Re: [Sugar-devel] versus, not

2009-05-05 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Fair enough. I agree that *most* people on the list agree that there is not just one right way. And to use a metaphor that has been oft-spoken in the US news of late, Sugar Labs has to have a big tent. Sugar itself

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar on Fedora?

2009-05-05 Thread Martin Dengler
[cc'ing sugar-devel] On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 03:12:59PM +0500, Ashar Iqbal wrote: On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com wrote: On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:06:07AM +0500, Ashar Iqbal wrote: The PCs I have are not able to boot off USBs. I need to install

Re: [Sugar-devel] Why setup.py?

2009-05-05 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 28.04.2009, at 19:42, Bert Freudenberg wrote: On 28.04.2009, at 17:34, Luke Faraone wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:30, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: That would make sense. In fact, I previously made a mkDist.py script (in the etoys repo) that would call the bundle

Re: [Sugar-devel] Why setup.py?

2009-05-05 Thread Samuel Klein
setup.py has always bugged me for the reasons stated. SJ On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: On 28.04.2009, at 17:34, Luke Faraone wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:30, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote: That would make sense. In fact, I

[Sugar-devel] Sugar version of Number Race?

2009-05-05 Thread Bastien
I have just listened to a talk by Stanislas Dehaene this morning. He mentioned Number Race - a software based on recent research in cognitive science: http://www.unicog.org/main/pages.php?page=NumberRace I don't know how hard it would be to have a Sugar version, but I think it would be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar version of Number Race?

2009-05-05 Thread Walter Bender
We should perhaps reexamine the JClic stuff as well, in light of Sugar on non-XO hardware. http://clic.xtec.cat/ -walter On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 14:33, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote: I have just listened to a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Digest 2009-05-03

2009-05-05 Thread Bastien
Hi all, following David Farning's advice, we want to keep the SugarCamp as informal as possible. Yet we want to have some tangible output, on top of the obvious (and noble) task of building the Sugar community. So we have been brainstorming a bit and here are 17 challenges that we may want to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2009-05-03

2009-05-05 Thread Martin Dengler
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:45:29AM +0200, Bastien wrote: - Update several XOs from another XO You mean http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Multicast_NAND_FLASH_Update#NANDblasting_an_Unsigned_NAND_Image_File ? - Run Sugar on a Nokia N800 N810 ok?

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2009-05-03

2009-05-05 Thread Bastien
Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com writes: On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:45:29AM +0200, Bastien wrote: - Update several XOs from another XO You mean http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Multicast_NAND_FLASH_Update#NANDblasting_an_Unsigned_NAND_Image_File ? Well, yes, maybe (Samy?) Which reminds

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Digest 2009-05-03

2009-05-05 Thread David Farning
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi all, following David Farning's advice, we want to keep the SugarCamp as informal as possible.  Yet we want to have some tangible output, on top of the obvious (and noble) task of building the Sugar community. So