On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:11, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Ton van Overbeek wrote:
When trying out Soas-200902231225 the journal stays empty.
Anybody else seen this ?
Also in http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ there is now a
Soas-200902241809.iso.
What is this ?
Hi,
The Sugar Labs BugSquad [2] meets this week for another Triage session.
When: Thursday 26 February, 2009 - 16.00 (UTC)
Where: irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting
Who: You do not need any programming knowledge to be in the BugSquad; in
fact it is a great way to return something to the Sugar
Sorry the header was wrong.
Simon
Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
The Sugar Labs BugSquad [2] meets this week for another Triage session.
When: Thursday 26 February, 2009 - 16.00 (UTC)
Where: irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting
Who: You do not need any programming knowledge to be in the
Ton van Overbeek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Ton van Overbeek wrote:
When trying out Soas-200902231225 the journal stays empty.
Anybody else seen this ?
Also in http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ there is now a
Hi Hamilton,
Chua wrote:
Hello Everyone,
My name is Hamilton Chua and I am new to these lists and even newer to sugar
development and the olpc in general so please do forgive me if the questions
I am about to ask have been asked and answered before.
I am using a development snapshot of
Done!
Christian
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 1:17 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.orgwrote:
Christian,
Will you post the new meeting information on
http://sugarlabs.org/go/DesignTeam/Meetings ?
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Christian Marc Schmidt
christianm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Dear Sugar Community,
this is Release Candidate 2 for the upcoming 0.84 Release - see the [1]
for more details. Only one more week to go in this release cycle. Please
test this release and report all the bugs you find that we are able to
fix them
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
da...@lang.hm wrote:
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Dear Sugar Community,
this is Release Candidate 2 for the upcoming 0.84 Release - see the [1]
for more details. Only one more week to go in this release cycle. Please
test this
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Carol Farlow Lerche wrote:
. the purpose (not in security speak but in terms of the benefits it brings
to end users),
also why should rainbow be used instead of one of the many other sets of
tools available to distros for locking down a desktop (SELinux, or other
LSMs)?
Hello Everyone,
My name is Hamilton Chua and I am new to these lists and even newer to sugar
development and the olpc in general so please do forgive me if the questions
I am about to ask have been asked and answered before.
I am using a development snapshot of Sugar on a Stick (SoaS) and XS
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
I would however want to do so for Debian. I'll test myself that bundle_id
works with 0.82,
That does not break anything. The underlying hulahop has changed and Browse
reacted to that - that is why we can not provide
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Ton van Overbeek wrote:
When trying out Soas-200902231225 the journal stays empty.
Anybody else seen this ?
Also in http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ there is now a
Soas-200902241809.iso.
What is
Every day, around a dozen emails get held by mailman for inspection by
a human being because they were posted by non-member addresses or
because there are other reasons for considering them suspicious.
Most of these are of course spam, but a few are valid posts. Today I
ran through a long
Hey Josh, thanks for the offer of help!
I definitely like your simple and kid-friendly theme for addons. I wonder
off the top of my head though, if it makes sense to make addons.sl.o look
*more* like the other sl.o sites?Things are kind of confusing right now
with the different styles of wiki,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 04:20:00PM +0100, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Every day, around a dozen emails get held by mailman for inspection by
a human being because they were posted by non-member addresses or
because there are other reasons for
Hola,
Nos acercamos al final de la propuesta para Merani, por favor revísenla y
corrijanla.
Lean la sección de notas para nosotros ;).
Rafael Ortiz
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Ignore this
Sorry..
Rafael Ortiz
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
dir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hola,
Nos acercamos al final de la propuesta para Merani, por favor revísenla y
corrijanla.
Lean la sección de notas para nosotros ;).
Rafael Ortiz
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Martin, are there any plans yet on how to make the services of a school
server available to non XO hardware?
I'm certainly keen on supporting it. We'd need a uid scheme - what
would be the best approach for this?
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
The I can volunteer for that. I already do same task for 10-15 other
lists that I am admin for.
Thank you very much, Jonas.
I'm sending you the moderator password by private email. Let me know
if there's anything else you'd like to change in the configuration of
the
19 matches
Mail list logo
