http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10074298-56.html?part=rsssubj=newstag=2547-1_3-0-20
Was a experiment (informal) with a girl with 8 years old wich used olpc with
Sugar an Windows...
:)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Carlos mauro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/10/26
Subject: Niños
Hello,
I wrote an helper script to do release of modules using auto* or
bundlebuilder. It's in the sugar-tools git repository:
git://dev.laptop.org/users/marco/sugar-tools
Just run the release script inside your module directory and it should:
* Bump version, tag and push to git. (You can use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It was a very poor experiment and the article had a number of items
of misinformation. The author of the article did not take advantage
of the fact that she had 2 XOs . She did not boot both in Sugar to
observe the collaboration capabilities of Sugar and
Hi Albert,
I think you're totally wrong with respect to windows and
collaboration. It has *NOTHING* like sugars collaborative capabilities. What
program allows allows two children to start jointly writing a document with two
clicks on a mouse?
Cheers
Martin
-Original
Albert,
I was not shouting down criticism. I was pointing out the inherent
fallacy of the experiment.
File sharing is not an active real time collaboration tool by any
means. In sugar multiple children can work on the same write
document, paint document, etc. at the same time and a copy
I haven't seen decent educational software for any platform.
That includes Sugar and Mac OS. Probably this means that the
concept itself is defective.
I am sorely tempted to agree with that. We really should rethink the
idea of what « educational software » is and what it is supposed to
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Our company and developers are interested in getting involved with the
development community for Sugar. We deploy Linux desktop solutions in schools
in the United States via thin client and fat client
Hi Robert,
On 27.10.2008 00:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 26, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Booting both into Windows would allow file sharing.
Compared to what Sugar does, file sharing is very reliable.
It works with **all** programs, without any developer effort.
It's
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 7:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
File sharing is not an active real time collaboration tool by any means.
Right. Active real-time collaboration is nice, and I wish my
own editor had it, but I think you're overvaluing it greatly.
In sugar multiple
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
On 27.10.2008 00:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 26, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Means of file sharing can be setup fairly easily in Sugar if you want
to move raw files around.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27.10.2008 00:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 26, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Means of file sharing can be setup fairly easily in Sugar if you want
to move raw files around. Currently file
11 matches
Mail list logo
