Re: [Sugar-devel] Network version of Abecedarium: why and how

2013-04-24 Thread lionel
Hi Gonzalo, Hmmm, interesting. You’re right it’s a good way to explore to reduce the package size. Plus, most of the times images are displayed in the game at maximum 70% of the real size. So, I’m not sure reducing quality will be visible. I’m going to try. About list of contents, it cou

Re: [Sugar-devel] Network version of Abecedarium: why and how

2013-04-24 Thread lionel
Hi Tom, Very good idea! Don’t tested but yes it should works. The WebView already reference the home page using “file:///html/index.html”. I don’t see any reason it can’t access local images on USB key. Of course, it require one USB key for each XO. Lionel. De :

Re: [Sugar-devel] [GSoC] Mentor association

2013-04-24 Thread Alexandro Colorado
Any comments? On 4/12/13, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > Oh btw I am JZA on #sugar if you want to chat about the project and > need more interactivity. > > On 4/12/13, Alexandro Colorado wrote: >> Hi I want to contribute to sugar as a mentor, I could do some >> co-mentorship or something similar. M

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems during "git pull"

2013-04-24 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
I'm only have problem with the "read-only links" (git://..).. the links who accessvia ssh I not have problems.. Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:04:01 +0200 From: dwnarv...@gmail.com To: a...@activitycentral.com CC: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; qu...@laptop.org; ma...@laptop.org Subject: Re: [Sugar-

Re: [Sugar-devel] Network version of Abecedarium: why and how

2013-04-24 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Hi Lionel, Almost 65 MB are in the html/images/database directory, I think you can reduce the size of these images to 1/4 of the actual size, just saving as gif or jpg and playing a little with the properties, without loosing too much quality. I tried with one on gimp, but you can use imagemagick o

Re: [Sugar-devel] Network version of Abecedarium: why and how

2013-04-24 Thread Thomas Gilliard
Could the HTML5 files be addressed to a locally inserted USB? file:///.. Tom Gilliard satellit On 04/24/2013 01:42 PM, Walter Bender wrote: Another thing you may consider is breaking it up into several activities (essentially removing one level hierarchy) and sharing a common database (on

Re: [Sugar-devel] Network version of Abecedarium: why and how

2013-04-24 Thread Walter Bender
Another thing you may consider is breaking it up into several activities (essentially removing one level hierarchy) and sharing a common database (on the school server or locally). -walter On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:38 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > ** ** > > I’ve released last week my Abecedariu

[Sugar-devel] Network version of Abecedarium: why and how

2013-04-24 Thread lionel
Hi all, I’ve released last week my Abecedarium activity for Sugar 0.96+. One issue with this activity is that, due to number of contents (1500 images and sounds), its size is about 100Mo. We want to deploy the activity on our Nosy Komba deployment this year: 150 XO-1 and 50 XO-1.5. Because

[Sugar-devel] Wiki profile for mentors

2013-04-24 Thread Alexandro Colorado
I think it would be very useful to have the mentors, update their wiki profile on wiki.suagarlabs.org Since many 'signed' their GSOC proposal but having no profile information makes it impossible to help the students when they want to know more about it. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH Etoys] Use ALSA sound backend if available

2013-04-24 Thread Daniel Drake
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On 15.04.2013, at 07:53, Daniel Drake wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: >>> Extend the sound backend selection code to consider using ALSA. >>> On XO-1.75 and XO-4 this fixes sound in etoys with squeak-vm-4.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github

2013-04-24 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I guess it might be complicated to actually get everyone off of git.sugarlabs.org :) Maybe after a while we can just archive the remaining repos or something. On 24 April 2013 20:29, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Other issue is, if we move all to github, we don't need maintain > our infrastructure. >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github

2013-04-24 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Other issue is, if we move all to github, we don't need maintain our infrastructure. May be we should ask to the infrastructure team Gonzalo On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 24 April 2013 20:18, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > >> >> >>> This is about the core modules.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github

2013-04-24 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 24 April 2013 20:18, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > > >> This is about the core modules. I'm not sure about activities. >> >> > I have doubts about if have some value for activities. > There are a lot of repositories, and activities have usually (and sadly) > a single developer. > Maybe we can start

Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github

2013-04-24 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
> > This is about the core modules. I'm not sure about activities. > > I have doubts about if have some value for activities. There are a lot of repositories, and activities have usually (and sadly) a single developer. Maybe we can start new activities on github? Gonzalo > -- > Daniel Narvaez >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github

2013-04-24 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 24 April 2013 19:22, Ruben Rodríguez wrote: > 2013/4/24 Daniel Narvaez : > > Hello, > > > > I suggest that we move to github permanently. > > Why not gitorious, either keeping the current one or moving to > gitorious.org? > While it's more or less the same workflow, I think github has a more

Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github

2013-04-24 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2013/4/24 Daniel Narvaez : > Hello, > > I suggest that we move to github permanently. After this testing period, I conclude that I like the workflow in github more than the previous. The web interface is better in my opinion. Might be because it is subject to more user feedback. Looking at their

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Color Palette: get back horizontal padding - SL #4325

2013-04-24 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2013/4/24 Simon Schampijer : > On 04/19/2013 03:51 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: >> >> 2013/4/18 Simon Schampijer : >>> >>> Hi Manuel, >>> >>> your patch does fix the Write-Color-Palette. >>> >>> Which is the Abacus-Palette, the custom one? Is Walter aware of this fix >>> and >>> would remove his work

Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving to github

2013-04-24 Thread Chris Ball
Hi, On Wed, Apr 24 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > I suggest that we move to github permanently. +1. I think I opposed this in the past, but it's clear that Github has become the de facto place to collaborate on free software, and I suspect we're losing potential contributors by not being there.

[Sugar-devel] Moving to github

2013-04-24 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, I suggest that we move to github permanently. * The workflow is better than both mailing list and trac. Anyone interested can subscribe and see all the patches being posted. And patches are not lost because we have a list of outstanding ones. These are the major features that was not cover

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Color Palette: get back horizontal padding - SL #4325

2013-04-24 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 04/19/2013 03:51 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: 2013/4/18 Simon Schampijer : Hi Manuel, your patch does fix the Write-Color-Palette. Which is the Abacus-Palette, the custom one? Is Walter aware of this fix and would remove his workaround (at least in master)? Yes, the Abacus palette is the cu

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems during "git pull"

2013-04-24 Thread Daniel Narvaez
It seems to be down again... On 24 April 2013 14:35, Ajay Garg wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > >> Already fixed, it seems? > > > > Yes, it is !! > Thanks to the solver-who-prefers-to-be-hidden :) > > > > >> I can git pull. > > >> 2013/4/24 James Camero

Re: [Sugar-devel] sugar-build disruption

2013-04-24 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Things should be back working now. When you update, it's probably better to make a new clone. If you find an issue please let me know. On 23 April 2013 02:21, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > I'm making changes to the sugar-build configuration, mostly to add WebKit > 2.0. Things are likely to be a bit

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems during "git pull"

2013-04-24 Thread Ajay Garg
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > Already fixed, it seems? Yes, it is !! Thanks to the solver-who-prefers-to-be-hidden :) > I can git pull. > 2013/4/24 James Cameron : > > I get the same. > > > > $ git pull > > fatal: unable to connect to git.sugarlabs.org: > > g

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems during "git pull"

2013-04-24 Thread Manuel Quiñones
Already fixed, it seems? I can git pull. 2013/4/24 James Cameron : > I get the same. > > $ git pull > fatal: unable to connect to git.sugarlabs.org: > git.sugarlabs.org[0: 18.85.44.69]: errno=Connection refused > > $ git remote -v > origin git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline.git (fetch) > ori