Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Browse-100 (8.2.1 only)

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Martin Langhoff wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: this is Browse for Sucrose 0.82 or OLPC 8.2.1. XO-bundle: http://shell.sugarlabs.org/~erikos/bundles/Browse-100.xo Fantastic - I had missed the announcement last week. Does this get

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.84.0

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Bobby Powers wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.84.0.tar.bz2 == News == Catch all exceptions while saving #224 Listen for map in Window instead

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose-0.84 Branching

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Wade Brainerd wrote: To save effort for smaller modules, would it make sense to create the branch the first time a 0.84 patch is made? Best, Wade 1. This call only applies to Sucrose modules. Regarding activities those are the Fructose ones and I would say the Honey ones as well. Of course

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Bobby Powers
I am happy to annouce the release of Surf version 106. Surf is basically Browse with the Mozilla/XULRunner guts ripped out, and replaced with the WebKit renderer. Obligitory screenshot: http://dev.laptop.org/~bobbyp/surf/surf_1.png Feeling adventurous? well you can test it out yourself on a

[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84.0 Final Release

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Dear Sugar Community, this is the Final Release in our 0.84 development cycle [1]! Thanks to our testers the developers were able to bring in bug fixes to stabilize the platform. And the translators were busy to get all the strings translated. All the details what have changed from a user

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi Josh, I'm wondering how we can move forward on this. I see two possibilities: - keep insisting to the Design team to give feedback on your mockups and reach an agreement with them after a number if iterations. - implement your design in activities-devel.sugarlabs.org and ask the community

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
It's working now, right? Regards, Tomeu On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 22:07, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Brian, James Simmons had a similar problem with one of his activities last week.  Will look into it as soon as I can. david 2009/3/1 Brian Jordan bcjor...@gmail.com: I was

[Sugar-devel] Easier X app sugarization (was Fwd: Making activities close from the sugar frame)

2009-03-04 Thread Bert Freudenberg
I should have changed the subject earlier - my comment was not about the window closing, but about a generalization of Bibek's patch to simplify sugarization of regular X apps. - Bert - On 04.03.2009, at 11:41, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Btw, at least in Sugar 0.84, this is already fixed. I can

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:21:50AM +, Bobby Powers wrote: I am happy to annouce the release of Surf version 106. Surf is basically Browse with the Mozilla/XULRunner guts ripped out, and replaced with the WebKit renderer. Obligitory screenshot:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose-0.84 Branching

2009-03-04 Thread Walter Bender
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Morgan Collett morgan.coll...@gmail.com wrote: sugar-presence-service, Chat and Read have been branched for sucrose-0.84. TurtleArt and InfoSlicer have been branched for sucrose-0.84 as well. -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Eben Eliason
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi Josh, I'm wondering how we can move forward on this. I see two possibilities: - keep insisting to the Design team to give feedback on your mockups and reach an agreement with them after a number if iterations.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mozilla Add-ons: FlipSticks Nomination

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
Oh, nice - I would rather use RSS feeds than get email. On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 01:09, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: I actually like the idea that the community gets some notice when something new is posted to

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
These charts are really interesting (and nice looking!). The whole thing probably requires a lot of analysis to make real gains though. I wonder what all those calls to 'cat' are in the first chart. I also wonder if it would be possible to defer network initialization until after the GUI comes

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Brian Jordan
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: It's working now, right? Still not working for me -- has anyone been able to upload a .xo bundle in the past three days? If so, a temporary workaround could be having someone else upload the bundle to kickstart the

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread pgf
wade wrote: These charts are really interesting (and nice looking!). The whole thing probably requires a lot of analysis to make real gains though. I wonder what all those calls to 'cat' are in the first chart. I also wonder if it i did some looking, and while i don't think i've found

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 16:59, Brian Jordan bcjor...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: It's working now, right? Still not working for me -- has anyone been able to upload a .xo bundle in the past three days?  If so, a temporary workaround

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 17:04, James Simmons jim.simm...@walgreens.com wrote: Tomeu, I just tried adding ViewSlides-4.xo to ViewSlides and it reports a successful add but when you look at the actual entry for View Slides there are no files to download.  This is what happened to me before.  

[Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs BugSquad meeting REMINDER (04 March, 2009 - 14.00 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

2009-03-04 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hey, let's meet for another round of Bug triaging. 0.84 was just released - a great moment to clear the bug database a bit. It would be good to have the latest Soas (I will announce a new one today) prepared to verify bugs. Regards, Simon PS: Watch out the new time. First we triage bugs

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 17:34, Brian Jordan bcjor...@gmail.com wrote: Tomeu, On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 16:59, Brian Jordan bcjor...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Moon-9, almost (Re: addons.sugarlabs.org is starting to work)

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 17:04, James Simmons jim.simm...@walgreens.com wrote: Tomeu, I just tried adding ViewSlides-4.xo to ViewSlides and it reports a successful add but when you look at the actual entry for View Slides there are no files to download.  This is what happened to me before.  

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:27:00AM -0500, Bobby Powers wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:21:50AM +, Bobby Powers wrote: An informal test showed that Browse in sugar-emulator

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
Looks nice and clean! My only comment is that Download does not look enough like a button. It looks more like a continuation of the header. The position and size of the button in addition to the lack of additional styling both contribute. Best, -Wade On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Eben

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Eben Eliason
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:01 PM, ,Josh williams joshcwilli...@gmail.com wrote: Eben Eliason wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi Josh, I'm wondering how we can move forward on this. I see two possibilities: - keep insisting to the Design team

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread Eben Eliason
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Christian Marc Schmidt christianm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Eben, these look great--very promising, and a nice way to envision extending the visual language of the static web site to other Sugar Labs microsites. I'll take a closer look at the layout and typographic

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Design for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

2009-03-04 Thread ,Josh williams
Eben Eliason wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi Josh, I'm wondering how we can move forward on this. I see two possibilities: - keep insisting to the Design team to give feedback on your mockups and reach an agreement with them after a

[Sugar-devel] The Road to SoaS-2: A new Snapshot!

