I just downloaded the blueberry iso and the md5sum I get is:
e0576a9e09d3eb13de46099c8d1ee74d
not
4740da1026ab049b7781bbbdf21a8115
as reported on http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Blueberry.
The downloaded file seems complete at 617,611,264 bytes which is equal to the
589MB
Yesterday, I switched the documentation on the page to the shasum,
which was also included on the download page.
thanks.
-walter
2009/12/13 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
I just downloaded the blueberry iso and the md5sum I get is:
e0576a9e09d3eb13de46099c8d1ee74d
not
Great! I match the shasum. Proceeding with install.
:-D
--
Philippe
--
The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon.
Anonymous
On Sunday 13 December 2009 10:04:48 Walter Bender wrote:
Yesterday, I switched the documentation on the page to the shasum,
which was also included
I put blueberry on a stick. I does not load on my HP Mini. It hangs on the
seventh dot. I wouldn't be surprised if it's again a problem with the
Broadcom wireless.
Tried it on the Thinkpad and it works fine. Except I don't see Turtle Art and
the TamTam apps. I must have missed something...
--
2009/12/13 Philippe Clérié phili...@gcal.net:
I put blueberry on a stick. I does not load on my HP Mini. It hangs on the
seventh dot. I wouldn't be surprised if it's again a problem with the
Broadcom wireless.
If you hit esc, you should see the console output during the boot
process. There are
(cc'ing the Sugar development list)
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 11:56 -0500, MacKenzie Sigalos wrote:
Dear Boston,
Hello Laptop Hello World (formerly One For All) is running a pilot
with the 4th grade students at the Cambridge Friends School. We've
been having some issues with printing, and
Write also allows you to save the documents as rtf which can be
openned by almost any word processor available for Macs.
Cheers
Martin
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
(cc'ing the Sugar development list)
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 11:56 -0500, MacKenzie
Looks good ... though I haven't actually reviewed the patches.
I hope you've thought about what will happen if people report problems
that are part of the underlying software stack ... or even hardware.
Perhaps a way for mass deployments to customise the destination for the
problem report.
--
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:23 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Looks good ... though I haven't actually reviewed the patches.
I hope you've thought about what will happen if people report problems
that are part of the underlying software stack ... or even hardware.
It does bundle a
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:26 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 08:07:45PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:23 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Looks good ... though I haven't actually reviewed the patches.
I hope you've thought
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Steven M. Parrish smparr...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are going to try out OS10 for the XO-1 here are a few things that need
testing.
Here are my test results on a XO-1 B4.
Does it boot consistently into Sugar? Gnome?
Working with Sugar.
A flash on screen
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:26 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 08:07:45PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 7:23 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Looks good ...
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 09:32:50PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote:
Honestly, I really have no idea what kind of data we'll get through
the feature. But any data is better than silence IMO.
Agreed.
Have you considered capturing non-problem experience reports as well?
In OLPC testing at the moment
Hi Justin,
On 13 Dec 2009, at 01:56, Justin Lewis wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Gary.
- Is it possible to create your git repository on http://git.sugarlabs.org/
or is it already somewhere public?
Yep, it is currently on Gitorious
(http://gitorious.org/jlew/xo-file-distro). I can
14 matches
Mail list logo
