On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:06 AM, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How is the cursor pixmap currently set? Is there an existing function
in the sugar codebase to set the cursor pixmap?
No, we just use the gdk functions.
Marco
___
Sugar mailing
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running recent Joyride on my G1G1. When I request a shutdown, it
sometimes proceeds hands off. But sometimes, after the Sugar
shell has closed - nothing further seems to happen. On those
occasions, sometimes the
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
we have logic in the shell to limit launching activity of the same
type at the same time (i.e. before the first activity launch has been
completed). It seem to be that this is obsoleted by the new launch
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
we have logic in the shell to limit launching activity of the same
type at the same time (i.e. before the first activity launch has
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:54 AM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'm unsatisfied, too. Perhaps we can shorten the interval, but
better than that we should be actively attempting to detect failure
(how can we do this?) so that when a launch fails hard for some
reason, we can
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:19:46AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Brian Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brilliant work, Erik! I had a chance to play with your first working
hand scroll, and
= New requests =
The intro screen should be RTL in RTL locales
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/3108
= Approved requests =
Battery indicator's icon fullness inconsistent with indicator %.
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/4208
Object chooser has wrong icon for 'cancel'
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7482
Running recent Joyride on my G1G1. When I request a shutdown, it
sometimes proceeds hands off. But sometimes, after the Sugar
shell has closed - nothing further seems to happen. On those
occasions, sometimes the ending-picture (with the don't do this
icons) is presented if I press
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 11:27 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running recent Joyride on my G1G1. When I request a shutdown, it
sometimes proceeds hands off. But sometimes, after the Sugar
shell has closed - nothing
marco pesenti gritti wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sugar devs:
This is a copy of my bug report for #447. I have completed a first pass
of the grab key implementation.
Have you considered implementing this at the X level? If so,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible for Sugar users to have an extensible profile? Currently,
this only encompasses nickname and colors, but are there plans to extend
this somehow?
I propose using a dictionary to
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:58:32 -0700,
Edward Cherlin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Yoshiki Ohshima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we could simulate a pendulum or a Newton's cradle? How do you
handle collisions?
Hi,
If you're interested in software for teaching children handwriting
(didactic handwriting), you can download it at
http://code.google.com/p/olpc-dhw/ or to look at my GSoC blog:
http://olpc-dhw.blogspot.com/
--
Julka
Juliana Lipkova web: http://ksp.sk/~julka ICQ: 292350370
There was an extensive discussion on this topic a while back on IRC, which I
unfortunately don't have a record of. There was also mention of this in the
mailing lists not too long ago, initiated by Morgan:
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-May/005895.html. Finally, I
brought this up
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 05:36:44AM -0400, Brian Jordan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like Brian's idea but felt similarly about the difficulty in deciding
which hand button executes which function. SHIFT-HAND is a good
solution, and
2008/7/14 Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There was an extensive discussion on this topic a while back on IRC, which I
unfortunately don't have a record of. There was also mention of this in the
mailing lists not too long ago, initiated by
Morgan:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:09 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/7/14 Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There was an extensive discussion on this topic a while back on IRC,
which I
unfortunately don't have a record of. There was also mention of this in
the
mailing lists not
Hi,
Me and Tomeu were discussing the way browse should handle
extensions/plugins and we came to the conclusion that really, it
should do this the same way firefox does it, thereby making it far
easier to make future extensions/plugins... Right now, xulrunner
already has a way of doing this
Otherwise how can we reasonable sort/group the activities in any way
that makes sense?
I suggested one (stupidly slow, but very general) approach based on the
Travelling Salesman problem. To recap:
Regard all activities as nodes in a fully connected graph. Let
activities state that they are
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They don't get it? Or they don't get how a single integer is supposed to be
sufficient, and therefor use their own methods? Do you have examples of
specific random and bogus strings we can look at to see what's been tried?
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Otherwise how can we reasonable sort/group the activities in any way
that makes sense?
I suggested one (stupidly slow, but very general) approach based on the
Travelling Salesman problem. To recap:
Regard all
The way I see it, there are TWO kinds of items for which
compatibility needs to be provided -- executables + data :
* Executables : The problem arises from the quickness with which
some users (such as I) can switch operating system versions. I
sometimes have two different streams on my
Comments follow...
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:09 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
They don't get it? Or they don't get how a single integer is supposed to
be
sufficient, and therefor use their own methods?
