On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Eben Eliason eben.elia...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone -
The Human Interface Guidelines [1] have been stagnant for some time,
and I'm starting an initiative to remedy the situation. This effort,
as I see it, has two components: 1) update the contents of
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Eben Eliason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are the details:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/DesignTeam/Meetings#Thursday_December_4.2C_2008_-_15.00_.28UTC.29
Apologies for the late reminder. In the back of my head I thought
that was automated now, but either I'm
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Sebastian Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I realize I should have jumped into this discussion earlier. Please
excuse me, I've just put myself thru an intense matrixesque
self-learning weeks around learning communities, communities of
practice, community
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Riccardo Lucchese
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is `zero olpc contractors working full time on Sugar' ?
Sorry about the lack of clarity, I somehow assumed everyone knew about this
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Riccardo Lucchese
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is `zero olpc contractors working full time on Sugar' ?
Sorry about the lack of clarity, I somehow assumed everyone knew about this
I am adding debian-olpc-devel to this thread. They will most likely
have the most experience with debian specific issues.
david
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Sascha Silbe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Not
I would like to thank everyone who contributed to make SugarCamp II a
success. From an organizational and personal perspective I was hard
on a lot of people. Hard, but I hope equally hard on everyone.
OLPC and SL are working on hard problems. Many of the problems we are
struggling with are
forward. How
does that sound?
olpc-dev list emails are kind of over my head
Yeah, we should understand better this issue. Is a coder-newbies
mailing list a valid suggestion?
where are things? (on wiki, etc)
David Farning is working on this, following a never ending list of
complaints
As you can see, the schedule for sugarcamp has been updated.
The primary emotion that I felt when waking this morning was
disappointment. It seems unfortunate SL and OLPC were able to
assemble such a collection of smart, passionate, and committed
individuals who were unable to accomplish
Does anyone have room for Adam for the weekend.
david
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Adam Floss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have a spare couch?
Adam
This is probably sent while in transit
On Nov 18, 2008, at 9:45, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like Adam Hyde
The Sugar developers have started a upstream list for sugar
development issues that are not OLPC specific. If you are interested,
please feel free to join.
thanks
david
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
Thanks Ivan
david
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Ivan Krstić
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:59 PM, David Farning wrote:
The Sugar developers have started a upstream list for sugar
development issues that are not OLPC specific. If you are interested,
please feel free
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
Great!
I can handle the translation between the spanish teachers and the french
developers if the need arises.
Podré apoyar las comunicaciones entre los profesores de Uruguay, Panama y Peru
por una parte, y los
Has anyone gotten a chance to look at Gnome Mobile and how it might
serve as a platform for Sugar. The development rate is starting to
pickup.
I am curious if the services and APIs provided by Gnome Mobile will
meet Sugar's needs. The stated goal is being a subset of gnome while
being small
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:43 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Marco and me compared our schedules for the next week trip and thought
that, as we arrive a bit late on Sunday, may be a good idea to meet
somewhere in Cambridge for dinner.
So, what about meeting for having some
to fund its own operations (Walter Bender)
- How SugarLabs is going to govern itself (Walter Bender, David Farning?)
- How SugarLabs is partnering with other organizations (David Farning)
- etc, you get the idea.
I think most of those talks could give material for discussion for at
least half
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:11 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:07 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this schedule seem reasonable to others? (Esp. those I've
pencilled in for talks?) If you are going to be in town, made a 9.1
proposal
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's a good idea and would like to hear more about how we
could open Sugar up to higher levels of interoperability.
I'm also quite curious about how Sugar runs in a
Hey Mel,
Sounds like a great event. I will be in Boston the weekend before and the
weekend after the meeting, so I can help out where ever you need.
Thanks
david
Also, a public thanks to Mel for providing me a place to stay during the
event!
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Mel Chua [EMAIL
Yoshiki.
I'll forward this information to the Ubuntu Squeak maintainer.
