Dear maintainers,
the next development release is tomorrow the 21th July. Please provide
source code
tarballs by the end of tomorrow for the following modules:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap#Glucose_Modules
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap#Glucose_Modules
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Shikhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use threads in my activity. However, the UI locks up
while the thread runs. Actually, it is somewhat strange what happens:
the thread is already initialized and running, waiting on a Queue for a
work
Here is some code which runs multiple threads successfully on an xo. Look
for ServerThread:
http://mediamods.com/public-svn/map-activity/Map.activity/map.py
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Shikhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to use threads in my activity. However, the UI
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works quite well here in a MP with last joyride. Just did some light
testing, though.
I've also tested it (lightly) on 3 machines running Joyride ~2170.
Tomeu
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for not answering,
Hmm? Both Tomeu and me answered.
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-July/016914.html
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-July/016951.html
and not updating the API doc,
The
Hi Shikar,
You might want to look at how James Simmons uses threads in his ReadEtexts
Activity to do speech synthesis using a thread too..
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=activities/readetexts;a=blob;f=ReadEtextsActivity.py;h=c8c7086a4dd9448a2f81b96150dcb551c6d5d217;hb=HEAD
Around line 56 or so...
Thank you for all the replies, I fixed the problem by simplifying things
a little, the code examples helped :-)
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 17.07.2008 um 07:37 schrieb Bert Freudenberg:
Am 17.07.2008 um 00:10 schrieb Tomeu Vizoso:
Marco has added a session manager to Sugar (in 8.2.0) that takes care
of telling activities to save their work because the
+1 for ring view... but as an every-activity-on-your-computer ring,
rather than by default having nothing shown, by default have every
activity shown.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Can I get a quick +1/-1 on this question related to
On 20 Jul 2008, at 13:40, Bobby Powers wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:19 AM, Tomeu Vizoso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Works quite well here in a MP with last joyride. Just did some light
testing, though.
I've also tested it (lightly) on 3 machines running Joyride ~2170.
Tomeu
On Sat,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Brian Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for ring view... but as an every-activity-on-your-computer ring,
rather than by default having nothing shown, by default have every
activity shown.
You should never have nothing in the ring by default. If you
reproduced
+1 for the ring
(i am new to open source, so please be patient with me)
i know this question doesn't really belong here, but: why was the sugar UI
changed? can i find a discussion about this anywhere? the new version lost
the frame, didn't it? at least it'S not there in my sugar jhbuild env.
Take a look at:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/
XO_Troubleshooting_AV#Errors_communicating_with_the_camera
The majority of these problems are due to a latch on the flex cable
connector coming loose.
If you disassemble the laptop, and find that it was due to another
source, pleased either
add it
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Martin Dengler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) whether anyone thinks this is too invasive to get in to Sucrose
0.82 / OLPC 8.2.0; and
Yeah, it sounds too invasive to me, I'd rather put some good thinking
and land it in the next release cycle. What user visible
Hello,
I noticed several inconsistencies in the way we deal with tickets,
which makes working with trac harder than it should be. Here is an
attempt to describe the workflow from the Sugar point of view:
1 Developer looks for the first time at a ticket. If the problem is
obvious, switch action
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:45:16AM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Martin Dengler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) whether anyone thinks this is too invasive to get in to Sucrose
0.82 / OLPC 8.2.0; and
Yeah, it sounds too invasive to me
Just to point out:
Am 20.07.2008 um 14:14 schrieb Alexander Ortner:
+1 for the ring
(i am new to open source, so please be patient with me)
i know this question doesn't really belong here, but: why was the
sugar UI changed? can i find a discussion about this anywhere? the
new version lost the frame,
17 matches
Mail list logo
