On 05/07/2010 05:08 AM, Isaac Dupree wrote:
On 05/06/10 18:01, Paul Fox wrote:
heh. i was really kind of rooting for impromptu, myself. it
sounds like a lot more fun than ad hoc. Come on over! We're
having an ad hoc party!, just doesn't have the same ring to it. :-)
ahem.
i think ad hoc
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:13:38AM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
On Thursday 06 May 2010 02:14:44 am you wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 04:33:48PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
snip
As current datastore and journal maintainer, some points:
I'm still not sure will ml path proposal
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:05, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:13:38AM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
On Thursday 06 May 2010 02:14:44 am you wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 04:33:48PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
snip
As current datastore and journal
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:15:12AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:05, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:13:38AM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
On Thursday 06 May 2010 02:14:44 am you wrote:
On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 04:33:48PM -0300,
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:56, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:15:12AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:05, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 05:13:38AM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
On Thursday 06 May
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:04:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:56, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:15:12AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:05, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2010
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:41:54PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 09:37, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 07:25:12PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
To reclaim space in case of a crash, we also need to delete temporary
files at startup
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:18, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:04:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:56, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:15:12AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:28:33PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:18, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 12:04:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:56, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
+# Remove temporary files. See http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1876
+rm -rf $HOME/.sugar/default/data/*
So $profiledir/data is a tempdir? OMG! Can we change the code that
writes there to use TMPDIR or at least
El Thu, 06-05-2010 a las 23:55 +0200, Sascha Silbe escribió:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:49:23PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
We are also scheduling some time to go through the review queue on
Tuesday May 11th afternoon (UTC) and on Monday May 17th. Would be
great if patch submitters could
El Fri, 07-05-2010 a las 11:17 -0400, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
El Thu, 06-05-2010 a las 23:55 +0200, Sascha Silbe escribió:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:49:23PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
We are also scheduling some time to go through the review queue on
Tuesday May 11th afternoon
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 07:25:12PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
+# Remove temporary files. See http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1876
+rm -rf $HOME/.sugar/default/data/*
NAK.
From the low-level activity API docs[1]:
$SUGAR_ACTIVITY_ROOT/data/
This directory is used similar to a
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 01:22:41PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
I think you're mistaking $SUGAR_ACTIVITY_ROOT (e.g:
/home/aa/.sugar/default/org.laptop.Terminal/) with $HOME/.sugar/data/.
:)
D'oh. Right.
Sorry for the noise. I should really stay in bed. :)
CU Sascha
--
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:17:36AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Thu, 06-05-2010 a las 23:55 +0200, Sascha Silbe escribió:
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:49:23PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
We are also scheduling some time to go through the review queue on
Tuesday May 11th afternoon
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 11:17:36AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Patches posted to the list quickly received a lot of feedback, including
Patches via the mailinglist are great. Has my vote :-)
My only concern about
El Fri, 07-05-2010 a las 16:43 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
My only concern about mailing list scheme is that I as component
maintainer will have to setup my mail client to effectively track
patches that should go to particular release e.g. patches to current dev
branch, patches to backport to
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:44:04PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Fri, 07-05-2010 a las 16:43 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
My only concern about mailing list scheme is that I as component
maintainer will have to setup my mail client to effectively track
patches that should go to
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 04:34:56PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
On Friday 07 May 2010 04:26:45 pm Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:44:04PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
El Fri, 07-05-2010 a las 16:43 +, Aleksey Lim escribió:
My only concern about mailing list scheme is
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 3:07 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Thanks Isaac, for the detailed explanation :)
...
Great to see this coming to closure. One question I have; with these patches...
1 - If Sugar sees no known network, and no populated ad hoc
network, can we automate
El Fri, 07-05-2010 a las 16:34 -0300, Andrés Ambrois escribió:
* some is seeing commit in `git log` and wants to see discussion thread
in existed scheme, every (in ideal) commit should have ticket number
In the kernel, I usually search for lkml few words from the comment.
You could even
21 matches
Mail list logo
