On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not a fan of lots of little / characters everywhere (fine if a user want
> to type them in the unified text search area to look somewhere specific),
> but you could show entries that came (or are) outside of the local
On 16 Oct 2008, at 01:51, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Proposal (off the cuff, please poke holes in this): We might beef
up
| the HIG in the area of tagging, and even suggest a set of canonical
| tags for various ty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
| Heh, Ben doesn't like path tags, it looks like. ;-)
No, I don't. (I do like Scott, and I do like Scott's demo in general and
in other regards.)
| Someone mentioned that facebook adds magic image
| tags based on *recognizing
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Proposal (off the cuff, please poke holes in this): We might beef up
> | the HIG in the area of tagging, and even suggest a set of canonical
> | tags for various types of content. (Localized, of course.) Combining
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eben Eliason wrote:
| Proposal (off the cuff, please poke holes in this): We might beef up
| the HIG in the area of tagging, and even suggest a set of canonical
| tags for various types of content. (Localized, of course.) Combining
| this with Scott's
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:03 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a few random observations that i had today, prompted by scott's
> talk/demo:
>
>- while people don't tend to name their jpegs (today), they
>do tend to group them into folders (e.g. "vacation_pix").
>the equivalent o
a few random observations that i had today, prompted by scott's
talk/demo:
- while people don't tend to name their jpegs (today), they
do tend to group them into folders (e.g. "vacation_pix").
the equivalent of this in a tagged world would be bulk
tagging. i assume sco
One extra thing that epiphany has that you didn't explicitelly showed
in your mockup is, as you select/type tags, the "most popular and/or
recent" section of the tag pane gets "related tags" thrown into its
mix. Related tags are those which have been applied to objects along
side the typed one(s).
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am a little unsure what the Actions, Objects and Labels tabs do however.
>
> They are alternate views, or ways of organizing, the data. The
> action/object split is elaborated upon in the posted Journal designs.
> (http:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Bobby Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm paying attention to this thread, quietly. I like a lot of this.
>> :) I'll let it continue without interfering, for now, but I wanted to
>> po
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm paying attention to this thread, quietly. I like a lot of this.
> :) I'll let it continue without interfering, for now, but I wanted to
> point out that the new toolbar design (posted on the wiki) would make
> that "mo
I'm paying attention to this thread, quietly. I like a lot of this.
:) I'll let it continue without interfering, for now, but I wanted to
point out that the new toolbar design (posted on the wiki) would make
that "more actions" option much nicer. For that matter, as Eduardo
mentions, they don't
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Eduardo H. Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also imagine that the Extra options menu would appear in the main
> toolbar in the Detailed view. And aditionally, like in one of eben's
> mockup, once a entry is checked in this list view, either the main
> toolbar ch
I also imagine that the Extra options menu would appear in the main
toolbar in the Detailed view. And aditionally, like in one of eben's
mockup, once a entry is checked in this list view, either the main
toolbar changes to provide contextual actions (those you placed in
that menu, copy, apply label
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:05 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> c. scott ananian wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Eduardo H. Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Ah, so that's why you separate these legacy-hierarchical files with a
> > > light grey slash (/) . So that a kid who on
c. scott ananian wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Eduardo H. Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ah, so that's why you separate these legacy-hierarchical files with a
> > light grey slash (/) . So that a kid who only knows the Journal
> > tagging world can ignore it, and users who hav
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Eduardo H. Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, so that's why you separate these legacy-hierarchical files with a
> light grey slash (/) . So that a kid who only knows the Journal
> tagging world can ignore it, and users who have know the hierarchical
> world can
Ah, so that's why you separate these legacy-hierarchical files with a
light grey slash (/) . So that a kid who only knows the Journal
tagging world can ignore it, and users who have know the hierarchical
world can understand it and make advance usage of that knowledge when
transfering from or brows
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Eduardo H. Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott, I thought you came to the conclusion that there was no use for
> ordered tags. What changed your mind? Was it the abilty to browse
> hierarchical systems with the Journal? I also thought you came to the
> conclusi
Scott, I thought you came to the conclusion that there was no use for
ordered tags. What changed your mind? Was it the abilty to browse
hierarchical systems with the Journal? I also thought you came to the
conclusion that turning directory names as tags alone worked. How
would the results be differ
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Briefly: in addition to specifying multiple tags as "a b c" you can
> | also separate some of the tags with slashes, like "a/b c". A search
> | for "a/b" only turns up entries tagged "a/b" not entries tagged "b/a"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
| On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> C. Scott Ananian wrote:
|> | A hand-drawn proposal for what a Journal supporting "dir
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> | A hand-drawn proposal for what a Journal supporting "directory
> | traversal" as well as tag space exploration is in the attached PDF.
>
On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:05 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> A hand-drawn proposal for what a Journal supporting "directory
> traversal" as well as tag space exploration is in the attached PDF.
> Discussion welcome!
FWIW, I made several impassioned proposals for these features -- in
fact, with some vi
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 02:05:55PM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> A hand-drawn proposal for what a Journal supporting "directory
> traversal" as well as tag space exploration is in the attached PDF.
> Discussion welcome!
>
I am unable to view this PDF. It appears blank on this end. Would you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
| A hand-drawn proposal for what a Journal supporting "directory
| traversal" as well as tag space exploration is in the attached PDF.
| Discussion welcome!
Could you please point me to a description of the semantics for these
26 matches
Mail list logo
