On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:34 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
>
> As the instigator of this Decision Panel business, I should attempt to
> clarify the idea. My goal is to make serving on the Oversight Board as
> unappealing as possible. Ideally, it should be _difficult_ to find seven
> people
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:07 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
>
> In general, I like what I see. I think somewhat more (and somewhat
> less) specific governance needs to be specified from what I see so far.
>
> Not all of these need to be addressed in a temporary working governance
> document, but do ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Gettys wrote:
| 3) The decision panel mechanism seems cumbersome, and fraught with
| political danger; if people don't believe the oversight board is being
| fair, they should get rid of the oversight board. There is the
| (possible) issue of how
> 2. Governance: One of the challenges that free and open-source
> projects face is the impact of governance on their community members:
> while FOSS licenses assure access to source code, that doesn't
> guarantee a successful project. A governance model can help ensure
> that the project is run i
4 matches
Mail list logo
