Re: [sugar] from [geeks] : NodeBox art, animation and visualization via Python

Dave Crossland wrote: Ricardo Lafuente hello at ricardolafuente.com is working on a totally free software version of Nodebox. This is now available at www.tinkerhouse.net/shoebot/ ! :-) -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/from--geeks--%3A-NodeBox-art%2C-animation

Re: [sugar] AUTHORS and COPYING

On 09/01/2008, Jani Monoses [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In particular sugar-artwork includes a copy of the GPL, but the sources contain an LGPL and a BSD style licensed file as well. ... sugar, sugar-base and sugar-artwork provide a copy of GPL but the source file headers mention the LGPL. This

Re: [sugar] from [geeks] : NodeBox art, animation and visualization via Python

On 11/12/2007, Samuel Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone used NodeBox? It looks pretty fine. It uses Cocoa via puObjC; not an immediate candidate for sugarization. lol no, and depends very heavily on Cocoa, sadly. But a simple bundle along these lins would be fun... Ricardo

Re: [sugar] Royal National Institute for the Blind low-vision fonts now under GPL v3 - use in OLPC?

On 23/11/2007, Peter Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tiresias ... now available under GPL v3. ... I would like to recommend we consider redistributing these fonts with OLPC The lack of the Font Exception as recommended by the FSF is a small worry, and I suggest contacting RNIB about this :)

[sugar] Which Non-Latin Scripts Do Free Software Fonts Not Cover?

Hi All, I've just started the Masters degree in Typeface Design at the University of Reading (for which Gentium was a submitted project) and will be committing the next year to designing an original typeface design and producing a professionally high quality OpenType font, that will of course be