Hi All,
I've just started the Masters degree in Typeface Design at the
University of Reading (for which Gentium was a submitted project) and
will be committing the next year to designing an original typeface
design and producing a professionally high quality OpenType font, that
will of course be f
Hi,
On 20-okt-2007, at 20:49, Walter Bender wrote:
> 26. How-tos/documentation: A few groups have independently developed
> their own "how-tos" about using Sugar and the XOs. Christoph Derndofer
> and Eduardo Silva each took a stab at how-tos for using activities and
> Todd Kelsey and Val Scarlatt
Eben/Tomeu/Marco ,
This is with reference to incorporation of a feature (a post TR3 feature ,
targeted at FRS) which requires some re-thinking into the design of Journal
Integration of Measure Activity and is also a good (and important)
opportunity to look into the complete design of integration
> 1) Since many logs are going to be associated with one logging session, what
> is the best way to pack these log files and associate with the journal?
> Should one make a .zip file of all the log files ?
I think a zip file is a great choice, with the contents being a flat
list of text files whic
Arjun Sarwal writes:
> 1) Since many logs are going to be associated with one logging
> session, what is the best way to pack these log files and
> associate with the journal? Should one make a .zip file of
> all the log files ?
That's OK, but don't waste effort on compression.
Standards say you
> > 1) Since many logs are going to be associated with one logging
> > session, what is the best way to pack these log files and
> > associate with the journal? Should one make a .zip file of
> > all the log files ?
>
> That's OK, but don't waste effort on compression.
> Standards say you use the p
> > That's OK, but don't waste effort on compression.
> > Standards say you use the pax format, or at least
> > something like tar or cpio.
>
> Interesting point. Perhaps, with our filesystem, we should always
> prefer something other than zip for bundles? Tar would be a good
> pick.
It's also b
On 10/21/07, Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > That's OK, but don't waste effort on compression.
> > > Standards say you use the pax format, or at least
> > > something like tar or cpio.
> >
> > Interesting point. Perhaps, with our filesystem, we should always
> > prefer something ot
On 10/22/07, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/21/07, Albert Cahalan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The simplest format for audio data is an audio file.
> > Basic *.wav data is really simple. It's a 44-byte header
> > followed by the raw data.
>
> Obviously I know little about the .w
9 matches
Mail list logo