On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 23:25, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
Some have expressed concern about Browse and its current xulrunner
dependency (http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1850). To make matters even
worse for the future, Mozilla plans to get rid of XPCOM at some point in
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 16:07, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi James,
I am very glad people are exploring alternatives around the Journal.
Not sure what your goals are -- would be interesting to hear.
Comments
- I don't know how pluggable the Journal is, but I'd
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 20:13, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Martin, Rodolfo
Aldo, one of the technicians in Caacupe, reported failure to restore
backups created with Sugar 0.82 after the machine has been upgraded to
Sugar 0.84.
Frankly, I don't understand how the restore
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:20, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
+1
+1 from me as well
Thanks!
Tomeu
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:59:38PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Hi!
I hereby request a hard code freeze exception for SL#1838. [1]
Migrating from a 0.82 data store has been broken
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
a tight feedback bugfix loop) when someone like you is there.
[...]
Yes -- but we gotta remember that it's productive (specially for
Sugar) because you are there.
On 03/16/2010 09:49 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:26:31AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 19:38, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Hi all,
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1831
Revert copy to Journal palette item in journal details view.
Could
On 03/22/2010 11:33 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 13:20, Aleksey Limalsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
+1
+1 from me as well
Thanks!
Tomeu
Looks good to me, too. What I would like to see here is TESTING!. It
would be really nice to have some positive test results where
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:51, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
a tight feedback bugfix loop) when someone like you is there.
[...]
Yes -- but we gotta
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:51, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:03 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Agreed. You can do what you are doing (run a school on newish sw, get
a tight feedback
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4290
Sugar Platform:
0.82 - 0.88
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/26839/jam2jam-1.xo
Release notes:
Sugar Labs Activities
http://activities.sugarlabs.org
___
Hi,
I just released sugar-toolkit 0.84.9
Changes:
* Translation updates
* Removes the use of O_SYNC on logs #1656 (James)
* Changes to a Journal entries metadata are wiped if activity is still
open (#1765) (Simon)
* Do not fail while closing object less activities #1714 (Aleksey)
* Check syntax
Bert,
Thanks, that looks like what I needed.
James Simmons
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
I just had the same problem working on Scratch. I needed to filter out the
USB files when listing Journal entries. I now do that by filtering on the
Dear Sucrose Maintainers,
please provide source tarballs for the Sucrose 0.88.0 stable release [1]
by the end of the 29th of March 2010 and announce them as explained at [2].
This will be our Newstable Release, make sure you wear your good shoes
that day!
Thanks,
Simon
[1]
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Lucian Branescu
lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
Some have expressed concern about Browse and its current xulrunner
dependency (http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1850). To make matters even
worse for the future, Mozilla plans to get rid of XPCOM at some point in
Hi, the development team has had one more meeting, minutes and logs:
* http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.minutes.20100322_1010.html
* http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/sugar-meeting.log.20100322_1010.html
Cheers,
Tomeu
___
Sugar-devel
I found this wiki page so far
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mozilla_2/XPCOM_and_Binary_Embedding
I should have a chat with the Mozilla people anyway, that page may not
be entirely up to date.
From this discussion:
1) Performance tests of recent webkit and xulrunner on XOs and other
hardware SoaS runs
FWIW, at litl we are switching from a xulrunner-based brower to a
chromium-based browser. We are seeing a big performance improvement,
plus it's making it easier for us to implement plugin isolation and
better memory management (unloading pages which are not foregrounded,
etc).
YMMV, and it's
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:42 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@cscott.net wrote:
FWIW, at litl we are switching from a xulrunner-based brower to a
chromium-based browser. We are seeing a big performance improvement,
plus it's making it easier for us to implement plugin isolation and
better memory
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:15:02AM +1100, James Cameron wrote:
Looks good to me, too. What I would like to see here is TESTING!. It
would be really nice to have some positive test results where prople
migrate the DS from 0.82 to 0.88.
How would you migrate the DS from 0.82 to 0.88?
Just run
19 matches
Mail list logo