Do you know who I should talk to about requesting that
http://www.squeak.org/SqueakLicense/ be update to reflect this information?
thanks
david
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:55 AM, Yoshiki Ohshima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edubuntu held a IRC planning meeting that was well attended by Sugar.
As David VA pointed out in an earlier thread, Edubuntu has had a complicated
history. (who hasn't)
Hopefully, we can use some Sugar/Ubuntu SugarTeam/LTSP/Edubuntu synergy to
help reignite interest in Edubuntu. Much of the
it to an mit license?
1. http://www.squeak.org/SqueakLicense/
2. http://netjam.org/squeak/contributors/missingSignatories
david
On 11/6/08, Bert Freudenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05.11.2008, at 13:55, David Farning wrote:
.One sticking point was the availability of squeak on Ubuntu
Thanks Edward,
I see that you have cced Yoshiki and Robin. If they don't catch this
thread, I follow up with them.
thanks
david
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Edward Cherlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:35 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hello,
we met to discuss schedule and scope of the meeting today. Tomeu,
Marco, Scott, Mel, Michael, Samuel was present.
== Schedule ==
We came up with two possible schedules, we haven't made a call about
which
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
David,
Thanks for writing this up. Comments/questions in line.
---Membership Guidelines---
Any contributor who is active in helping Sugar Labs accomplish its
mission
is eligible for membership.
It would be
In light of the cancellation of the formal XO meeting that was tentatively
scheduled for November. It make sense to have an informal community meeting
instead.
Micheal Stone and C. Scott have taken the initiative to start arranging a
community SugarCamp. I would like to leverage on their work
to set up a course please let me or David Farning know.nbsp;
So far our plans are to use it support collaboration by nontechnical groups
that maybe more used to a web based forum then a mailing list.nbsp; However,
its available for repositories and other uses as well.nbsp;
It is being hosted
.
thanks
david
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:19 AM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It looks like our friends at Ubuntu have been hard at work building a
Subuntu live usb. Simon Peter, also know as probono, has posted
for those interested in hearing the future of edubuntu and ubuntu in
education, as well as how sugar can play a role there. I believe
Morgan Collet will be presenting Sugar there.
Kind Regards,
David Van Assche
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:51 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
nbsp;FWIW.nbsp; I have had a number of high school teacher and university
instructors ask about using the xo as a language learning appliance.nbsp; The
two reoccurring themes have been:XO as a portable language lab.Ability to
develop a language learning activity which could tailor itself to the
Walter posed a question on how to communicate the benefits of developing
activities for Sugar in his last Sugar digest. One approach is to look at
the philanthropic aspects of OLPC and SL for potential developers.
The primary goal of any non-profit is to accomplish the organization's
mission as
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:06 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Ed McNierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The OLPC XOCamp event being planned for November 17 – 21 is being
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
I have stopped work on the DS and Journal because OLPC is apparently
*Clinic next door to a School* - A health clinic located right next door
Sasha's school has a close partnership with the school. Many students are
scene there so they decided to add a donated computer to their waiting room
just for kids to use Sugar. This computer still has its hard-drive, but its
:
What is the current recommendation for a LiveUSB image?
-walter
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:42 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Clinic next door to a School - A health clinic located right next door
Sasha's school has a close partnership with the school. Many students are
scene
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Caroline Meeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:42 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
*Clinic next door to a School* - A health clinic located right next door
Sasha's school has a close partnership with the school. Many students
It looks like our friends at Ubuntu have been hard at work building a
Subuntu live usb. Simon Peter, also know as probono, has posted information
on downloading and building the usb at
http://dev.laptop.org/~probono/sbuntu/
Thanks to the Ubuntu SugarTeam for packaging Sugar on Ubuntu and to
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Brendan R. Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Greetings,
Hey Brendan,
Welcome to the list!
Our company and developers are interested in getting involved with the
development community for Sugar. We deploy Linux desktop solutions in
schools in the United States
Great Work David!
