Try to "make bug-report" and attach the tarball. Not sure there will
be enough info there to debug though.
On 1 December 2012 20:55, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 19:08:45 +0100
>> From: dwnarv...@gmail.com
>> To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> Subject: Re: [Sugar-d
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 19:08:45 +0100
> From: dwnarv...@gmail.com
> To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-build] Support for debian wheezy
>
> This is now officially supported, with buildbot and snapshots.
>
> On 29 November 2012 02:25, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>
This is now officially supported, with buildbot and snapshots.
On 29 November 2012 02:25, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> I'm trying out debian, so I had to add support for it to sugar-build
> :) I pushed some initial code now. It's not much tested, there is no
> buildbot for it, etc. But it's a start.
>
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
wrote:
> there are a lot of ways.. see the code attached to obtain the strings..
>
> use:
>
> python get_svg_text.py dibujo.svg
>
Sorry Alan,
You are a bit long in the tooth to get credit for this task, but if
you would like to help mentor
On 1 December 2012 07:31, John Kim wrote:
> If possible, I would like to lose every trace of sugar-build in the system,
> or simply, uninstall it. Maybe then, after I run make again, it should
> work. How can I do this?
It's self-contained, so if you remove the sugar-build directory
everything w
On 1 December 2012 06:21, John Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is John Kim, and I'm interested in coding for sugar development.
>
> I'm trying to build sugar with the make command, and I seem to be having
> trouble. I am following the Building from sources from the Sugar
> Documentation.
>
> I fir
6 matches
Mail list logo
