On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Alexander Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 16:27 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 15:46 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Larsson wrote:
| On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 15:34 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
| Dear Mr. Larsson,
| My name is Ben Schwartz, and I am a volunteer with OLPC. As you may be
| aware, the OLPC design calls for a centralized versioning
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:29 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
It sounds like in order to use GVFS for a revision-controlled system, one
must either represent versions as paths or mounts. Neither seems ideal to
me, as versions are something else altogether.
Exactly. Its doable, but not
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| sufficiently generic to encompass multiple versions. I do not fully
| grasp the layering between GIO and GVFS.
Be aware that GIO/GVFS are very high level. In other words, they work
for the Gnome guys because
4 matches
Mail list logo
