Re: Feedback for user manual: remove Facebook integration

2019-02-06 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Feb 6, 2019, at 3:43 AM, Willem Ferguson > wrote: > > I am removing all traces of the Facebook integration from the user manual. > Before I do that I need confirmation that the "Share on" option in the main > menu is permanently gone. There are

Re: Facebook integration - I'm considering to completely remove this feature

2019-01-31 Thread Chirana Gheorghita Eugeniu Theodor
I am tottaly for ditching the feature. I see no sense in puttong efort and time in this. On Thu, Jan 31, 2019, 22:58 Dirk Hohndel So Facebook just triggered a review of our Facebook integration (because > the best > way to deal with the fact that you are selling out the privacy of your &

Re: Facebook integration - I'm considering to completely remove this feature

2019-01-31 Thread Lubomir I. Ivanov
PSA: i've sent a PR to remove the Facebook feature from Subsurface: https://github.com/Subsurface-divelog/subsurface/pull/1958 lubomir -- ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org

Re: Facebook integration - I'm considering to completely remove this feature

2019-01-31 Thread Monty Taylor
On 1/31/19 8:58 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: So Facebook just triggered a review of our Facebook integration (because the best way to deal with the fact that you are selling out the privacy of your users is to... never mind... I'm sure this makes sense). Our app failed every step of their review

Re: Facebook integration - I'm considering to completely remove this feature

2019-01-31 Thread Rick Walsh
heeft Dirk Hohndel het > volgende geschreven: > > > > So Facebook just triggered a review of our Facebook integration (because > the best > > way to deal with the fact that you are selling out the privacy of your > users is to... never > > mind... I'm sure this makes

Re: Facebook integration - I'm considering to completely remove this feature

2019-01-31 Thread Martin de Weger
red a review of our Facebook integration (because the > best > way to deal with the fact that you are selling out the privacy of your users > is to... never > mind... I'm sure this makes sense). > > Our app failed every step of their review, likely because they have no >

Facebook integration - I'm considering to completely remove this feature

2019-01-31 Thread Dirk Hohndel
So Facebook just triggered a review of our Facebook integration (because the best way to deal with the fact that you are selling out the privacy of your users is to... never mind... I'm sure this makes sense). Our app failed every step of their review, likely because they have no bleeping

Re: [PATCH] User-manual: Facebook integration

2015-02-02 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:23:41AM +0200, Willem Ferguson wrote: Subject: [PATCH] User-manual: Add text and images for Facebook integration 5 images are changed and four more are added. Dirk, please read the paragraph marked *Important* to make sure it does not constitute utter rubbish. I

Re: [PATCH] User-manual: Facebook integration

2015-02-02 Thread Willem Ferguson
On 02/02/2015 17:13, Dirk Hohndel wrote: I would never call something you contribute utter rubbish. You must be confusing me with someone else :-) Unfortunately the first part of the paragraph is what I WISH we did but haven't figured out how to do, and the second part of the paragraph is...

Re: please test Facebook integration

2015-01-31 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On January 31, 2015 6:39:26 AM Joakim Bygdell j.bygd...@gmail.com wrote: One thing I noticed is that you have to be really, really careful with where you end up with the mouse pointer or the information field might obscure a large portion of the image. Especially if you have it show a lot of

please test Facebook integration

2015-01-30 Thread Dirk Hohndel
I have pushed a few patches that make Facebook integration work for me. This may not be the pinnacle of amazing UI design, but it's much better than what was there. As I mentioned in my earlier post, I still think we may want to protect this with a pin, but at least for a beta version this should

Facebook integration

2015-01-01 Thread Salvador Cuñat
Happy New Year, everybody. Don't know if this is as it's supposed to be, but every time I try fb integration I get the annoying message: Aplicación no configurada: Los desarrolladores de esta aplicación no la han configurado correctamente para el inicio de sesión de Facebook. Which means that

Re: Begin of Facebook Integration

2014-12-24 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Tomaz Canabrava tcanabr...@kde.org wrote: Em 24/12/2014 05:39, Robert C. Helling hell...@atdotde.de escreveu: On 24 Dec 2014, at 00:02, Tomaz Canabrava tcanabr...@kde.org wrote: Hi, It doesn't do anything yet besides logging in, saving user info

Re: Begin of Facebook Integration

2014-12-24 Thread Gaetan Bisson
Thanks Tomaz for the hard work; just a comment: [2014-12-24 13:28:58 -0200] Tomaz Canabrava: +#include QJsonDocument This requires Qt5. Should Qt4 builds still be supported? Cheers. -- Gaetan ___ subsurface mailing list

Re: Begin of Facebook Integration

2014-12-24 Thread Gaetan Bisson
Thanks Tomaz for the hard work; just a comment: [2014-12-24 13:28:58 -0200] Tomaz Canabrava: +#include QJsonDocument This requires Qt5. Should Qt4 builds still be supported? Cheers. -- Gaetan ___ subsurface mailing list

Re: Begin of Facebook Integration

2014-12-24 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On December 24, 2014 6:01:01 PM Gaetan Bisson gae...@fenua.org wrote: Thanks Tomaz for the hard work; just a comment: [2014-12-24 13:28:58 -0200] Tomaz Canabrava: +#include QJsonDocument This requires Qt5. Should Qt4 builds still be supported? I'm considering dropping Qt4 support for 4.4

Re: Begin of Facebook Integration

2014-12-24 Thread Gaetan Bisson
[2014-12-24 18:10:03 -0800] Dirk Hohndel: I'm considering dropping Qt4 support for 4.4 Ah, OK, I'll compile marble for Qt5 then. :) -- Gaetan ___ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org

Re: Begin of Facebook Integration

2014-12-23 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
now with patches. u_U On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Tomaz Canabrava tcanabr...@kde.org wrote: People, Facebook integration is still *extremely* experimental. that means that there's only one person that can login with subsurface yet: me. This is a pre-alpha code, nothing breaks, so