How long do you think it will take to push modified ejabber .debs through the
Ubuntu packaging process?
thanks
David
On 10/17/2008, 11:10, David Van Assche ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:Hi there,
with the generous help from #sugar devs I managed to get ltsp, sugar and
A good first towards solving this challenge is developing a project level self
awareness of the different types of decisions we make.
1. Pedagogical
2. Technical
3. Political
As a general rule we should strive to make decisions base on their pedagogical
soundness, technical merit, and
This is also a Sugar Labs branding issue. Sugar Learning Platform does a
better job of conveying we are not a stand alone solution. We are a common
point of collaboration on which educators and developers build solutions for
their own unique classrooms and situations.
thanks
david
On Wed, Oct
Does anyone on the list have contacts at Mandriva. I'll start the process
of pushing Sugar through Mandriva. I have very little experience with the
Mandriva community.
thanks
david
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
The regression in pydocweb is fixed. I will go through the list of
docstrings requiring review.
Morgs, thanks for all the work on the network strings!
thanks
david
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 13:55 +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
thanks
david
I've started on sugar.network as I went through that code recently.
Here's an issue with pydocweb:
http://sugarlabs1.xen.prgmr.com/pydocweb/doc/sugar.network.GlibTCPServer/
doesn't show the name of a method starting
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 10:15 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Yes, pydocweb uses merge from GNUs RCS to handle changes between the
docstrings in the pydocweb database and the source code. Whatever merge
can not figure out, is flagged for editor attention.
I will commit it, let me know
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:17 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Another thing... Is it possible to setup things so that one of the
core developers has a quick look to the docs before they go in? (So
that we have a chance to detect mistakes or to just improvements). I
think it would be important
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 17:11 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 4:42 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you suggest?
If I understand your explanations correctly, the system already
support some kind of review workflow... could devs just get involved
I just recieved some link about how pydocweb is being used in
documenting scipy.
Joe Harrington's Project Overview:
http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/SciPy2008/paper_7/
Stefan Van der Walt's Technical Overview:
http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/SciPy2008/paper_5/
You might also be
Looking for a few people to help us hit the 5% mark for API being
written. I hit the 4%[1] this morning:)
I am mostly stubbing out sugar.graphics with parameter lists for
function call. It seems much easier to start from sometime rather a
blank page.
The patches are flowing into the git tree
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 23:35 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:00 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patches are flowing into the git tree correctly. If you find bugs
or anything that looks kludge in the system, please let us know. This
is the first
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 16:24 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Walter Bender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We certainly could do something equivalent to the Austin sprint. All
being in the room together made a big difference for that initial
push.
Yes, I'm not sure
An interesting event for any of our Europe based friends.
SkoleLinux is(can be) a valuable partner to Sugar Labs!
Forwarded Message
From: Lars Risan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Debian-Edu Skolelinux Developer Gathering in Oslo, Norway,
October 10.-12.
It appears that the consensus is to keep activity developers and sugar
developers united on the same ML.
Instead of talking specifically about the activities list, I would like
to talk more generally about community growth.
This discussion is premised on the belief that the future of the Sugar
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 13:14 -0700, Edward Cherlin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op 22 aug 2008, om 02:29 heeft David Farning het volgende geschreven:
Welcome to the Sugar on the BeagleBoard project. It seems that we have
all of the pieces
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 11:15 -0400, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
Mikus, when the appropriate lists are decided on and created, you will
find them at http://lists.sugarlabs.org/
I could find lists.sugarlabs.org now that I knew what I was looking
for (and did not use the sugarlabs.org search
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 13:25 -0400, Brian Jordan wrote:
1. Create [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. We have discussed
this a few time over the last few months. Now that we are getting
distro (other the OLPC) related comments the time seems right
2. Create [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list.
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 19:01 -0500, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote:
Hi
maybe this can be of interest,
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Peripherals/Robots
this is planned with open hardware.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Open_Hardware.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Carlos mauro
For those who have not yet gotten a chance to look at the results of
Morgs activity developers survey. It is available at
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Morgs/Activities_survey/Recommendations .
