Re: [sugar] 9.1 Proposal: Top five performance problems

2008-10-25 Thread Walter Bender
For want it is worth, the team at the ministry of education in Peru said that 8.2 feels faster to them. The aggregate user perception vector is pointing in the right direction. -walter On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:04 PM,

Re: [sugar] Greetings from New Hampsire

2008-10-25 Thread Brendan R. Powers
I think a client/server git tree makes a lot of sense. When do you think the Sugar Labs git server will be available? - Original Message - From: David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: sugar@lists.laptop.org Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 9:30:57 PM

Re: [sugar] Greetings from New Hampsire

2008-10-25 Thread Bobby Powers
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think a client/server git tree makes a lot of sense. When do you think the Sugar Labs git server will be available? If you can't wait to get started (I don't know about sugar labs timetables), you can host it at

Re: [sugar] Greetings from New Hampsire

2008-10-25 Thread David Van Assche
Hi Brendan, If you are using LTSP as your thin client technology, the majority of your issues have already been taken care of. These include: - collaboration via ejabberd. - home folders stored on server so backups are just a server side script (rsync.) - activities can be installed through