Re: [Sugar-devel] Sucrose Downloads not synced (was Re: [RELEASE] Browse-103)

2009-01-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 09:30:17AM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: Simon Schampijer wrote: Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:16:02PM +, Simon Schampijer wrote: == Source ==

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:27:08PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: the Sucrose package of Pippy is version 25 - when I last released it back in August. Since then there has been some development going into Pippy (now version 30)

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Olpc-open] Basic Maths?

2009-01-20 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
Rafael Ortiz -- Forwarded message -- From: Tom Stewart lap...@tastewar.com Date: Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:42 AM Subject: [Olpc-open] Basic Maths? To: olpc-open olpc-o...@lists.laptop.org There is a Basic Math Game activity listed on the Math portal page

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Nirav Patel
PyBox2D is included locally in the activity, just as it is in Physics, x2o, Bridge, and other Activities that use physics. Though, that is ~2.5mB of duplicated libraries for each. Nirav On 1/20/09, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue,

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:48:57PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Morgan Collett wrote: On Ubuntu we're not supporting jhbuild on hardy any more, due to newer dependencies that are only in Intrepid. Thanks for the info. Would be nice if there were a list

Re: [Sugar-devel] Extensive jhbuild refactoring landed

2009-01-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:38 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: slo-buildbot is removed. It will take a couple for the change to propagate through the buildbot network Can you also remove sugar-buildbot from git.sl.org? I'll make it deprecated, would like to keep the sources

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:10:11PM -0500, Nirav Patel wrote: PyBox2D is included locally in the activity, just as it is in Physics, x2o, Bridge, and other Activities that use physics. Though, that is ~2.5mB of duplicated libraries for each.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Luke Faraone
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:10:11PM -0500, Nirav Patel wrote: PyBox2D is included locally in the activity, just as it is in Physics, x2o, Bridge, and other Activities that use

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Nirav Patel
I prefer to look at it pragmatically. Until there is some kind of dependency handling for .xo packages, this is the difference between a child at an existing deployment being able to browse to the wiki, download an activity, and use it, or not being able to. Nirav On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:03

[Sugar-devel] Summary and minutes from Pia's first Deployment Meeting.

2009-01-20 Thread Michael Stone
: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Deployment_meetings/20090120#Summary http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Deployment_meetings/20090120 Enjoy, and please consider joining us later today/tomorrow at 0800 UTC (0300 in Boston) in #olpc-deployment on irc.freenode.net to discuss the questions and comments

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: sugar-jhbuild

2009-01-20 Thread Walter Bender
Forwarding to list -walter -- Forwarded message -- From: fors...@ozonline.com.au Date: Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM Subject: sugar-jhbuild To: walter.ben...@gmail.com Cc: pau...@gmail.com, rgesthui...@gmail.com, costello.ro...@edumail.vic.gov.au, billk...@gmail.com,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Luke Faraone
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Nirav Patel o...@spongezone.net wrote: I prefer to look at it pragmatically. Until there is some kind of dependency handling for .xo packages, this is the difference between a child at an existing deployment being able to browse to the wiki, download an

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Wade Brainerd
It's important to separate the pragmatism from the license concern. I fully support the pragmatism of shipping libraries with activities as a temporary solution, if that's what is needed to make the activity work. If the license *requires* us to include the source code to the compiled module (is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, I prefer to look at it pragmatically. Until there is some kind of dependency handling for .xo packages, this is the difference between a child at an existing deployment being able to browse to the wiki, download an activity, and use it, or not being able to. It's also the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Pippy not ready for Sucrose

2009-01-20 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 06:24:48PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote: Hi, I prefer to look at it pragmatically. Until there is some kind of dependency handling for .xo packages, this is the difference between a child at an existing deployment

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: sugar-jhbuild

2009-01-20 Thread David Farning
Tony, As far as running Jhbuild, I would look at http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Jhbuild It is quite a bit more up to date then the resources you are looking at. Have you seen the work that the Sugar on a Stick people are doing at http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick ? It is

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Gary C Martin wrote: On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: Issues: We do not have a don't save those changes option. If you

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #3: resume by default

2009-01-20 Thread Gary C Martin
On 21 Jan 2009, at 00:18, Simon Schampijer wrote: Gary C Martin wrote: On 17 Jan 2009, at 15:30, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 15:54, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:45:54PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote: Issues: We do not

Re: [Sugar-devel] Extensive jhbuild refactoring landed

2009-01-20 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 21.01.2009, at 02:31, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: Hello, I landed David work on jhbuild. Please do a clean build and report any issue you run into. David, I guess we should remove the slo-buildbot repository to avoid confusion and switch the buildbot to use sugar-jhbuild. David

[Sugar-devel] sugar-jhbuild in Gitorious

2009-01-20 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Ciao, I finally tracked down and fixed the reason why the sugar-jhbuild project was causing Gitorious to die with a 500 Internal Server Error. There were 2 records in table committerships referring to user_id=53, which did not exist. This would make the template engine blow up with an exception

[Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Hello, I spent some time trying to get Sugar on a stick images (which are basically livecd-tools based Fedora spins) running on the XO from nand. Converting the image to jffs2 and adding cafe_nand and jffs2 to the initrd was enough to make it boot. I have two weird problems: 1 haldaemon fails

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: sugar-jhbuild

2009-01-20 Thread Bill Kerr
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:43 AM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.orgwrote: Tony, As far as running Jhbuild, I would look at http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Jhbuild It is quite a bit more up to date then the resources you are looking at. Have you seen the work that the Sugar on a