Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoc 2010 - Feedback requested

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 22:24, Tim McNamara wrote: > Hi all, > Welcome to another round of GSoC. I welcome your thoughts on a few issues. Thanks a lot for taking this enormous task. The comments below are about GSoC projects in the Sugar core, not about most activities or other Sugar-related proje

Re: [Sugar-devel] Status of 3G backport to 0.84

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 20:59, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > erikos: yes, in that case we should make a backporting > erikos: i know that martin and bernie were working in that sense > Daniel_C: yeah, I read that yesterday > > We had trouble getting the code backported to 0.84 to work until we > fin

Re: [Sugar-devel] Seeking enlightenment...

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 06:31, Michael Stone wrote: > Tomeu, > > In what way is Sugar or the Sugar community materially improved by deferring > Wade's patches in #1447 to sugar-0.90? It missed several freezes and nobody is following the processes for requesting exceptions. If it is so important,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity bundles reformation

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 06:38:31PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:07:29PM -0300, Jorge Saldivar wrote: > > > btw I guess it is not only problem with uploading 35M on every version > > > but for downloading as well for Paraguay users? > > > > Yes, uploading and downloading

[Sugar-devel] Seeking enlightenment...

Tomeu, In what way is Sugar or the Sugar community materially improved by deferring Wade's patches in #1447 to sugar-0.90? Michael [1]: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1447#comment:16 ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http:/

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity bundles reformation

Hi Aleksey, On 9 Mar 2010, at 18:38, Aleksey Lim wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:07:29PM -0300, Jorge Saldivar wrote: >>> btw I guess it is not only problem with uploading 35M on every version >>> but for downloading as well for Paraguay users? >> >> Yes, uploading and downloading of 35M i

[Sugar-devel] GSoc 2010 - Feedback requested

Hi all, Welcome to another round of GSoC. I welcome your thoughts on a few issues. Here are some topic headers for discussion: *Recruitment* *any suggestions on how to recruit?* - mentors - students *How should we as a group deal with* *problems that we could face, any recommended counter-strate

[Sugar-devel] Status of 3G backport to 0.84

erikos: yes, in that case we should make a backporting erikos: i know that martin and bernie were working in that sense Daniel_C: yeah, I read that yesterday We had trouble getting the code backported to 0.84 to work until we finally figured out that GsmPalette.set_status() was overriding a met

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Club de Othello XO-1

Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4286 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.88 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/26828/clubothello-1.xo Release notes: Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ S

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity bundles reformation

> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 03:07:29PM -0300, Jorge Saldivar wrote: > > btw I guess it is not only problem with uploading 35M on every version > > but for downloading as well for Paraguay users? > > Yes, uploading and downloading of 35M is a problem here in paraguay, the > internet conexion is so sl

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Speak-14

Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4038 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.88 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/26826/speak-14.xo Release notes: * Workaround for #1801 * Update vi translation Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Club de Othello XO-1

Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4286 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.88 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/26825/clubothello-1.xo Release notes: Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ S