Re: [sugar] i18n & L10n anomalies

2007-10-30 Thread Xavier Alvarez
Ben, What we are trying to ensure is that the latest POT in d.l.o is actually the true POT. The request is because there are a series of translated POs that don't have *more* strings that the existing POT -- so sync'ing them will mean removing translated messages. In other words, we are tryin

Re: [sugar] i18n & L10n anomalies

2007-10-30 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
Hi, On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 11:28 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Xavier Alvarez wrote: > > Summary: L10n needs developers to push latest POT in d.l.o > > As an activity developer, I am confused as to precisely what you want. My > latest .

Re: [sugar] i18n & L10n anomalies

2007-10-30 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Xavier Alvarez wrote: > Summary: L10n needs developers to push latest POT in d.l.o As an activity developer, I am confused as to precisely what you want. My latest .pot file is in git on dev.laptop.org. Is that where you want it? - --Ben -BEGIN

[sugar] i18n & L10n anomalies

2007-10-29 Thread Xavier Alvarez
People, Summary: L10n needs developers to push latest POT in d.l.o In our drive to get the L10n (Pootle) server running, we are faced with the situation where enough POs are out-of-line with their corresponding POT (as highlighted by Ed Trager). Below is a sample list of them (stats were