Hello List,
I am facing some problems building libsoup. I am running fedora 18 with git
head version of sugar-build. Has someone else faced this problem before?
I notice that sugar-build pulls the latest version of glib and builds it,
so this problem seems to be caused with some other issue. I
Can you try with a clean clone? I've moved things around a lot in the last
few days and it might be stale state somewhere. The fedora buildbot seems
happy.
On Sunday, 19 May 2013, Aneesh Dogra wrote:
Hello List,
I am facing some problems building libsoup. I am running fedora 18 with
git head
Sorry for the confusion. I've been a bit sloppy with sugar-build logs
because I was the only contributor until a couple of weeks ago... I will
try to improve now :)
On Sunday, 19 May 2013, Aneesh Dogra wrote:
Nevermind. I forked my repo at a very unfortunate time. The commiter
forgot to add
Temporarily made you an owner :) You should be able to go ahead.
On Sunday, 19 May 2013, Aneesh Dogra wrote:
Hey,
That way I can transfer the newly created sugar-html-bus [1] and
sugar-html-activity [2] to the organization's repo.
[1]: https://github.com/lionaneesh/sugar-html-bus
[2]:
Let me know when you are done so I can go ahead with the rest of your
patches.
On 19 May 2013 10:38, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Temporarily made you an owner :) You should be able to go ahead.
On Sunday, 19 May 2013, Aneesh Dogra wrote:
Hey,
That way I can transfer the
I am done! I guess! I haven't yet tested the html activity yet, because I
have a crappy net connection and sugar-build is taking centuries to
download everything. But if you can do the tests. Then I guess I am done!
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Let
All pushed, thanks! I haven't tested yet either tbh, I have a build in
progress too. Will test when that's done.
On 19 May 2013 11:05, Aneesh Dogra lionane...@gmail.com wrote:
I am done! I guess! I haven't yet tested the html activity yet, because I
have a crappy net connection and
I think we are not actually hitting the issue anymore with get_uris(), but
anyway, a patch is landing upstream to fix the get_data case too.
On 4 April 2013 23:54, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I opened a bug about the issue with dragged links having a \x00 at the end.
No AMD/CommonJS dependencies detected for:
lib/sugar-html-graphics/karma.conf.js
List any dependencies, comma separated, no spaces:
What global to use for exported value []:
It's sort of annoying/confusing. I guess we need to make volo ignore the
karma files somehow.
--
Daniel Narvaez
I tested it now. There was a couple of leftovers in sugar-html-activity
and sugar-html-template. I pushed fixes for these. I went without a review
for the sake of avoiding regressions. If anyone has comments I'm happy to
fix them now, but they was really simple changes.
Hey,
It seems like building webkitgtk is a bit of a pain for many people. I
would like people feedback on how bad of an obstacle it really is and about
a couple of possible solutions:
1 Have buildbot generate snapshots of the base system dependencies which
most people are unlikely to want to
I'd go for options 2 and 3 (just adding a comment in the build process
warning people that building webkigtk take a *long* time. So those who
want to build it themselves will know to be patient.
-walter
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
It seems
I noticed that sugarlabs was removed from my listed organizations on
github. Is it possible to add me as a member too? If its not too much to
ask!
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I tested it now. There was a couple of leftovers in sugar-html-activity
As the sugar-html-core is now splited into sugar-html-activity and
sugar-html-bus, its no point keeping it after the split.
--
Thanks
Aneesh Dogra (lionaneesh)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
I added you to the contributors group which is pull only. Does that give
you what you need?
I'm not sure if I added any module to the group, I was editing and GitHub
stopped working on my crappy connection. I will add them when it's back
anyway.
On Sunday, 19 May 2013, Aneesh Dogra wrote:
I
All modules added to the new Contributors group.
On 19 May 2013 16:48, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I added you to the contributors group which is pull only. Does that give
you what you need?
I'm not sure if I added any module to the group, I was editing and GitHub
stopped
Looks like the move had failed, probably because I already had a fork. Now
gone for real.
On 19 May 2013 16:50, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought I add moved it to my personal GitHub (didn't dare directly
killing it) but I have just seen it in the admin interface too. I will
Thanks Daniel, buildbot is happy now.
On 19 May 2013 01:41, Daniel Francis fran...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Thanks for your patch!
This code isn't used at the moment due some regressions with the Vte
dynamic
bindings. I know it breaks the buildbot, so I applied it as
Can't quite get karma to work
INFO [karma]: Karma server started at http://localhost:9876/
WARN [watcher]: Pattern
/home/dnarvaez/Development/sugar-build/build/out/install/lib/node_modules/karma/adapter/jasmine.js
does not match any file.
WARN [watcher]: Pattern
Figured out. I had first tried to install it from git, but without running
the grunt file. Then I installed from npm, but the git built was stuck in
the cache... Confusing!
On 19 May 2013 18:31, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't quite get karma to work
INFO [karma]: Karma
Hello,
I think the easiest approach is probably to
1 Install an empty html activity, say sugar-html-test module, bundle_id
org.sugarlabs.HTMLTestActivity.
2 Make sugar-activity-html support the --uri option. This is what I have
right now
-
On 19 May 2013 21:42, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
4 Somehow fix sugar-launch to work properly with html activities. The
websocket communication is not working right because it requires the
key/port variables which are in the shell environment and sugar-launch is
not running in
Hi,
I'm not have a slow computer (I think) but never can finish the compile of
webkit.Once time takes 3 hours and continues compiling: 3 hours with my 2 cores
at 95 ~ 100% of use!!I'm tire of that and do ctrl+c, go to system.json, add a
rule: if distro != ubuntu13.10..In my case of use never
El may 19, 2013 6:03 p.m., Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com
escribió:
Hi,
I'm not have a slow computer (I think) but never can finish the compile
of webkit.
Once time takes 3 hours and continues compiling: 3 hours with my 2 cores
at 95 ~ 100% of use!!
I'm tire of that and do
If instead compile it, we install as a dependency?
Or the installed version is old?
The installed version is old. The options to solve the really long building
time are: using the buildbot to get pre-compiled dependencies (similar to
binary snapshots, but only for non-sugar components) or
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:21:54PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Marco would do 2 and then consider if we can move to 1.
Manuel would like 2.
Walter would be happy with 2, as long as there is guidance.
Gonzalo and James doesn't seem happy about requiring tests at all.
No, I don't mind
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 02:36:13PM -0300, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
[...]
I would also like to express my view on contributions. We should
not block any valuable contribution.
Suppose that a child finds a bug, then modifies a file in the XO and
then sends the modified file to us in a email
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:03:42PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Just realized that sugar-launch is probably supposed to be always
launched inside a sugar-terminal, inside the shell, so the
environment should be fine there.
Yes, that is the only way I have used it.
--
James Cameron
El may 19, 2013 7:40 p.m., Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com
escribió:
And package the new version for Debian based systems??
Experimental... that package could be used by your own risk in Debian Sid
or Ubuntu 13.x
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/libwebkit2gtk-3.0-0
29 matches
Mail list logo
