On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:17:15AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
A new patch to Paint. I don't know who is the mainteiner of this
activity. Who can commit these changes and close the bugs?
Manusheel Gupta m...@laptop.org is the current maintainer.
In the meanwhile, I've tested your patch and
On 05/19/2010 04:18 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
A few months ago I finished off getting the OLPC mesh working again in
Networkmanager and Tomeu finished off the work on the Sugar side. It's
present in master and presumably 0.88.
However, it hasn't been backported to 0.84 (I thought it had, but
El Mon, 17-05-2010 a las 16:04 +0200, Sascha Silbe escribió:
If these activities currently include MANIFEST in git, then yes, they
should stop doing so. Please note that I'm talking about git only, not
release tarballs or .xo's.
What is the current purpose of storing the MANIFEST inside an
On 20 May 2010 02:53, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Wed, 19-05-2010 a las 21:40 -0400, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
I'll probably change your mind this week-end when I'll show you how the
0.88 build is coming along :-)
Sorry to respond to myself. I realized that I may have
==Sugar Digest==
1. A few weeks ago, when I was being hosted by Stephen Jacobs at RIT,
we had an opportunity to visit the Museum of Play in Rochester
(http://www.museumofplay.org). I got a behind-the-scenes look at their
collection, which includes a vast collection of computer games and
learning
Gary,
we're adding Jorge Saldivar as a committer in Labyrinth. Unless you're
opposed, we'd like to make him the current maintainer, too.
El Mon, 19-04-2010 a las 14:46 -0400, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
Gary, have you gone MIA? :-)
We really need to get these changes in for this release.
An aside about Physics - it was used with great happiness by the
children in Gaza, and features in some of the photos we just got back
from there. More as soon as we have release to publish them :-)
SJ
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote:
Hi Asaf,
On 28
As Bernie announced, we working on supporting Sugar .88 on the XO-1.
This projects is customer driven by the deployment in Paraguay. They,
along with bernie, made a decision that it would be more useful,
usable, and cost effective to settle on .88 rather than .82. This
strictly a decision made
david wrote:
As Bernie announced, we working on supporting Sugar .88 on the XO-1.
hi david --
for those of us joining this thread late, can you expand on what/who
you mean by we? (or tell me to read the archives, if that's
more appropriate.)
paul
This projects is customer driven by the
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote:
david wrote:
As Bernie announced, we working on supporting Sugar .88 on the XO-1.
hi david --
for those of us joining this thread late, can you expand on what/who
you mean by we? (or tell me to read the archives, if that's
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 03:09:58AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Unless we have imminent plans to make the MANIFEST actually do
something useful anytime soon, I'd offer the following flamebait^W
code simplification patch:
Respun for 0.84 and tested on XO-1.5 os125.
Activities continue to
El Thu, 20-05-2010 a las 12:40 -0300, Daniel Drake escribió:
However, backporting mesh support to Sugar-0.84 is still of huge value
and is not much work, and is something that can be done today.
I agree with you, and I would have volunteered to do this work if it had
happened a little earlier.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:42:08PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
BTW, yesterday I had the impression to see *6* mesh icons in the
neighbor view while testing Sugar 0.88. Does it ring any bells?
I saw that with a patch I tested in the past few months ... I don't
recall which one, but you got
13 matches
Mail list logo