There is a lot of good stuff in there;)
Steps Sugar Labs Should take to improve the situation: Now
After some discussions with Janet Swisher last week I thought it was
time to take another stab at API documentation for sugar.
Background:
Several months ago I started experimenting with several tools to
generate API documentation from the source code.
After several misguided efforts, I settled
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 19:41 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Mikus Grinbergs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Sugar releases being separate from OLPC releases, is there
an 'Official Platform' on which to validate that everything works?
I'm not sure to fully
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 13:21 -0400, Ivan Krstić wrote:
On Aug 31, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Jani Monoses wrote:
I do not know where ISOs could be hosted though.
SugarLabs can host them.
I am a bit reluctant to host them at Sugar Labs. We are pushing to
brand Sugar as distribution agnostic. So,
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 17:28 -0400, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Ivan Krstić wrote:
On Sep 1, 2008, at 5:23 PM, David Farning wrote:
I am a bit reluctant to host them at Sugar Labs. We are pushing to
brand Sugar as distribution agnostic. So, distributing a Ubuntu based
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 01:46 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:47 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5. Separate OLPC deployment support developers from the Sugar Labs
development develops. In the last cycle it appeared that developers and
managers split
Thanks for your support on the LiveCD and LiveUSB. We now have a script
that builds liveCDs and LiveUSBs.
The script pulls the latest packages from the SugarTeam PPA and addeds
it to the 8.4 liveCD.
Where do you think we should host the build scripts and the isos?
thanks
dfarning
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
some of the Sugar developers will come out from their honeycombs and
fly to Brno, Czech Republic to meet at the FUDCon Brno 2008 the
September 5 - 7, 2008. The plan is to explain to whoever listens to us
in which
Welcome to the Sugar on the BeagleBoard project. It seems that we have
all of the pieces in place to do a port.
First, some background.
The initial port will be getting Sugar[1] to run on the Beagleboard[2]
using the Open Embedded[3] toolkit.
For a collaboration point, Jason has set up the
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 21:29 -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote:
David Farning wrote:
It has been a bit of a plug but it looks like we have reach critical
mass for a self sustaining embedded Sugar community.
I love the idea of getting a critical mass around something, but I don't yet
get
It has been a bit of a plug but it looks like we have reach critical
mass for a self sustaining embedded Sugar community.
The first board will be the beagleboard[1]. We have assembled a core
group of developers who are in doing the port. We will be using the
Open Embedded[2] toolkit.
OE is an
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 16:00 -0500, Jason Kridner wrote:
Call for presentation from Sugar developers,
I think it would be great if the Sugar community would put forth a
training at the Embedded Systems Conference in Boston in October[1].
What sort of class do you have in mind? I will see
Over the last weeks I have been looking at how we can improve our
release cycle. Today will be about defining and implementing goals.
Setting goals for any software project is hard, much less an open source
project.
Marco started the discussion last week at
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 23:08 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Hello,
I started working on the goals for 0.84 in the wiki:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap/0.84#Goals
Here is what I have so far.
* Next generation journal
* File sharing
* Collaboration scalability
*
The third step in establishing a release cycle will be determining
responsibilities. This will be the biggest challenge.
Assessment of areas to improve. This is not meant as a slight on the
hard work any individuals at OLPC have done on Sugar. I am amazed at
the overall progress you have made
Now that Sugar Labs has released .8.2 to OLPC it is time to revisit the
release cycle issue.
I have the feeling that most of us agree _in_principle_ to the idea that
an established release cycle is important.
As part of his Ph.D. Martin Michlmayr has done some interesting research
on the topic.
The first step in establishing a release cycle will be setting the
period.
Here again, I think that we all agree in principle on a sixth month
cycle.
