On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:37:52PM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
I'm really not sure why I wrote this e-mail.
Thanks for writing it.
Maybe it's to say that even our easiest options for interoperability
are actually quite complex, fragile, and dangerous.
Worse is Better (I realize, based
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It seems to me that the points of controversy at Scott's datastore talk
primarily concerned the way data is stored. In particular, the Journal
requires the storage of a certain amount of metadata about each file, and
the way we store this metadata
2 matches
Mail list logo
