for testing (internal version is inconsistent with the filename, I know) http://subsurface-divelog.org/downloads/daily/subsurface-4.4.2-RC1.exe /D ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Re: How about 4.4.2?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Robert Helling wrote: Dirk, On 30.04.2015, at 18:05, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: If no one has anything else they want me to add I'll finish my testing and then just cut the release and move back to looking at 4.5 :-] my suggestion would be to wait for Miika to come up with something for the dialogs.de export (the sample interval). Reasonable suggestion, but I haven't seen anything that indicates there's a clear path to a fix right now... Once Miika reemerges from his dives he'll have to comment :-) OK, I just sent a recommendation for handling this. Though the logic might benefit from additional eyes. miika ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Re: How about 4.4.2?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 05:50:26PM -0600, Miika Turkia wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Robert Helling wrote: Dirk, On 30.04.2015, at 18:05, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: If no one has anything else they want me to add I'll finish my testing and then just cut the release and move back to looking at 4.5 :-] my suggestion would be to wait for Miika to come up with something for the dialogs.de export (the sample interval). Reasonable suggestion, but I haven't seen anything that indicates there's a clear path to a fix right now... Once Miika reemerges from his dives he'll have to comment :-) OK, I just sent a recommendation for handling this. Though the logic might benefit from additional eyes. I looked through them and the first two seem obvious. The third one is not quite as clear but it does appear to make sense. Linus has a bunch of dives on his Eon Steele. Maybe he can export them all to divelogs.de then import them into a different file and then we can compare if they still look sane... I'll take the patches as they are and will push this to master (that makes it easier for people to test). If this works as expected I can easily cherry-pick them for 4.4.2 /D ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Re: How about 4.4.2?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:26:57AM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: I just merged our libdc branches with the latest upstream from libdivecomputer. More precisely, Subsurface-4.4 branch was merged, but Subsurface-testing was rebased, so that one will require a force pull. Jef has done some good work recently and added support for a few more dive computers. So if I were to make a 4.4.2 release with the latest libdivecomputer code included... are there any other fixes in master that I absolutely should back port? I know that I'd take a couple of my Uemis fixes as Uemis support in 4.4.1 is actually rather broken :-( Anything else? No one? In that case 4.4.2 will be really easy to do... I have the latest libdivecomputer state merged in the Subsurface-4.4 branch of git.subsurface-divelog.org/ldc and have all the things I want to include in 4.4.2 in the v4.4-branch of Subsurface. I don't think there is a point in making a test binary for this... No one ever seems to test the Uemis support (and that clearly included myself in the case of 4.4 - I will test a multi part download on Windows with this one before releasing it), and the rest is just libdivecomputer changes... If no one has anything else they want me to add I'll finish my testing and then just cut the release and move back to looking at 4.5 :-] /D ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Re: How about 4.4.2?
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Robert Helling wrote: Dirk, On 30.04.2015, at 18:05, Dirk Hohndel d...@hohndel.org wrote: If no one has anything else they want me to add I'll finish my testing and then just cut the release and move back to looking at 4.5 :-] my suggestion would be to wait for Miika to come up with something for the dialogs.de export (the sample interval). Reasonable suggestion, but I haven't seen anything that indicates there's a clear path to a fix right now... Once Miika reemerges from his dives he'll have to comment :-) /D ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
How about 4.4.2? [was Re: new Windows 4.4.1 binary is up]
I just merged our libdc branches with the latest upstream from libdivecomputer. More precisely, Subsurface-4.4 branch was merged, but Subsurface-testing was rebased, so that one will require a force pull. Jef has done some good work recently and added support for a few more dive computers. So if I were to make a 4.4.2 release with the latest libdivecomputer code included... are there any other fixes in master that I absolutely should back port? I know that I'd take a couple of my Uemis fixes as Uemis support in 4.4.1 is actually rather broken :-( Anything else? /D On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:02:22PM -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: Didn't want to go through the pain of calling it 4.4.2 - and the only difference is that uploads to Divelogs.de with non-ascii home path now seem to work. Rainer, if you have any other users who complained about that... this might be the solution. /D ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
