Greg Smith wrote:
I want to read all the e-mails that are important for XO users and I
want to skip anything not directly relevant to them. I'll archive and
maintain links to the rest in case I need to look something up.
Knowing my perspective, let me know if you have any suggestions on how
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
Greg Smith wrote:
Hi Bernie,
I read the lists in digest except for Sur which I get individually
because I was the first admin for that the list (can't seem to turn that
off :-(
I focus 100% on delivering the best experience possible for users of the
400K XOs
Hi Bernie,
I read the lists in digest except for Sur which I get individually
because I was the first admin for that the list (can't seem to turn that
off :-(
I focus 100% on delivering the best experience possible for users of the
400K XOs shipped so far (50K more shipping every month). So I
Hi Morgan,
I prefer it on lists.laptop.org. Mainly because I don't have capacity to
watch lists from two mailman servers.
It also depends somewhat on the purpose. We need to communicate
dependencies, APIs, and other things related to activities on the XO.
Hopefully we can use this list for
Thanks Martin and Albert for your dissenting opinions. They are valuable.
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 13:36, Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Morgan Collett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am happy to take on making this communication happen but I really
think
Morgan Collett wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 15:23, Morgan Collett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've raised the idea a couple of times to have a mailing list
specifically for activity developers, which would be uncluttered by
all the traffic on the devel and even sugar lists. That would
Greg Smith wrote:
I prefer it on lists.laptop.org. Mainly because I don't have capacity to
watch lists from two mailman servers.
What do you mean by this? Do you read the archives rather than
subscribing to the lists?
It also depends somewhat on the purpose. We need to communicate
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Morgan Collett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my experience the activity developer community has lost many
participants already. Perhaps they weren't going to stay anyway,
beyond an initial
...
I personally found the best approach was to follow all communication
Another simplement argument: this will be clearer for users to know
where to send feedback. If you have a question about a particular
activity, ask on the activity list. For other questions ask on the
Sugar list.
--
Bastien
___
Sugar mailing list
2008/8/3 Martin Dengler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 05:10:54PM -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastien wrote:
| - announce new activities
| - announce changes in ownership
| - check for dead/agonizing/orphaned
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Morgan Collett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am happy to take on making this communication happen but I really
think we need this list.
FWIW, Sugar + activities are still somewhat tightly coupled, as Sugar
and the underlying OS API are changing. As long as that is
Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW, Sugar + activities are still somewhat tightly coupled, as Sugar
and the underlying OS API are changing. As long as that is true, to
maintain an activity to a good standard, you have to keep an eye on
devel@ and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My rule of
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 10:43:30AM -0500, Bastien wrote:
Martin Langhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW, Sugar + activities are still somewhat tightly coupled, as Sugar
and the underlying OS API are changing. As long as that is true, to
maintain an activity to a good standard, you have to
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:47, Morgan Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:42, Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any follow-up on the idea of having a precise list of maintainers for
all Sugar activities? Even just the email address from the git repo
would be nice.
My only question is whether this should be @lists.laptop.org or
@lists.sugarlabs.org. Please comment, or I will make it the latter by
default.
I think the latter makes sense, activities are meant to work with Sugar
and not the XO in particular.
Shikhar
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:42, Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any follow-up on the idea of having a precise list of maintainers for
all Sugar activities? Even just the email address from the git repo
would be nice.
I've raised the idea a couple of times to have a mailing list
specifically
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:47:56AM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 04:42, Bastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any follow-up on the idea of having a precise list of maintainers for
all Sugar activities? Even just the email address from the git repo
would be nice.
[...]
17 matches
Mail list logo
