Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file

2007-12-12 Thread C. Scott Ananian
Incidentally, from my review of the bundlebuilder code, it appears that one of the reasons why MANIFEST files have been disappearing from bundles is that bundlebuilder has mechanisms to synthesize the MANIFEST from the git or svn repo contents. So in most cases, the developer does not need to expl

Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file

2007-12-12 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On Dec 11, 2007, at 1:12 , C. Scott Ananian wrote: > On Dec 8, 2007 7:18 PM, Christoph Derndorfer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Daniel and me are again having another weekend-jam working on the >> activity handbook and we've just spent the past half hour looking at >> different .xo packages from

Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file

2007-12-10 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
C. Scott Ananian schrieb: > On Dec 8, 2007 7:18 PM, Christoph Derndorfer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Daniel and me are again having another weekend-jam working on the >> activity handbook and we've just spent the past half hour looking at >> different .xo packages from the git-repository t

Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file

2007-12-10 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
Edward Cherlin schrieb: > On Dec 8, 2007 4:18 PM, Christoph Derndorfer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> Daniel and me are again having another weekend-jam working on the >> activity handbook >> > > Excellent. Does it have a Wiki page? Would someone put a link and a > brief d

Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file

2007-12-10 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Dec 8, 2007 7:18 PM, Christoph Derndorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniel and me are again having another weekend-jam working on the > activity handbook and we've just spent the past half hour looking at > different .xo packages from the git-repository to see how the MANIFEST > file inside t

Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file

2007-12-10 Thread Edward Cherlin
On Dec 8, 2007 4:18 PM, Christoph Derndorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > > Daniel and me are again having another weekend-jam working on the > activity handbook Excellent. Does it have a Wiki page? Would someone put a link and a brief description on the OLPC Publications page? Can I j

Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file

2007-12-10 Thread C. Scott Ananian
On Dec 8, 2007 7:38 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:18 , Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > > > So what I'm basically asking is what the exact requirements for the > > MANIFEST file are as activities seem to work regardless of what it > > contains. > > Currently,

Re: [sugar] status of MANIFEST file

2007-12-08 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On Dec 9, 2007, at 1:18 , Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > So what I'm basically asking is what the exact requirements for the > MANIFEST file are as activities seem to work regardless of what it > contains. Currently, the MANIFEST is not consulted at all when installing or running, an activity

[sugar] status of MANIFEST file

2007-12-08 Thread Christoph Derndorfer
Hey all, Daniel and me are again having another weekend-jam working on the activity handbook and we've just spent the past half hour looking at different .xo packages from the git-repository to see how the MANIFEST file inside the .xo package is being used. Results really vary, some activities