Re: [sugar] [PATCH] Fixing timestamp issue on wnck.Window.activate()

2008-06-04 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
def present(self): -# wnck.Window.activate() expects a timestamp, but we don't -# always have one, and libwnck will complain if we pass 0, -# and matchbox doesn't look at the timestamp anyway. So we -# just always pass 1. -self._window.activate(1) +

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] Fixing timestamp issue on wnck.Window.activate()

2008-06-04 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: def present(self): -# wnck.Window.activate() expects a timestamp, but we don't -# always have one, and libwnck will complain if we pass 0, -# and matchbox doesn't look at the timestamp

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] Fixing timestamp issue on wnck.Window.activate()

2008-06-04 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: def present(self): -# wnck.Window.activate() expects a timestamp, but we don't -# always have one, and libwnck will

Re: [sugar] [PATCH] Fixing timestamp issue on wnck.Window.activate()

2008-06-04 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: def present(self): -# wnck.Window.activate()