El Fri, 18-09-2009 a las 16:27 -0400, Chris Ball escribió:
Please volunteer by replying to this mail if you're interested, and
please do so by Thursday September 24th so that we can run the vote
at the Friday September 25th SLOBs meeting.
I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer
2009/9/20 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org:
I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer panel, but I'd
like to offer my viewpoint on this issue.
I agree and I also feel that we have consensus on those 2 things (SL
should promote SoaS, SL should treat distributors equally).
The
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:47, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
2009/9/20 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org:
I can't volunteer to serve as a member of the volunteer panel, but I'd
like to offer my viewpoint on this issue.
I agree and I also feel that we have consensus on those 2 things
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 03:24:23AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:49:00PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
2. manually sync /debian from git.debian.org to git.gnewsense.org
3. do final work in git.gnewsense.org
Is Alioth such a cruel place to work together? Is it me -
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:18:17AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc.
+1
Though you neglected to mention Debian Sugar on
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide to call and market as Sugar on a Stick a particular
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide to call and market as Sugar on a Stick a particular
release of a particular
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide to call and market as Sugar on a
But the idea is for SLs to market only Sugar on a Stick, whatever it
is based on.
Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
customers.
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
Anonymous
On Sunday 20 September 2009 07:24:42
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
But the idea is for SLs to market only Sugar on a Stick, whatever it
is based on.
Exactly. So what it is based on is (or should be) irrelevant to the
customers.
Right, that's why the longer names such as Debian Sugar on a Stick
would refer to
I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
unanswered questions, present and future?
I sympathize since I'm also a bit confused. This is what
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
unanswered questions, present and future?
I
[forwarding to list]
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 21:34, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
Just in case anyone googles for this, it's a weird behaviour of gtk.
Solution here http://www.daa.com.au/pipermail/pygtk/2009-February/016593.html
2009/9/19 Lucian Branescu
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
Anonymous
On Sunday 20 September 2009 07:34:51 Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
2009/9/20 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
But the idea is for SLs to market only Sugar on a Stick, whatever it
is based on.
Exactly. So
It makes a difference with the current sharing of
activities since various combinations of OS and
Sugar versions don't work on the XO-1.
With a number of XO-1 systems running 767 and 802,
I've been able to share activities 767-767 and
802-802 but no luck 767-802. Some of the issue
may not be
Hi Chris,
On 20 Sep 2009, at 15:29, Chris Marshall wrote:
It makes a difference with the current sharing of
activities since various combinations of OS and
Sugar versions don't work on the XO-1.
With a number of XO-1 systems running 767 and 802,
I've been able to share activities 767-767
El Sun, 20-09-2009 a las 09:33 -0500, Yamandu Ploskonka escribió:
Because of my ignorant ways in interpreting things, which I trust is
also the way of the populace :-), I think the wisest thing is to keep
the SOaS moniker as a basic SLs thing, of course, of course
recognizing Sebastian. I
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4209
Sugar Platform:
from 0.82 to 0.84
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/version/29255
Release notes:
Some minor updates were made based on some user feedback:
- moved the Play and Next buttons further from the
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4026
Sugar Platform:
from 0.82 to 0.86
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/version/29254
Release notes:
New lesson editor: Now you can edit the lesson content inside the activity, and
transfer lessons to and from the
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 03:24:23AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 06:49:00PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
2. manually sync /debian from git.debian.org to git.gnewsense.org
3. do final work in
Philippe Clérié wrote:
I don't quite understand this decision panel stuff.
Is a different decision panel elected every time there is an undecided
issue at hand? Or do we elect one group that remains in place for all
unanswered questions, present and future?
I sympathize since I'm also a
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
.
So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
Sugar on a Stick and each individual team and product Fedora Sugar
on a Stick, OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick, etc. From time to time SLs
would decide
22 matches
Mail list logo