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure this satisfies me. It might accurately handle the use case of
updating when upgrading, assuming that activity developers are very careful
to add extra info about compatibility into the .info file. It doesn't
As I have suggested before, I think that these sorts of checks also
matter enourmously to the quality of user experience that we'll be able
to provide when we start seriously attempting to provide 'easy code
sharing' features.
Michael
___
Sugar mailing
Please speak to me of your thoughts on the security implications of
making Browse extensible.
Thanks,
Michael
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
I agree with the signature approach. However, I don't really know what
happens when I have 37, 38, and 39 where 39 is a bugfix release of 37, and
39 is a brand new version...I'd prefer to see them ordered 37, 39, 38, to
coincide with the level of newness. This is something we will lose
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:34 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm not sure this satisfies me. It might accurately handle the use case
of
updating when upgrading, assuming that activity developers are very
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is still a whole bunch clearer than trying to convince someone
that version 5 is newer than version 10! (where 10 is a bugfix release to
what used to be version 4.)
You're undercutting your own points: what
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:41 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think this is still a whole bunch clearer than trying to convince
someone
that version 5 is newer than version 10! (where 10 is a bugfix
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read on our wiki that the version number was supposed to be monotonically
increasing. If that were the case, doing as you suggest isn't valid, as I
Who wrote this? Did they mean it to be taken this literally, or just
as
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was an extensive discussion on this topic a while back on IRC,
Version numbers are used to communicate API/ABI compat and degree/type
of changes to users. Later in this thread Eben suggests what everyone
else in the
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Martin Langhoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Version numbers are used to communicate API/ABI compat and degree/type
of changes to users. Later in this thread Eben suggests what everyone
else in the industry is using: major.minor - sounds good to me. Even
better -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Langhoff wrote:
| After
| all, if an activity writer wants to use Klingon characters for
| versioning, hey, let them go wild!
This is actually the key point. Currently, the versioning system is
embedded into the Glucose code itself, and our
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:18 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we're going to a 'dotted decimal' scheme, we
should use '.'.
...
Is 1.1 newer or older than 1.11?)
This is exactly the reason I think that 1-1 ... 1-11 is clearer (you're
right, colon is unworkable because it
I'd like to pose an alternative goal, inspired by your comment: Glucose
should never attempt to parse version strings. I believe that we can
accomplish this without sacrificing any of the user-facing behaviors that
we truly desire. The choice of an appropriate versioning scheme may then
be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jameson Chema Quinn wrote:
| It is desirable for Sugar to be able to compare versions and
| guess which one is newer.
Newer means more recent. If this capability is important to you, then
we may simply include a datestamp in each bundle, separate
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jameson Chema Quinn wrote:
| It is desirable for Sugar to be able to compare versions and
| guess which one is newer.
Newer means more recent. If this capability
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eben Eliason wrote:
| I guess the point here is that performing intelligent string comparisons on
| several of these schemes requires parsing the string. ;)
I would be happy to whip up a universal approximate ordering for version
strings in a few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jameson Chema Quinn wrote:
| It is desirable for Sugar to be able to compare versions and
| guess which one is newer.
Newer means more recent. If this capability is important to you, then
we may simply include a datestamp in each bundle,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be happy to whip up a universal approximate ordering for version
strings in a few lines of Python. My emphasis here is on _approximate_;
nothing should depend on precisely correct interpretation of version
=== Sugar Digest ===
1. Sugar Labs governance: There are still a few more loose ends to
deal with before we are officially members of the Software Freedom
Conservancy. In preparation, I've made a lot of changes on the
governance page. Please comment.
2. Leaning: There were some interesting
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 02:03 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Hello,
I discussed a bit with Michael how to integrate Sugar and OLPC release
processes. I'm going to summarize the outcoming here.
* SugarLabs should try to schedule his release a few months before the
OLPC release target
If, as is the current plan, multiple versions of
an activity can coexist on an XO, ...
Two use cases:
1. I have a journal object. I want to choose which activity to open it with.
I am presented with a multilevel menu: the top level has all activities
which open the mime type, the next level
Am 14.07.2008 um 05:48 schrieb WikiAdmin:
anonymous user 91.179.26.46 edited Presence Service D-Bus API
http://wiki.laptop.org/index.php?title=Presence_Service_D-Bus_APIdiff=0oldid=137835
This adds the GetBuddyByTelepathyHandle() and ListChannels() methods.
Should we document the PS version
45 matches
Mail list logo
