Re: [Sugar-devel] Experimental work... updated.

2010-04-28 Thread James Cameron
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:46:05PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: I particularly like that I can test sugar*-0.88 directly on my XO by running something comparable to yum install git-core gcc glibc-devel make vim git clone git://dev.laptop.org/users/mstone/sugar; cd sugar make

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] What application in f13 liveinst (Anaconda) takes the live, compressed, file system and converts it to a normal file system during a HD install?

2010-04-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Thomas C Gilliard satel...@bendbroadband.com wrote: I am curious: What application in the f13 liveinst Anaconda (Install to HD link on the live desktop of gnome) takes the live file system and converts it to a normal file system on HD install after the files

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Remove the keep button from the default activity toolbar

2010-04-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 23:21, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On 23 April 2010 15:02, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: I like the proposal of renaming Keep to Copy and placing it in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Experimental work... updated.

2010-04-28 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:46:05PM

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-28 Thread Raul Gutierrez Segales
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 09:56 +1000, James Cameron wrote: On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:43:21AM -0400, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: Looking at it with more detail, the problem is that self._update_signal_match is initialized in the wrong order (after a call to set_object_id that depends on it).

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.90 and migration from GConf to GSettings?

2010-04-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:53, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Is there yet any plans for migrations from GConf to GSettings in the 0.90 development of Sugar? I'm not sure if there's even any requirements but I've noticed in maintaining of the packages there's a dep on it.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Keyboard navigability of the Sugar UI

2010-04-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 16:25, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: Today I filed a bug to keep track of an issue that has been bothering me for a long time: There's interest from the people at La Rioja on this, how can we agree on a plan together and resource it?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.90 and migration from GConf to GSettings?

2010-04-28 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:53, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Is there yet any plans for migrations from GConf to GSettings in the 0.90 development of Sugar? I'm not sure if there's even any

Re: [Sugar-devel] Keyboard navigability of the Sugar UI

2010-04-28 Thread Christian Marc Schmidt
Hi Bernie The proposed keyboard shortcuts sound good. Maybe we can chat about the TBD items? Christian Sent from my iPhone On Apr 27, 2010, at 7:25 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: Today I filed a bug to keep track of an issue that has been bothering me for a long time:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Experimental work... updated.

2010-04-28 Thread Daniel Drake
On 28 April 2010 11:57, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote: You couldn't find logs of the failure because olpc-dm is redirecting stdout and stderr to /dev/null. I don't think this is true. Fortunately, olpc-utils rebuilds easily on the XO as soon as its builddep, ConsoleKit-devel, is

Re: [Sugar-devel] Code Review process changes

2010-04-28 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi! Bernie, Tomeu and I had a nice discussion regarding the Code Review process on #sugar yesterday. To sum it up: Several contributors are hindered or even put off by the current process. It often takes more time to handle mere technicalities (save patch to file, create ticket in Trac,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-28 Thread Sascha Silbe
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:57:24AM -0400, Raul Gutierrez Segales wrote: Great, what is the next step for inclusion? (I have no commit access to sugar-toolkit). Please provide the updated patch (i.e. including Reviewed-By/Tested-By/... lines) as a separate MIME part (I don't care whether it's

Re: [Sugar-devel] Keyboard navigability of the Sugar UI

2010-04-28 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Wed, 28-04-2010 a las 08:48 -0700, Christian Marc Schmidt escribió: The proposed keyboard shortcuts sound good. Maybe we can chat about the TBD items? Sure, ping me any time on #sugar. I'm in GMT+4 currently, same TZ as Boston. Or would you rather have a full-blown Design Team meeting?

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-28 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Wed, 28-04-2010 a las 19:33 +0200, Sascha Silbe escribió: Please provide the updated patch (i.e. including Reviewed-By/Tested-By/... lines) as a separate MIME part (I don't care whether it's marked inline or attachment, but it needs to be a separate MIME part so it doesn't get munged by

Re: [Sugar-devel] Experimental work... updated.

2010-04-28 Thread James Cameron
Thanks, Michael, this has been the first viable method for getting Sugar 0.88 working on an XO-1.5 ... I'd been needing that for some time; to check new bugs we find in 0.84 against 0.88, and to develop changes against 0.88 after I've done them on 0.84. The missing package was python-decorator.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] _update_signal_match wasn't initialized

2010-04-28 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:32:25AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Hmm... sugar-toolkit is missing a MAINTAINERS file. +1 It would be good to add it, or document the current maintainer mappings somewhere (gitorious, wiki...) Only put it somewhere else if you don't want people to find it when