Hi,
not sure what Simon and Manuel think about this, but unless someone help us
out with this asap, I think we should go ahead, resync git.sugarlabs.org -
github.com, and rename the git.sugarlabs.org repos to obsolete-*. I really
don't want to keep two repos with diverged history around longer,
2013/6/7 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com:
Hi,
not sure what Simon and Manuel think about this, but unless someone help us
out with this asap, I think we should go ahead, resync git.sugarlabs.org -
github.com, and rename the git.sugarlabs.org repos to obsolete-*. I really
don't want to
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 02:55:09PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hi,
not sure what Simon and Manuel think about this, but unless someone help us
out with this asap, I think we should go ahead, resync git.sugarlabs.org -
github.com, and rename the git.sugarlabs.org repos to obsolete-*. I
On 7 June 2013 15:07, Aleksey Lim alsr...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 02:55:09PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hi,
not sure what Simon and Manuel think about this, but unless someone help
us
out with this asap, I think we should go ahead, resync git.sugarlabs.org-
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:10:13PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 7 June 2013 15:07, Aleksey Lim alsr...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 02:55:09PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hi,
not sure what Simon and Manuel think about this, but unless someone help
us
out with
Hello devs,
In the past weeks I've been looking at how an Android Sugar shell
could provide the same services as GTK Sugar shell to the web
activities. The research is now documented in two pages at
developer.sugarlabs.org:
- Architecture http://developer.sugarlabs.org/web-architecture.md.html
Hello,
I want to report the slow but steady progress I'm doing on the web
activities UI. I started a samples repository that servers as a
showcase for activity developers and as a visual debugging tool for
sugar-web developers.
published at: https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web-samples
repo:
Hey,
I think for the introductory docs it would be much better to have index
with titles rather then filenames. I don't think docker supports it but
perhaps we could add it (just pick the first title in the document) and
upstream it.
It's probably a good time to think if we want other layout
Forgot to say that the whole point of measuring everything in subcell
sizes is that it will allow us to support different screens densities
and sizes, using the CSS media query.
2013/6/7 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org:
Published at: http://sugarlabs.github.io/sugar-web-samples/
2013/6/7
An easy way to generate a custom index would be to generate sidebar-less
pages with docker and put them inside an iframe, building links/index with
handlebars templates, from an index.json.
I'm not in love with the sidebar for introductory docs, I like the pooco
approach more
Well perhaps that's too fancy... Going somewhat crazy with all these nice
js libs.
Might be enough to add the top links in the markdown (I think you can put
plain html in it?). A bit more annoying to maintain but probably not much
On Friday, 7 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
An easy way to
In the past weeks I've been looking at how an Android Sugar shell could
provide the same services as GTK Sugar shell to the web activities. The
research is
now documented in two pages at developer.sugarlabs.org:
- Architecture http://developer.sugarlabs.org/web-architecture.md.html
-
We really need to make a call here, we start to have a sizeable amount of
code and the first release is near. I tend to think gplv2 is not an option
because of the apache incompatibility. I would go for Apache if we want to
avoid issues with anti-tivoization, otherwise gplv3.
To point out a
I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call soon, my
vote goes for Apache, both for sugar-web and for activities we develop.
On Saturday, 8 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
We really need to make a call here, we start to have a sizeable amount of
code and the first
Ugh one issue with Apache is that I think we would need to get permission
to relicense the svg icons under apache from all the people that
contributed to them. Do you think that will be possible?
People that contributed but doesn't seem to be involved with the project
anymore.
Eben Eliason
Marco
Well permission to double license really.
On Saturday, 8 June 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Ugh one issue with Apache is that I think we would need to get permission
to relicense the svg icons under apache from all the people that
contributed to them. Do you think that will be possible?
We already had this discussion two years ago,
is the situation with the javascript activities different to need
start this discussion again?
Gonzalo
On 06/14/2011 05:42 PM, Luke Faraone wrote:
This is a vote to determine the suggested license for future releases
of Sugar. This poll will run
Yes I think it's very different because using GPLv2 would mean we can't use
Apache licensed libraries, which are a big percentage of available js
libraries.
On Saturday, 8 June 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
We already had this discussion two years ago,
is the situation with the javascript
I'm actually a bit confused about the result of the one year ago
discussion. I thought we decided to stay with gplv2 but the poll winner
seems to be gplv3?
Anyway even on gplv3 I think the situation is pretty different if nothing
else because one of major goals of the web activities work is to
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote:
Ugh one issue with Apache is that I think we would need to get permission to
relicense the svg icons under apache from all the people that contributed to
them. Do you think that will be possible?
I am happy to reach out
Hi,
The poll winner was GPLv3 but the poll was non-binding, i.e. the
community can't force contributors to switch licenses and nobody sent a
patch to change license notices.
I and other members of the community think it's important to support
freedom by using copyleft, therefore most of our
21 matches
Mail list logo
