On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also like to stop calling this 9.1 planning. We need to plan
Sounds like it is time for a naming contest for this [repeating]
event. Some that have been suggested / implied:
OLPCSW [08.11.1]
OLPC Miniconference
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also like to stop calling this 9.1 planning. We need to plan the
development work we need to get done, regardless of whether that work will
be able to ship next March. At a certain point we will have some of this
Does it make sense to have an afternoon or a full day about long-term
plans and their implications for immediate priorities and tests?
Try to capture topics that could be specific agenda items with their
own session or conversation -- by creating a separate thread about it
on the list, a separate
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 06:15:31PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Ed McNierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also like to stop calling this 9.1 planning. We need to plan the
development work we need to get done, regardless of whether that work will
be
Tomeu:
Scott:
I think more like:
Nov 17-20: talks and hacking
Nov 21: priorities meeting, wrapup.
I'm not the planning committee, but this would be what I'd like to see.
Works for me. Should we be concerned that talk (or aguing) might
expand so much that there's little time to take
Folks -
I would like to spend some time this week getting a bit more consensus on
the goals and agenda for this conversation before we get too far ahead with
planning and invitations. I don't want to spend the first day setting the
scope and expectations for the week only to discover that some
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:33 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to clarify: like our mini-conferences in the past, the plan is
to have at least three days full of talks and hacking, so that we all
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Ed McNierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It currently looks like the week of November 17 - 21 is our target for our
planning meeting, so as to avoid travel during the (following) US
Thanksgiving holiday week. I concur with Scott's suggestion of having a
sugarlabs
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:12 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Ed McNierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It currently looks like the week of November 17 - 21 is our target for our
planning meeting, so as to avoid travel during the (following) US
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to clarify: like our mini-conferences in the past, the plan is
to have at least three days full of talks and hacking, so that we all
Are you proposing something like:
17 - 21 Talks and hacking
24 - 25
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:33 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to clarify: like our mini-conferences in the past, the plan is
to have at least three days full of talks and hacking, so that we all
I'm not sure who the planning committee is, but this is the sort of
schedule I was thinking about, too.
- Ed
On Oct 10, 2008, at 3:33 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to clarify: like our
OLPC needs to work out its priorities and goals for 9.1. Sugarlabs
needs to do the same for 0.84. We should do it together!
I suggest that sugarlabs organize an 0.84 planning meeting, to be held
at the same time/place as OLPC's 9.1 planning meeting in November. My
understanding is that SJ is
13 matches
Mail list logo
