On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Launched XaoS-2 (on 766). The activity is being launched screen
pulsed and pulsed for a couple of minutes. I had definitely
concluded that it would *never* launch, and that this was the Sugar
launch timeout that kept
Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
we are using an old version of evince and poppler. Are there any
intentions to update?
Current poppler we use is 0.6 and the latest stable is 0.8
http://poppler.freedesktop.org/
And in jhbuild we use a custom evince branch
as you probably installed previously the Wikipedia activity, my guess
is that the jffs2 gc thread was taking most of the CPU.
If I understand correctly, this raises the possibility that other
actions performed *prior* to the launching of an Activity can
noticeably affect the time it takes to
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Gary C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 Sep 2008, at 17:13, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
A screenshot is at
http://dev.laptop.org/~sayamindu/Captura%20de%20pantalla_1.png
The code lives in Git:
Last night did a lot of activity launching (on 766). My overall
impression was that feedback by the system was way too slow. The
pulsing launch screen (which I like) was introduced to give
positive feedback to the person clicking on an activity's icon - but
the system was taking much too
C. Scott Ananian writes:
The response usually is that additional context is sufficient to
disambiguate tag sets, you don't actually need ordering. That is,
it's okay if a/b is indistinguishable from b/a -- in practice one
will really be c/a/b and the other will be b/a/d or whatever, and
you
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 09:52:24AM -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
Last night did a lot of activity launching (on 766). My overall
impression was that feedback by the system was way too slow.
In my experience the feedback is very fast (less than 1s to come up,
which is hard to ignore unless
Yeah, this sounds like something that should be added to the HIG.
Activities should strive to put up a screen as soon as they can, even
if it will take more time to fully present the UI or the content. I
opened #8739 to keep track of this, when I get a chance to get back
into the HIG.
- Eben
On
On 1 Oct 2008, at 13:49, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
as you probably installed previously the Wikipedia activity, my guess
is that the jffs2 gc thread was taking most of the CPU.
If I understand correctly, this raises the possibility that other
actions performed *prior* to the launching of an
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Gary C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1 Oct 2008, at 13:49, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
as you probably installed previously the Wikipedia activity, my guess
is that the jffs2 gc thread was taking most of the CPU.
If I understand correctly, this raises the
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Eben and other sugarites,
I'm trying to find a simple way to add some version support to the
journal, but for that I need to know what's the sweetest spot (no pun
intended) between value and complexity.
I'm thinking
Walter, could you elaborate on your comment?
My comment was in regard to the anticipated additional complexity we
may run into if/when we have versioning between multiple users, as
would be dictated by most of the bulletin board schemes. Not sure if
Tomeu's model will work, but it doesn't seem a
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walter, could you elaborate on your comment?
My comment was in regard to the anticipated additional complexity we
may run into if/when we have versioning between multiple users, as
would be dictated by most of the bulletin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I very much like Tomeu's version model, but I am also unsure whether I
have interpreted it correctly.
My feeling is that each object in the Journal is associated with a tree of
versions. The tree has one node with no ancestors: the root node, which
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 03:06:34PM -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
[many rhetorical questions]
dbus-send --session --print-reply --reply-timeout=2000 \
--type=method_call --dest=org.laptop.sugar.DataStore \
/org/laptop/sugar/DataStore
15 matches
Mail list logo
