On 8 July 2010 04:49, ALEXANDER JONES (RIT Student) wrote:
> I'm writing a python program for sugar and i recently added a line at the
> top 'from sugar.activity import activity' and now every time i run it i get
> a glib.GError:Failed to contact configuration server;.(lots of text) i
> can't
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4246
Sugar Platform:
0.82 - 0.88
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/26979/visual_match-23.xo
Release notes:
* Byron Corrales fixed the robot/word-edit conflict (#2057)
* general code cleanup
Sugar Labs Activiti
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that the 10.1.1 release for XO-1.5 is out, it's a good time to
> talk about OLPC's software strategy for the future. We've got a few
> announcements to make:
>
> XO-1:
> =
>
> OLPC wasn't planning to make a Fedora 11 release of t
Chris,
thanks a lot for the extensive (and exciting!) updates and
information, much appreciated:-)
Cheers,
Christoph
Am 08.07.2010 um 00:01 schrieb Chris Ball :
> Hi,
>
> Now that the 10.1.1 release for XO-1.5 is out, it's a good time to
> talk about OLPC's software strategy for the future.
Hi,
Now that the 10.1.1 release for XO-1.5 is out, it's a good time to
talk about OLPC's software strategy for the future. We've got a few
announcements to make:
XO-1:
=
OLPC wasn't planning to make a Fedora 11 release of the XO-1 OS, but
a group of volunteers including Steven Parrish, Bern
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:18:04AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
>> Bernie wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 12:02 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
>> >> I think you are missing an important requirement: installation without
>> >> elevated permiss
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> NetworkManager used to call ntpdate when it setup a connection. Was that an
>> OLPC addition?
Yes, although it's now present in litl's software builds as well.
> We figured out that the ntp package has never been present on the XO
> ima
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:42 PM, John Gilmore wrote:
> The laptops refuse to boot a "developer's version of Linux". They
> require a signed kernel and initrd. Some people call this DRM;
> it's definitely "TiVoization" (check Wikipedia if you don't know the term).
I think it is a very well unders
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.84.11.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Cannot delete stalled download from journal #1987
* Do not fail if activity mime_type was already installed #1394
___
Sugar-deve
Hi,
Do you think that is better use same keys gconf on sugar and gnome to
maintain the same configuration?
For example, to set mouse keys on sugar, I should use:
'/desktop/gnome/accessibility/keyboard/mousekeys_enable' or
'/desktop/sugar/accessibility/keyboard/mousekeys_enable' ?
Or, to set mouse
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 01:18 -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > XO and SoaS distributions are configured for sudo with no password.
>
> Yes. However, Uruguay does not maintain this configuration choice.
I'm very sorry about this.
> > Rainbow has been bit-rotting for the past 2 years
>
> Ahem. Sug
I'm writing a python program for sugar and i recently added a line at the
top 'from sugar.activity import activity' and now every time i run it i get
a glib.GError:Failed to contact configuration server;.(lots of text) i
can't seem to figure out what this means. can anyone point me in the right
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 5:32 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
> Shipping the laptops without root access is a direct violation of the
> GPLv3 license on a dozen packages (probably 50+ packages in later
While I understand and agree with the spirit of what John wants,
"direct violation" is a strong thing to
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> And that there are efforts to solve that in the future.
>
> Oh, I was unaware of this. Who is working on it, and what's the exact
> plan?
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9564
Now, folks, please be careful here with all the exaggeration an
Aleksey wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:18:04AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
>> Bernie wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 12:02 -0400, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
>> >> I think you are missing an important requirement: installation without
>> >> elevated permissions.
>> >
>> > Rainbow has been bit-
Please, when you say Uruguay you should just say Plan Ceibal.
Has anyone formally requested Plan Ceibal to correct this situation?
Thanks,
Gabriel
2010/7/7 John Gilmore :
>> > Ignoring the fact that some deployments ship without root access.
>>
>> Is the practice of completely locking-down the
Excerpts from Tomeu Vizoso's message of Tue Jul 06 11:01:44 + 2010:
> Using 'with' like that makes us depend on Python 2.6.
Adding the following code makes "with" work in Python 2.5:
from __future__ import with_statement
> I have nothing against bumping our dependency from 2.5 to 2.6 but thi
17 matches
Mail list logo
