C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Nicholas Negroponte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For this reason, Sugar needs a wider basis, to run on more Linux platforms
and to run under Windows. We have been engaged in discussions with Microsoft
for several months, to explore a
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Nicholas Negroponte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For this reason, Sugar needs a wider basis, to run on more Linux platforms
and to run under Windows. We have been engaged in discussions with Microsoft
for several months, to explore a dual boot version of the XO.
Thanks for sharing your ideas about Sugar with us. Some comments follow below.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Nicholas Negroponte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For this reason, Sugar needs a wider basis, to run on more Linux platforms
and to run under Windows. We have been engaged in discussions
Thanks for talking with us.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Nicholas Negroponte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People keep asking me:
Yes, OLPC's commitment to Sugar has changed. It is now larger, not smaller.
Contrary to inferences drawn by Walter's departure, the press and venerable
sources
4 matches
Mail list logo
