Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

2013-05-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
Thanks Daniel for the writeup. On 05/06/2013 12:35 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: On 6 May 2013 11:47, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Yes sugar-runner should just work in fedora as a replacement of sugar-emulator. It only needs to be packaged. Why isn't it included in the sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems with `make run`

2013-05-07 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
Hello again: Well, now all was working! it works on Ubuntu 13.10 !! 1) Would be have a parameter for make that only compiles the core sugar? Thatmeans the strictly necessary. For example: I don't want have the Terminal activity.. 2) I'm have problems with webkitgtk and then, I try compile all

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

2013-05-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 May 2013 11:47, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Yes sugar-runner should just work in fedora as a replacement of sugar-emulator. It only needs to be packaged. Why isn't it included in the sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH TamTam 1/2 v2] Output to ALSA directly from csound

2013-05-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/03/2013 02:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Hi Daniel, Already released MusicKeyboard with this change, and waiting confirmation to release TamTam activities. Gonzalo Is that in version 7? I still hear cracking sounds when using the keyboard. Or maybe those are other cracking sounds then

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH TamTam 1/2 v2] Output to ALSA directly from csound

2013-05-07 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Yes, is included on version 7. The sound is different. You can compare with version 6, and volume high. I think the problem now is different, I don't know if is saturation or the samples quality. Gonzalo On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.dewrote: On 05/03/2013

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 7 May 2013 09:46, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: The reasoning for that change are all ok. I am wondering the following: who is using 'sugar-emulator' at the moment on Fedora (or possibly other distributions)? I think a developer can use 'sugar-build' fine those days for his

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 7 May 2013 10:01, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Advantages of having it together is that as the sugar release changes the changes are made to sugar the changes to sugar-runner are in lock step so you should never get into a situation where either shouldn't work together. It

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems with `make run`

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hey! On 7 May 2013 09:49, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello again: Well, now all was working! it works on Ubuntu 13.10 !! Glad that it works! 1) Would be have a parameter for make that only compiles the core sugar? That means the strictly necessary. For example:

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

2013-05-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/07/2013 12:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: On 7 May 2013 10:01, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Advantages of having it together is that as the sugar release changes the changes are made to sugar the changes to sugar-runner are in lock step so you should never get into a

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

2013-05-07 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I think is important Fedora (and other distros) have a option to run sugar in a window in Gnome. If not, is more difficult develop activities. Gonzalo On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.dewrote: On 05/07/2013 12:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: On 7 May 2013

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

2013-05-07 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 05/07/2013 01:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I think is important Fedora (and other distros) have a option to run sugar in a window in Gnome. If not, is more difficult develop activities. Gonzalo I think a developer is off well in just use sugar-build for that purpose. At least as long as

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 7 May 2013 13:15, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: On 05/07/2013 01:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I think is important Fedora (and other distros) have a option to run sugar in a window in Gnome. If not, is more difficult develop activities. Gonzalo I think a developer is

Re: [Sugar-devel] discussion about dropping the emulator from the sugar package...

2013-05-07 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 May 2013 09:46, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: The reasoning for that change are all ok. I am wondering the following: who is using 'sugar-emulator' at the moment on Fedora (or possibly other

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problems with `make run`

2013-05-07 Thread Walter Bender
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hey! On 7 May 2013 09:49, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello again: Well, now all was working! it works on Ubuntu 13.10 !! Glad that it works! 1) Would be have a parameter for make that

[Sugar-devel] Automated pyflakes checking

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, we are now automatically checking sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 using pyflakes. Please make sure your patches are pyflakes clean, so that we don't break the build. (Running make check before pushing is a good way to ensure it). I'm planning to do the same with pep8, help with making the

[Sugar-devel] Inspection and graphics in html activities

2013-05-07 Thread Manuel Quiñones
Hi, Daniel Narvaez and I have been working in html activities yesterday. He added the very needed inspection console, and I added the graphics library with a toolbar and buttons. Inspecting the activity, like can be seen in this image, is delightful:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Inspection and graphics in html activities

2013-05-07 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Good work boys! Is something we can use in Browse too? Gonzalo On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, Daniel Narvaez and I have been working in html activities yesterday. He added the very needed inspection console, and I added the graphics library

Re: [Sugar-devel] Inspection and graphics in html activities

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
WebKit1 has a slightly different API, but it should not be too hard to add. On 7 May 2013 15:04, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Good work boys! Is something we can use in Browse too? Gonzalo On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, Daniel

[Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hi Walter, the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. (unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python) diff --git a/extensions/cpsection/updater/backends/aslo.py b/extensions/cpsectio index e244af0..7c41ae6

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release TamTam Edit-67

2013-05-07 Thread Jared Stroud
Does this work with the sugar emulator? On May 3, 2013 4:53 PM, Sugar Labs Activities activit...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4059 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.100 Download Now:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 7 May 2013 22:59, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Walter, the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. (unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python) Thanks. /me wonders why it ever

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

2013-05-07 Thread Walter Bender
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 May 2013 22:59, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Walter, the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. (unref_to_array

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

2013-05-07 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 7 May 2013 23:01, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: It's memory corruption, so it could have worked once if really lucky :) I guess I should have bought a lottery ticket, because it worked many many times in my testing. Hehe. It might be that the glib we are now building

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity updater crash

2013-05-07 Thread Walter Bender
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Walter, the updater crash seems to be a bug in your code It looks like you should use get_data to get a python array from GBytes. (unref_to_array shouldn't really be exposed in python) Thanks. /me wonders why it

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release TamTam Edit-67

2013-05-07 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Should work. Depending on your architecture, you may need compile a binary. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/Tam_Tam Gonzalo On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Jared Stroud jaredestr...@gmail.com wrote: Does this work with the sugar emulator? On May 3, 2013 4:53 PM, Sugar Labs

Re: [Sugar-devel] Automated pyflakes checking

2013-05-07 Thread William Orr
Daniel Narvaez mailto:dwnarv...@gmail.com Tuesday, May 07, 2013 8:39 AM Hello, we are now automatically checking sugar and sugar-toolkit-gtk3 using pyflakes. Please make sure your patches are pyflakes clean, so that we don't break the build. (Running make check before pushing is a good way