From Sugar Labs perspective the actual time period is quite arbitrary.
The lower bound is how quickly we can effectively iterate through the
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 16:53 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
Hi All,
Can I get a quick +1/-1 on this question related to
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7331
The new Home View in 8.2.0 will have three available styles. We need to
pick one to default on first upgrade or install.
Choices are:
On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 03:17 -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
We'd need to do some serious QA to figure this out, but I think it
would go a long ways towards giving people a sense of what they can
expect in terms of a robust use of Sugar.
-walter
As a related update on
I am forwarding this question from Jonas Smedgaard the Debian package
maintainer to the developer list.
dfarning
Forwarded Message
From: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sugar on Debian
Date
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 02:03 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Hello,
I discussed a bit with Michael how to integrate Sugar and OLPC release
processes. I'm going to summarize the outcoming here.
* SugarLabs should try to schedule his release a few months before the
OLPC release target
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 12:18 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Any reason we don't have a localization team in the wiki? Any
volunteer to set it up?
Translations should really be handled upstream, so it's an area where
SugarLabs have to be very active.
Currently, Sayamindu Dasgupta is
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 12:15 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Hello,
there has been a bit of confusion on how the OLPC and SugarLabs
schedules relates, in particular regarding translation and string
freeze.
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/localization/2008-July/001139.html
I'm
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 20:59 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Chris Leonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would say that Sayamindu is already doing exactly that sort of working
with upstream in the form of trying to coordinate translation efforts into
release
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:37 -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Since a conversation on IRC got unexpectedly heated, let me restate my
personal philosophy for OLPC's relationships with upstream:
(a) I believe that we should put OLPC's goals *first*, and endeavor to
ensure that we are always
I am adapting Jonathan Corbet's 'who wrote the kernel' to work with
sugar. Below are the a raw results for Glucose and Sucrose.
If you are on the commiters list, please send me who you would like to
get credit as your employer.
If you are missing from the list, let me know so I can clean up
As an exercise for coordinating the look and feel of the sugarlabs.org
family of sites, I took a pass at a git Stats page. It is at
http://api.sugarlabs.org/s.s.o/ .
Some of the links in the navigation menu are broken because it doesn't
handle the s.s.o subdirectory correctly.
When
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 10:36 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:29 PM, David Farning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two releases per year make sense. Particularly when add in the fact that
we have two hemispheres with opposing springs and falls.
Only if you assume we can
On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 15:02 -0400, Kim Quirk wrote:
Deepak (and others interested in support),
This is a good question and we've talked about it from time to time.
The OLPC Support planning is really just now underway. We've made some
good progress on the Hardware side of support (spare
On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 04:16 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Hello,
as you probably noticed trac is a mess, no one payed attention to it
for too long.
We have 503 bugs open for Glucose, most of them assigned to me and Tomeu.
I have spent the week cleaning up and moving a.s.o from my sandbox to
api.sugarlabs.org.
It is mostly working, with the exception of the favicon.
Code for the site is at
https://www.develer.com/gitweb/pub?p=users/dfarning/api.git;a=summary .
There is a very rough draft of the API documentation
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:07 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
In general, I like what I see. I think somewhat more (and somewhat
less) specific governance needs to be specified from what I see so far.
Not all of these need to be addressed in a temporary working governance
document, but do need to
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 21:16 +0200, Ivan Krstić wrote:
On Jun 6, 2008, at 9:04 PM, Jim Gettys wrote:
The community itself needs to decide on a set of people who are the
group of sysadmin people for Sugar's possible move to be something all
are comfortable about.
Please don't top post, and
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 16:01 -0400, Faisal Anwar wrote:
Hi Tomeu,
Thanks for your email and willingness to help. I'm prioritizing
getting something similar to the java almanac up and running, but if I
can get a substantial body of how to's completed in the next couple of
weeks, then I will
91 matches
Mail list logo
