2013/3/23 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
Hey,
Lionel's enyo-activity uses the webkit console-message signal to send
messages from the browser to the web page. This is a bit of an hack.
Also the signal is not available in webkit2 (though it might be added
at some point).
This kind of
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2013/3/23 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
Hey,
Lionel's enyo-activity uses the webkit console-message signal to send
messages from the browser to the web page. This is a bit of an hack.
Also the signal is not
2013/4/2 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
We also need to think when to switch Browse activity to webkit2.
It's enabled in F-19/gnome 3.8 I believe so if you want to start playing the
SoaSv9 Alpha Test composes in a VM would be an excellent spot to start :-D
All versions here:
2013/3/29 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
This sounds like a pretty cool feature with a simple enough implementation.
I'd say it's a good idea for 0.100.
Yes, and the others too. So the general plan of adding this almost
implemented features after review, and also html5 research is good in
Let me know if there is something I can do to help.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2013/3/29 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
This sounds like a pretty cool feature with a simple enough
implementation.
I'd say it's a good idea for 0.100.
Yes,
2013/3/28 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I started experimenting a bit with github code reviews, with Walter as
ginuea pig :) We wasn't too sure about stuff like rebasing, using
separate branches etc, so tonight I played a bit myself with creating
pull requests.
Something like the
On 04/02/2013 06:19 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org
mailto:ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2013/3/23 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
mailto:dwnarv...@gmail.com
Hey,
Lionel's enyo-activity uses the webkit
Hi devs,
I've seen some movement in current master. I suppose all this was
reviewed, but what I wonder is if we are sticking to the signed-off-by
/ acked-by signing.
The commits in question are:
commit f423ec21b4bf0d953a470a383cc801b61a087e98
Author: Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com
Date:
Hey,
sorry, I forgot about those. Though I think it's worth to think if we
really need them while we are reworking reviews a bit.
When is signed-off-by useful in sugar?
How is reviewed-by applied? Is it the reviewer which rebase and add them
before pushing?
On 2 April 2013 18:30, Manuel
On 2 April 2013 16:43, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
7 Push the changes to another remote branch
Is there a need for a new branch for each pull request? Pushing again
to the topic1 will automatically update the pull request in github.
The problem is when rebasing (i.e. making
Hi Daniel,
2013/4/2 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Hey,
sorry, I forgot about those. Though I think it's worth to think if we really
need them while we are reworking reviews a bit.
When is signed-off-by useful in sugar?
I think we just have been following other projects like the linux
So I'm not sure these are worth the overhead. Especially for signing it
doesn't seem to be very useful for us, if not in some special cases, and it
adds one more thing we need to require from contributors... I'd rather bug
them about improving the code then about using a tag of dubious utility.
As we are revisiting all the review process, can we revisit the usage
of signing the patches? What are they useful for?
2013/4/2 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
So I'm not sure these are worth the overhead. Especially for signing it
doesn't seem to be very useful for us, if not in some
2013/4/2 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
On 2 April 2013 16:43, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
7 Push the changes to another remote branch
Is there a need for a new branch for each pull request? Pushing again
to the topic1 will automatically update the pull request in github.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
2013/4/2 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
On 2 April 2013 16:43, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
7 Push the changes to another remote branch
Is there a need for a new branch for each pull request? Pushing
The patch is to be applied in mainline-repo, master-branch.
gtk3/theme/gtk-widgets.css.em | 5 ++
icons/scalable/actions/Makefile.am | 2 +
icons/scalable/actions/select-all.svg | 80 +
icons/scalable/actions/select-none.svg | 72
Hello,
I will try to send out regular reports about the progress of the 0.100
release, weekly, bi-weekly or monthly depending on how much is happening.
1. A bit late, but we finally have a schedule for the release.We are not
going to have a feature acceptance deadline this time. We decided to
Some UI feedback for the recently added comment box:
2013/4/2 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
5. Walter Bender landed several patches to add a comment box to journal
entries. It will be populated both by the Portfolio activity and by the web
services integration which is being worked on.
On 2 Apr 2013, at 23:59, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Some UI feedback for the recently added comment box:
2013/4/2 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
5. Walter Bender landed several patches to add a comment box to journal
entries. It will be populated both by the Portfolio
Hey Gary,
2013/4/2 Gary Martin garycmar...@googlemail.com:
On 2 Apr 2013, at 23:59, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote:
Some UI feedback for the recently added comment box:
2013/4/2 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
5. Walter Bender landed several patches to add a comment box to
20 matches
Mail list logo