2009-03-04 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Hi folks, a new soas-2 snapshot is ready for you! Go and grab it NOW from here: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/Soas-200903041854.iso It's important for us to get as much feedback as possible now, since with the recent release of Sugar 0.84, we're also approaching a release of

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Bobby Powers
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:27:00AM -0500, Bobby Powers wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:21:50AM +,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 21:06, Bobby Powers bobbypow...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:27:00AM -0500, Bobby Powers wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Jonas

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 03:06:26PM -0500, Bobby Powers wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: [1] Pages like http://dotnetperls.com/Content/Browser-Memory.aspx demonstrate how WebKit-based browsers in the past

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:17:19PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 21:06, Bobby Powers bobbypow...@gmail.com wrote: I think there are configuration options somewhere, as I seem to remember that Chrome on Andriod (based on webkit)

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Surf 106

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:17:19PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 21:06, Bobby Powers bobbypow...@gmail.com wrote: I think there are configuration options

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Labs BugSquad meeting REMINDER (04 March, 2009 - 14.00 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

2009-03-04 Thread Frederick Grose
Meeting: Bug Triage, 04 March 2009, 09:00-11:00 EST (14:00-16:00 UTC), at irc.freenode.net #sugar-meeting Meeting: Sugar Developers, 04 March 2009, 11:00-13:00 EST (16:00-18:00 UTC), at irc.freenode.net #sugar-meeting (for Gmail users add to Calendar Smart links) Note: Beware of time zones,

[Sugar-devel] (no subject)

2009-03-04 Thread pgf
[resend from subscribed address] last week i announced a daemon that would activate the grab keys on the XO keyboard. a day or two later there was a thread about how it would be nice if the action of the touchpad rotated with the screen (in much the same way that the dpad keys do). since my

[Sugar-devel] testers wanted: grab keys, and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread Paul Fox
last week i announced a daemon that would activate the grab keys on the XO keyboard. a day or two later there was a thread about how it would be nice if the action of the touchpad rotated with the screen (in much the same way that the dpad keys do). since my daemon was already looking at every

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers wanted: grab keys, and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 04.03.2009, at 22:25, Paul Fox wrote: last week i announced a daemon that would activate the grab keys on the XO keyboard. a day or two later there was a thread about how it would be nice if the action of the touchpad rotated with the screen (in much the same way that the dpad keys do).

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers wanted: grab keys, and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 04.03.2009, at 23:24, Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 04.03.2009, at 22:25, Paul Fox wrote: last week i announced a daemon that would activate the grab keys on the XO keyboard. a day or two later there was a thread about how it would be nice if the action of the touchpad rotated with the

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers wanted: grab keys, and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 04.03.2009, at 23:49, p...@laptop.org wrote: bert wrote: Just tried it on my XO at build 800 - works like a charm, both the scrolling and rotation. Yay! great! The only nit I have to pick is the inverted direction of scrolling. With both a scroll-wheel and my MacBook's two-finger

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers needed: grab keys and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread Wade Brainerd
Cool! I'm looking forward to trying this when I get back to my XO I wonder though, is there a reason this has to be a separate daemon, and can't just being part of the HPGK driver with a /sys/... interface for control? Best, Wade On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:45 PM, p...@laptop.org wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread Bobby Powers
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:04 AM, p...@laptop.org wrote: wade wrote:   These charts are really interesting (and nice looking!).  The whole thing   probably requires a lot of analysis to make real gains though.  I wonder   what all those calls to 'cat' are in the first chart.  I also wonder if

Re: [Sugar-devel] The Road to SoaS-2: A new Snapshot!

2009-03-04 Thread Ton van Overbeek
Generated the usb stick on Windows using liveusb-creator 3.2 with the '-x' option to get the boot/olpc.fth file. Edited the olpc.fth file to get rid of the extraneous backslashes (Luke already fixed this in git, but no updated windows version of liveusb-creator has been created yet). First tried

Re: [Sugar-devel] The Road to SoaS-2: A new Snapshot!

2009-03-04 Thread Caroline Meeks
Boots for me! The first two activities I tried worked. Can't connect to the wireless network but I think that might be a problem wiht my wireless. Not ready to call it a Sugar bug yet. On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.comwrote: Hi folks, a new soas-2 snapshot

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:11 PM, p...@laptop.org wrote: now that it's been pointed out that most of the cat processes were from bootchart itself, i highly doubt there will be Heisenbug :-) even then, it does give you fairly good idea of what's up during boot. SoaS is meant to run on any hw out

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-04 Thread pgf
martin wrote: In fact, this might be something that upstream wants to think about in a generic sense. All the boot-in-5s focus lately is a lot of fun (and great for end-users, I surely want _my_ boxes to boot in 5s), but depends in part on skipping a lot of poking and waiting for hardware.

Re: [Sugar-devel] testers needed: grab keys and touchpad rotation

2009-03-04 Thread pgf
wade wrote: Cool! I'm looking forward to trying this when I get back to my XO I wonder though, is there a reason this has to be a separate daemon, and can't just being part of the HPGK driver with a /sys/... interface for control? it's a daemon very largely because much of the code

[Sugar-devel] aslo caching

2009-03-04 Thread David Farning
Are there any php experts around? I changed some .po files in activites.sl.o and then rebuilt the .mo files. After flushing memcache the changes were visible. Now for some reason, the changes seem to have reverted. Is it possible that the old information is being cached somehow? david