On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the questions are: is this a feature we should deliver for the 8.2
release?
In my opinion, no.
Do you think differently?
Personally I
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Guillaume Desmottes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le lundi 09 juin 2008 à 16:12 -0400, Michael Stone a écrit :
Tomeu,
have heard occasional requests to implement the sending and sharing of
journal entries.
It's a desirable feature but, from my perspective, it's
Tomeu,
have heard occasional requests to implement the sending and sharing of
journal entries.
It's a desirable feature but, from my perspective, it's much lower in
immediate priority than work which brings the sugar UI revision into a
releasable condition and which polish the existing work by
I would argue otherwise. Since Sugar has no control over the
robustness of the network, having some way of sharing at a basic level
from the Journal is seemingly a high priority. Half of the
high-priority bugs in the link you provide are in fact not really
Sugar bugs, but subsystem bugs. The
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:18:10PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
I would argue otherwise. Since Sugar has no control over the
robustness of the network, having some way of sharing at a basic level
from the Journal is seemingly a high priority.
My feeling is that since Sugar has no control over
An OLPC intern would have actually taken up this task, but changed
direction for the summer. I 'm not sure though how network robustness
will improve if some networking (such as file transfer) is done in the
Journal. A slightly more radical change may be necessary ;-)
p.
Walter Bender wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the questions are: is this a feature we should deliver for the 8.2
release?
In my opinion, no.
Do you think differently?
Personally I think we should put it at the very end of the prioritized
list of new features:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Michael Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 04:18:10PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
I would argue otherwise. Since Sugar has no control over the
robustness of the network, having some way of sharing at a basic level
from the Journal is
Hi Kim and Michael,
have heard occasional requests to implement the sending and sharing of
journal entries.
Eben has specified how object transfer would work in the shell:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Specifications/Object_Transfers
And Benjamin Schwartz has implemented an activity that tries to
9 matches
Mail list logo
